Chalkie Posted March 14, 2016 Report Share Posted March 14, 2016 .......... on loan allegedly; Wolves fans seem less than impressed! http://www.molineuxmix.co.uk/vb/showthread.php?t=97059 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScottishRed Posted March 14, 2016 Report Share Posted March 14, 2016 I would be very surprised if this was true - why would a team in deep relegation trouble loan out any striker right now, even one that is not currently getting much game time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 14, 2016 Report Share Posted March 14, 2016 4 minutes ago, ScottishRed said: I would be very surprised if this was true - why would a team in deep relegation trouble loan out any striker right now, even one that is not currently getting much game time. Goals aren't the problem for Fulham. Maybe getting rid of his wages could bring in a defender or two. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScottishRed Posted March 14, 2016 Report Share Posted March 14, 2016 3 minutes ago, Tomarse said: Goals aren't the problem for Fulham. Maybe getting rid of his wages could bring in a defender or two. That is true but the loan window closes in 2 weeks, if you let a striker go now and then you get an injury / 3 match suspension for either McCormack or Dembelia you could have a problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pongo88 Posted March 14, 2016 Report Share Posted March 14, 2016 I thought the Wolves forum comments were well balanced. Some for, some against, and some couldn't care less as the season is over for them. At least there wasn't a "zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A Horse With No Name Posted March 14, 2016 Report Share Posted March 14, 2016 36 minutes ago, pongo88 said: I thought the Wolves forum comments were well balanced. Some for, some against, and some couldn't care less as the season is over for them. At least there wasn't a "zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz" There would be if they had a member called Robbogold Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobBobSuperBob Posted March 14, 2016 Report Share Posted March 14, 2016 Fulham are getting Aluko from Hull - Fulhams Serbian gaffer just doesn't fancy Smith Think he will do well at Wolves - good fit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Selred Posted March 14, 2016 Report Share Posted March 14, 2016 26 minutes ago, BobBobSuperBob said: Fulham are getting Aluko from Hull - Fulhams Serbian gaffer just doesn't fancy Smith Think he will do well at Wolves - good fit Good signing for Fulham, a lot of pace and creativity in their team, just need to shore their defence still. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Posted March 14, 2016 Report Share Posted March 14, 2016 Good news as Wolves still have to play teams around us, sure he'll want to do us a favour. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lanterne Rouge Posted March 14, 2016 Report Share Posted March 14, 2016 I can`t understand why Wolves are loaning players anyway TBH. They`re going nowhere this season so it`s just extra expense for no real gain - unless it`s with a view to a perm in the summer of course, he is a local boy to there after all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Gasbuster Posted March 14, 2016 Report Share Posted March 14, 2016 7 hours ago, The Horse With No Name said: There would be if they had a member called Robbogold Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davefevs Posted March 14, 2016 Report Share Posted March 14, 2016 I thought Fulham were under a transfer embargo? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrahamC Posted March 14, 2016 Report Share Posted March 14, 2016 5 minutes ago, Davefevs said: I thought Fulham were under a transfer embargo? They are. I think they've only made 4 signings since then... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fordy62 Posted March 14, 2016 Report Share Posted March 14, 2016 So is this real or made up? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
And Its Smith Posted March 14, 2016 Report Share Posted March 14, 2016 17 minutes ago, Davefevs said: I thought Fulham were under a transfer embargo? Embargo doesn't mean zero signings. Think you are allowed to spend a percentage of revenue on wages and transfer fees. I believe Forests figure is £600k. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davefevs Posted March 14, 2016 Report Share Posted March 14, 2016 Ok, seems like there is a one in one out rule subject to player in being 75% of the player going out, and max of £600k pa (pro rata) Embargo Rules Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fatalist Posted March 14, 2016 Report Share Posted March 14, 2016 1 hour ago, Davefevs said: Ok, seems like there is a one in one out rule subject to player in being 75% of the player going out, and max of £600k pa (pro rata) Embargo Rules So they can't sign anyone over 4 foot 8? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davefevs Posted March 14, 2016 Report Share Posted March 14, 2016 48 minutes ago, Fatalist said: So they can't sign anyone over 4 foot 8? ha ha....nice one Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kiwicolin Posted March 15, 2016 Report Share Posted March 15, 2016 20 hours ago, Tomarse said: Goals aren't the problem for Fulham. Maybe getting rid of his wages could bring in a defender or two. If wages were s problem why didn't they let him sign for us permanently ? Maybe Matt wanted to stay ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cunnyfunt Posted March 15, 2016 Report Share Posted March 15, 2016 21 hours ago, Chalkie said: .......... on loan allegedly; Wolves fans seem less than impressed! http://www.molineuxmix.co.uk/vb/showthread.php?t=97059 Sounds familiar.. Takes me back to last season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobBobSuperBob Posted March 15, 2016 Report Share Posted March 15, 2016 55 minutes ago, kiwicolin said: If wages were s problem why didn't they let him sign for us permanently ? Maybe Matt wanted to stay ? Didn't SL say in his recent Q&A that we asked / ? Bid ? But Fulham not interested in helping out a relegation rival Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
havanatopia Posted March 15, 2016 Report Share Posted March 15, 2016 13 hours ago, RedDave said: Embargo doesn't mean zero signings. Think you are allowed to spend a percentage of revenue on wages and transfer fees. I believe Forests figure is £600k. In my humbles they should remove the word 'embargo' from the rule book then because it is something of a misnomer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.