EmersonsKev Posted July 1, 2004 Report Share Posted July 1, 2004 By looks of it he wants to get away from Blackpool to be nearer his family in London. Worth a look if we fail in getting Steve MaClean? Sheff Wed page Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TomBCFCUK Posted July 1, 2004 Report Share Posted July 1, 2004 Taylor would be a much better player than Maclean in my eyes Taylor is a player that can play up front with all sort of strikers he could play with heffernan and he could play with miller and he can easily get 25 goals a season for us if we signed him. As for Maclean i have seen him play twice last season and both games he has fell to look the best player on the park in 1 of the games torpey looked a better striker than Maclean. I will have faith in Tinman in watever he does if he signs Maclean its his choice Maclean might come and prove me wrong. But lets wait and see ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pewsham Posted July 1, 2004 Report Share Posted July 1, 2004 Given a straight choice between Taylor and Maclean - Taylor would be a better bet! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest smoking_Gee Posted July 1, 2004 Report Share Posted July 1, 2004 But Blackpool want over 500k for him! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Georgeformbygrill Posted July 1, 2004 Report Share Posted July 1, 2004 Taylor would be a much better player than Maclean in my eyes Taylor is a player that can play up front with all sort of strikers he could play with heffernan and he could play with miller and he can easily get 25 goals a season for us if we signed him. As for Maclean i have seen him play twice last season and both games he has fell to look the best player on the park in 1 of the games torpey looked a better striker than Maclean. I will have faith in Tinman in watever he does if he signs Maclean its his choice Maclean might come and prove me wrong. But lets wait and see ? In a previous post you said Maclean was the best player in the two games that you saw Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cider Army Posted July 1, 2004 Report Share Posted July 1, 2004 much better player but will cost a lot more,but stranger things have happened it might happen who no's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stedge Posted July 1, 2004 Report Share Posted July 1, 2004 Whitey said in an earlier topic that when Maclean heard that city had agreed a fee with rangers,he was straight on our website looking at the forum.Lets hope he's not on here now or he might think twice about coming here,and we'll end up with no-one,cause i cant see us stumping a big fee up for Taylor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Red Rich Posted July 1, 2004 Report Share Posted July 1, 2004 In a previous post you said Maclean was the best player in the two games that you saw Yep, here it is: QUOTE (Ronnie @ Jun 30 2004, 11:52 AM) Tombc######, what sort of player is maclean? Why will he be a waste of money and how many times have you seen him play? He does work hard but he aint the player that would do well with heffernan he can get goals but scrappy goals and he doesnt win alot in the air.I have seen him play 2 times last season at scunthorpe and both times he was the best player but he was nothing special. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wardie Posted July 2, 2004 Report Share Posted July 2, 2004 i would like to see scott taylor here, but at the end of the day if blackpool want 500k when i thought he was out of contract and he is 28 so a fee is not required. i would prefer for us to get maclean in because it will be a better finacially for the club and he is still young. also taylor is a bit dodgy getting injured sometimes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TomBCFCUK Posted July 2, 2004 Report Share Posted July 2, 2004 In a previous post you said Maclean was the best player in the two games that you saw In one of the games i have to admit he did play well and looked the best player but in a average mid table team as for the other game torpey and him hardley ever touched the ball but when they did torpey looked the most dangerous striker i aint saying that we shouldnt sign him because he might and i reckon he will play alot better in a batter team but lets wait and see....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Georgeformbygrill Posted July 2, 2004 Report Share Posted July 2, 2004 In one of the games i have to admit he did play well and looked the best player but in a average mid table team as for the other game torpey and him hardley ever touched the ball but when they did torpey looked the most dangerous striker i aint saying that we shouldnt sign him because he might and i reckon he will play alot better in a batter team but lets wait and see....... ← When did you see scunny and why? I go to see them a bit due to family up there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.