Never to the dark side Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 as Pack is good passer of the ball,SIDEWAYS. Wrap up well every one, its a bright sunny day,but very very cold. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
havanatopia Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 The score line was 1-1 when Wilbraham came off; in spite of the age he is our only steadying rock since Wade retired. He would be the first man on my starting team sheet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest rockinrobin Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 10 minutes ago, Never to the dark side said: as Pack is good passer of the ball,SIDEWAYS. Wrap up well every one, its a bright sunny day,but very very cold. Morning John hope your well mate. have to agree with havan Wilbs brings out the best in Jimmy, but I agree with the rest of the changes. Chris from Darlington Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P'head Red Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 The trouble is, I think Reid struggles just as much as Pack when played in that position, He's much better suited to where Freeman is imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reddogkev Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 I'd keep Reid and Burns on the bench for the time being. My team would be: O'Donnell Ayling Flint Baker Williams Little Smith Pack Bryan Kodjia Wilbraham * Freeman to be rested - would give a lot of options from the bench. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bemmyredjeff Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 1 hour ago, havanatopia said: The score line was 1-1 when Wilbraham came off; in spite of the age he is our only steadying rock since Wade retired. He would be the first man on my starting team sheet. That just shows how desperate our plight has been all season then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TETBURY MASSIVE Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 I have been told we will be playing 4-3-3 told with no Wilbraham. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 7 minutes ago, TETBURY MASSIVE said: I have been told we will be playing 4-3-3 told with no Wilbraham. Source? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TETBURY MASSIVE Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 1 minute ago, Super said: Source? Ha Ha Ha good effort...... We will just have to see..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reddogkev Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 1 hour ago, TETBURY MASSIVE said: I have been told we will be playing 4-3-3 told with no Wilbraham. Perhaps Wilbs could do with a rest. A front 3 of Burns, Kodjia and Agard? Looks good on paper, and might cause the vaunted Boro defence one or two problems. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P'head Red Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 1 hour ago, TETBURY MASSIVE said: I have been told we will be playing 4-3-3 told with no Wilbraham. Will be interesting to see. Midfield three of Pack, Smith & Reid? Freeman, Kodjia & Agard up top? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ashtonphil Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 1 hour ago, TETBURY MASSIVE said: Ha Ha Ha good effort...... We will just have to see..... I was told 442 My source the anonymous kind Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TETBURY MASSIVE Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 6 hours ago, ashtonphil said: I was told 442 My source the anonymous kind Whoops.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ashtonphil Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 It's clear that you get told things by people around the club.... Like you TM I have a "source" I don't write anything here as it would betray the trust I've been given. I got it slightly wrong Please don't be a smart arse and gloat about it. It's beneath you I knew it wouldn't be 3-5-2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.