Roadrunner Posted August 15, 2016 Report Share Posted August 15, 2016 http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/37083859 So how much have we got coming to us? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BCFC Jimmer Posted August 15, 2016 Report Share Posted August 15, 2016 4 minutes ago, Roadrunner said: So how much have we got coming to us? I think this has been established 5 thousand times. Nobody has a clue and anyone who is speculating with figures is probably making it up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spoons Posted August 15, 2016 Report Share Posted August 15, 2016 Trillions!!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charliesboots Posted August 15, 2016 Report Share Posted August 15, 2016 Around £4.5M. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedRock Posted August 15, 2016 Report Share Posted August 15, 2016 100 Green Shield Stamps is wot I heard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CodeRed Posted August 15, 2016 Report Share Posted August 15, 2016 17 minutes ago, Roadrunner said: http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/37083859 So how much have we got coming to us? Whatever the amount it's unlikely to make much difference. We (Bristol City) make a loss every year - anywhere between £8M - £15M - depending on how much is spent on player acquisitions, the more we spend the more we lose. Steve Lansdown picks up the tab (either by a loan, or by taking a (even) larger equity stake. If money comes in from Palace (between £3M and £5M are the most popular guesses) - then that's £3-£5M less for Steve to fork out. The budget for the year is set, If SL wanted (or felt it necessary to) increase the budget he's wealthy enough to do that with or without the Bolasie money. The only person it really benefits is SL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red Necromancer Posted August 15, 2016 Report Share Posted August 15, 2016 £4.9 according to Stockhausen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bristol Rob Posted August 15, 2016 Report Share Posted August 15, 2016 Food vouchers. Source. My personal account manager Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bar BS3 Posted August 15, 2016 Report Share Posted August 15, 2016 8 minutes ago, Red Necromancer said: £4.9 according to Stockhausen. 20% would surprise me. Far more likely to be 10-15% Either way, kerchiiiiing! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wheatus59 Posted August 15, 2016 Report Share Posted August 15, 2016 20 minutes ago, CodeRed said: Whatever the amount it's unlikely to make much difference. We (Bristol City) make a loss every year - anywhere between £8M - £15M - depending on how much is spent on player acquisitions, the more we spend the more we lose. Steve Lansdown picks up the tab (either by a loan, or by taking a (even) larger equity stake. If money comes in from Palace (between £3M and £5M are the most popular guesses) - then that's £3-£5M less for Steve to fork out. The budget for the year is set, If SL wanted (or felt it necessary to) increase the budget he's wealthy enough to do that with or without the Bolasie money. The only person it really benefits is SL Nothing quite like a bit of optimism to cheer us all up ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cowshed Posted August 15, 2016 Report Share Posted August 15, 2016 Code Reds post is correct though isn't it Wheatus? If the money is used to offset Bristol City's current losses and debts that is less for Steve Lansdown to incur. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bar BS3 Posted August 15, 2016 Report Share Posted August 15, 2016 41 minutes ago, CodeRed said: Whatever the amount it's unlikely to make much difference. We (Bristol City) make a loss every year - anywhere between £8M - £15M - depending on how much is spent on player acquisitions, the more we spend the more we lose. Steve Lansdown picks up the tab (either by a loan, or by taking a (even) larger equity stake. If money comes in from Palace (between £3M and £5M are the most popular guesses) - then that's £3-£5M less for Steve to fork out. The budget for the year is set, If SL wanted (or felt it necessary to) increase the budget he's wealthy enough to do that with or without the Bolasie money. The only person it really benefits is SL It will increase our turnover and therefore increases our position with FFP. Considering our annual turnover (based on 2014) was around £8m, a boost of £3m+ could make a big difference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brizzlelou Posted August 15, 2016 Report Share Posted August 15, 2016 It'll cover Tomlins wages won't it??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
