Nomad Posted February 13, 2016 Report Share Posted February 13, 2016 So, back to back wins and conceded 4 goals in the last 6 games. However it's obvious that we do not have the players to select a 4-4-2 formation. Forever Yours, SC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Between heaven and hell Posted February 13, 2016 Report Share Posted February 13, 2016 39 minutes ago, Nomad said: So, back to back wins and conceded 4 goals in the last 6 games. However it's obvious that we do not have the players to select a 4-4-2 formation. Forever Yours, SC Just what we were discussing on the way home, four at the back with Goldbourn in at left back looked solid enough we just need to work on Mark Little a bit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nickolas Posted February 13, 2016 Report Share Posted February 13, 2016 45 minutes ago, Nomad said: So, back to back wins and conceded 4 goals in the last 6 games. However it's obvious that we do not have the players to select a 4-4-2 formation. Forever Yours, SC Or F for FLINT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ten minutes of rough Posted February 13, 2016 Report Share Posted February 13, 2016 53 minutes ago, Nomad said: So, back to back wins and conceded 4 goals in the last 6 games. However it's obvious that we do not have the players to select a 4-4-2 formation. Forever Yours, SC We do have the players though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lanterne Rouge Posted February 13, 2016 Report Share Posted February 13, 2016 1 hour ago, ten minutes of rough said: We do have the players though. We always did. It was just that one person couldn`t or wouldn`t see it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moloch Posted February 13, 2016 Report Share Posted February 13, 2016 How did we line up? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moloch Posted February 13, 2016 Report Share Posted February 13, 2016 How did we line up? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Popodopolous Posted February 14, 2016 Report Share Posted February 14, 2016 I reckon it is a 4-2-3-1 tbh. Back four Pack Smith Freeman Tomlin Bryan Kodjia Or a 4-4-1-1 kinda thing with a 4-4. Then Tomlin behind Kodjia. Unsure its a straight 4-4-2 however...either way its still definitely different to a 3-5-2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dynamite Red Posted February 14, 2016 Report Share Posted February 14, 2016 16 hours ago, Nomad said: So, back to back wins and conceded 4 goals in the last 6 games. However it's obvious that we do not have the players to select a 4-4-2 formation. Forever Yours, SC Except for not playing 4-4-2 yesterday and no dedicated left back this season under SC, your bang on the money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davefevs Posted February 14, 2016 Report Share Posted February 14, 2016 1 hour ago, Mr Popodopolous said: I reckon it is a 4-2-3-1 tbh. Back four Pack Smith Freeman Tomlin Bryan Kodjia Or a 4-4-1-1 kinda thing with a 4-4. Then Tomlin behind Kodjia. Unsure its a straight 4-4-2 however...either way its still definitely different to a 3-5-2. Tomlin definitely played a lot closer to Kodjia yesterday then the traditional number 10 (wearing #9), making it a two up top at times. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamesBCFC Posted February 14, 2016 Report Share Posted February 14, 2016 I had us as 4-2-3-1 as well Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CityCiderEd Posted February 14, 2016 Report Share Posted February 14, 2016 I think if this system had been used a few months before we wouldn't be where we currently find ourselves.We're getting harder to beat and if we start taking a few of the many chances we are now creating we should be fine.Certainly beats the some of the early home games when we only had the odd shot on target. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigTone Posted February 14, 2016 Report Share Posted February 14, 2016 I thought F was for pheasant Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davefevs Posted February 14, 2016 Report Share Posted February 14, 2016 1 minute ago, BigTone said: I thought F was for pheasant [look up Peter Shilton - Plymouth if you're wondering] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Curr Avon Posted February 14, 2016 Report Share Posted February 14, 2016 F, for fluidity; with Korey Smith bursting into the box to curl a shot narrowly wide in the first half and get tackled before pulling the trigger, following a slick passing move after the break. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.