Jump to content
IGNORED

2016?????


Recommended Posts

I think we should boycott attending Women's Institute meetings and watching Loose Women in protest. While we're at it we should support women's entitlement to their pension before men, celebrate the fact that they live - on average 4 years longer than men and yet have 80% of preventative health care budget spent on them and, finally, welcome the fact that women get paid the same as men for doing less work at Wimbledon!

Life is full of injustices. Not saying it's right just balancing the argument.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Moor2Sea said:

I think we should boycott attending Women's Institute meetings and watching Loose Women in protest. While we're at it we should support women's entitlement to their pension before men, celebrate the fact that they live - on average 4 years longer than men and yet have 80% of preventative health care budget spent on them and, finally, welcome the fact that women get paid the same as men for doing less work at Wimbledon!

Life is full of injustices. Not saying it's right just balancing the argument.

 

Just to balance things up even more, there is always beach volley ball.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The part being left out is that just because you're a man doesn't mean you'll be able to get membership there either, its a private members club who can admit who they want. If they want to accept they won't host major competitions as a result so be it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, northsomersetred said:

It's a members club and it's up to them how they vote. 

Strange rules 2/3rds majority needed 64% voted in favour.

8 hours ago, hodge said:

The part being left out is that just because you're a man doesn't mean you'll be able to get membership there either, its a private members club who can admit who they want. If they want to accept they won't host major competitions as a result so be it. 

I wonder how many ethnic members that they have?.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Kid in the Riot said:

It's just bizarre in this day and age. Are they all gay or something? Unable to communicate with women?

 

Strange question, do you also think the Women's Institute are all Lesbians ?    It's funny only the other day the BBC had a few stories on how men find it harder to make and keep friends out side of work, and the large negative effects it has on their mental health. Charities are trying to create groups so men can meet and socialise. Then when we get a all male club voting to remain that way people accuse them of being gay and unable to communicate with women...  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Fiale said:

Strange question, do you also think the Women's Institute are all Lesbians ?    It's funny only the other day the BBC had a few stories on how men find it harder to make and keep friends out side of work, and the large negative effects it has on their mental health. Charities are trying to create groups so men can meet and socialise. Then when we get a all male club voting to remain that way people accuse them of being gay and unable to communicate with women...  

It was said tongue in cheek, I just find it a bit strange that's all. Notwithstanding they are denying women being able to be Members of one of the finest golf courses in the world, for what exactly...?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Kid in the Riot said:

It was said tongue in cheek, I just find it a bit strange that's all. Notwithstanding they are denying women being able to be Members of one of the finest golf courses in the world, for what exactly...?

I expect all those high heels would play havoc with the greens

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, richwwtk said:

I expect all those high heels would play havoc with the greens

I just read a quote from a female golfer who had just played a round at Muirfield and was then made to sit outside whilst male members (pun intended) walk in and out including one with a his pet dog.

I bet Donald Trump would get in.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Fiale said:

Seems all Male only clubs and groups have been pretty much forced to be open to women (including Scouts and Cubs) but it doesn't seem to work the other way. 

Very true.

My local swimming pool recently changed around all it's schedules.

Tuesday and Thursday evenings between 8.00 pm and 9.00 pm were always reserved for lanes to be installed. This was an opportunity to swim numerous lengths unimpeded, without kids messing about, or others swimming widths.

This has now been scrapped to accommodate a "ladies group", where men are not permitted, of course. The evening lanes sessions have not been re-scheduled.

Imagine the fuss if a "gentleman's group" session had been formed, where women are not allowed to join ? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Esmond Million's Bung said:

Strange rules 2/3rds majority needed 64% voted in favour.

I wonder how many ethnic members that they have?.

As i said it's members club, i suspect they'll probably need 2/3 majority of the vote to change it to 50/50

How many ethnic members? I reckon getting on for 95%, nearly all of them sweaty socks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/19/2016 at 21:12, Moor2Sea said:

I think we should boycott attending Women's Institute meetings and watching Loose Women in protest. While we're at it we should support women's entitlement to their pension before men, celebrate the fact that they live - on average 4 years longer than men and yet have 80% of preventative health care budget spent on them and, finally, welcome the fact that women get paid the same as men for doing less work at Wimbledon!

Life is full of injustices. Not saying it's right just balancing the argument.

 

That particular little anomaly is stopping. It's 66 for all from 2020.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Think a few on here have alluded to the problem.

Recently, rather than being "anti-discrimination" the UK has become "pro positive discrimination".

Basically, if you're white, male, athiest (or christian), heterosexual and you have remained the gender you were born you are the enemy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where the Women's Institute example falls down is that, to my knowledge, there aren't men who want to join the WI and have been refused.  It also doesn't manage large public sporting events and then tell female chief executives or commentators that they have to eat in the staff kitchen as they can't be in the main club. 

Similarly, I have to admit I don't really see the reason to get outraged at female-only swimming clubs or the female-only section of the gym.  It would be lovely to live in an equal society (and the thisgirlcan campaign a couple of years ago was great and maybe shifted attitudes) but I completely understand that women might feel stigmatised or uncomfortable in a gym as, let's be honest here, many men do tend to ogle anyone in good shape or silently judge anyone is not.  And frankly, in a country with an obesity epidemic, anything that makes people feel comfortable exercising is an inherently good thing.

Ultimately I accept the golf club is a private members club and have every right to set their own rules but, by the same token, anyone observing has every right to criticise how archaic those rules are.  And obviously it would be completely wrong to host any major golf event at a venue where some people will be excluded. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...