... Posted August 15, 2016 Report Share Posted August 15, 2016 £4.5M?? Is this enough to buy the row of houses behind the Atyeo, knock the stand down, and complete the stadium?? Capacity will then be approx 35,000. We will need that for the Europa league. Uncle TFR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drew Peacock Posted August 15, 2016 Report Share Posted August 15, 2016 2 hours ago, Roadrunner said: http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/37083859 So how much have we got coming to us? Enough to make us the 6th richest club in the UK. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redordead1 Posted August 15, 2016 Report Share Posted August 15, 2016 1 hour ago, billywedlock said: Long term SL would love to offset his losses but methinks he would , at this stage , see such money as a way to get us nearer the Prem . His return will be then . Don't get me wrong, it's great for the club to get a bonus payment of £5-6m. However, I do wonder whether people realise that this amount only equates to roughly about 0.25% of SL's wealth. Not knocking him, but he's probably put in about 5% of his wealth to date (less than the average fan as a % I'd guess?) and owns AG and other assets. At some point we will reach the premiership, and no doubt he'll get a great ROI, but let's no over-estimate the importance of this paycheck, as nice as it is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slartibartfast Posted August 15, 2016 Report Share Posted August 15, 2016 2 hours ago, CodeRed said: Whatever the amount it's unlikely to make much difference. That sounds like Walley & Hamster when Saino's court case went tits up! Of course it will make a difference! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UREDS_91 Posted August 15, 2016 Report Share Posted August 15, 2016 Enough to buy bamford............ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phileas Fogg Posted August 15, 2016 Report Share Posted August 15, 2016 1 hour ago, Bar BS3 said: 20% would surprise me. Far more likely to be 10-15% Either way, kerchiiiiing! Why? I doubt Palace ever anticipated he'd be a ~£30m player. I think a 20% sell on isn't that uncommon in transfers really, especially young players. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrahamC Posted August 15, 2016 Report Share Posted August 15, 2016 2 hours ago, Red Necromancer said: £4.9 according to Stockhausen. Like he knows. I think his is as good at Maths as he is sports reporting.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
downendcity Posted August 15, 2016 Report Share Posted August 15, 2016 1 hour ago, brizzlelou said: It'll cover Tomlins wages pie bill won't it??? Slight correction needed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
downendcity Posted August 15, 2016 Report Share Posted August 15, 2016 2 hours ago, Red Necromancer said: £4.9 according to Stockhausen. £4892679.75 approximately. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cityexile Posted August 15, 2016 Report Share Posted August 15, 2016 2 hours ago, CodeRed said: Whatever the amount it's unlikely to make much difference. We (Bristol City) make a loss every year - anywhere between £8M - £15M - depending on how much is spent on player acquisitions, the more we spend the more we lose. Steve Lansdown picks up the tab (either by a loan, or by taking a (even) larger equity stake. If money comes in from Palace (between £3M and £5M are the most popular guesses) - then that's £3-£5M less for Steve to fork out. The budget for the year is set, If SL wanted (or felt it necessary to) increase the budget he's wealthy enough to do that with or without the Bolasie money. The only person it really benefits is SL Not disagreeing with you, but what a time to be alive. 2nd tier side, and the best part of £5m makes 'little difference'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Brent Posted August 15, 2016 Report Share Posted August 15, 2016 2 hours ago, Red Necromancer said: £4.9 according to Stockhausen. Ok, so now we've established its not 4.9m. Any other suggestions? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Up The City! Posted August 15, 2016 Report Share Posted August 15, 2016 2 hours ago, Libertine1 said: Ok, so now we've established its not 4.9m. Any other suggestions? Bang on 5 million I'd say. With Palace banking the 20 million. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Up The City! Posted August 15, 2016 Report Share Posted August 15, 2016 Do we have to give Plymouth anything? If they had a sell on clause inserted when we purchased him they would be due a percentage of this too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Son of Fred Posted August 15, 2016 Report Share Posted August 15, 2016 4 hours ago, Charliesboots said: Around £4.5M. I'll take it...just don't tell 'the Mrs......no more "your dinners in the dog"... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Brent Posted August 15, 2016 Report Share Posted August 15, 2016 8 minutes ago, Just Red said: Do we have to give Plymouth anything? If they had a sell on clause inserted when we purchased him they would be due a percentage of this too. Doesn't the sell on clause work just once? i.e. Plymouth received a percentage of the 300k we received from Palace. If they had such a clause inserted of course. We wouldn't get anything if Everton sold Bolasie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phileas Fogg Posted August 15, 2016 Report Share Posted August 15, 2016 17 minutes ago, Just Red said: Do we have to give Plymouth anything? If they had a sell on clause inserted when we purchased him they would be due a percentage of this too. Don't think it works like that. It'd be a sell on for the first transfer - us to palace. When he moved to palace his transfer and contract became a new entity entirely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Up The City! Posted August 15, 2016 Report Share Posted August 15, 2016 4 minutes ago, Phileas Fogg said: Don't think it works like that. It'd be a sell on for the first transfer - us to palace. When he moved to palace his transfer and contract became a new entity entirely. Surely it all depends on what was written into the clause? I can vaguely remember some examples of this in the past. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.