Vincent Vega Posted February 12, 2016 Report Share Posted February 12, 2016 433 , 442 or even 532 imagine that . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unan Posted February 12, 2016 Report Share Posted February 12, 2016 3-5-2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nomad Posted February 12, 2016 Report Share Posted February 12, 2016 4-5-1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
And Its Smith Posted February 12, 2016 Report Share Posted February 12, 2016 5-4-3-2-1..........54321........ 2-4-6-8. Who do we appreciate? Not Marlon Pack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Brent Posted February 12, 2016 Report Share Posted February 12, 2016 1 minute ago, RedDave said: 5-4-3-2-1..........54321........ 2-4-6-8. Who do we appreciate? Not Marlon Pack That's too many. A total of 10 is a nice number to go for (we tend not to include goalkeepers in the formation - their position is usually a given) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fiale Posted February 12, 2016 Report Share Posted February 12, 2016 4-1-3-2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
42nite Posted February 12, 2016 Report Share Posted February 12, 2016 1-9 That'll do it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I'm Brian Posted February 12, 2016 Report Share Posted February 12, 2016 Seemed to be suggesting 4 4 2 from what LJ has said so far. Wouldn't be surprised to see the same as recent games v Ipswich though (which is 4 5 1 in my opinion despite it being dressed up as many other things) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.