cheshire_red Posted September 6, 2016 Report Share Posted September 6, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nomad Posted September 6, 2016 Report Share Posted September 6, 2016 Great goal but why is he playing in the reserves (unless he needs the match fitness)? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spoons Posted September 6, 2016 Report Share Posted September 6, 2016 Sign him on!! Ohh wait we have already!! .. 18 years old bright prospect. Watched him live only once against clevedon pre season and although very direct and exciting he seems to have a bit of attitude in him like all good ' maverick ' players do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JasonM88 Posted September 6, 2016 Report Share Posted September 6, 2016 Why's he playing in Cheltenhams reserves when he could be playing in ours? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
And Its Smith Posted September 6, 2016 Report Share Posted September 6, 2016 6 hours ago, Nomad said: Great goal but why is he playing in the reserves (unless he needs the match fitness)? 28 minutes ago, JasonM88 said: Why's he playing in Cheltenhams reserves when he could be playing in ours? They take him on loan and then make a better judgment on his ability. Just cos he's on loan doesn't mean he has to play. Robinson was on loan with us last season and didn't play. He needs to show he is good enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nomad Posted September 7, 2016 Report Share Posted September 7, 2016 8 hours ago, RedDave said: They take him on loan and then make a better judgment on his ability. Just cos he's on loan doesn't mean he has to play. Robinson was on loan with us last season and didn't play. He needs to show he is good enough. No reason there couldn't have been a clause like Tammy has to guarantee games. If he is going to sit in the reserves he'd be better off back here or on loan at a lower level with competitive games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin Ian M Posted September 7, 2016 Admin Report Share Posted September 7, 2016 I think he's being used off the bench in 1st team games so they are obviously using him in the reserves to stay fit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HomerRed Posted September 7, 2016 Report Share Posted September 7, 2016 He's not had any minutes in their last two league games. Clearly if that continues it all becomes a bit pointless from his point of view. Maybe GJ needed to see a bit more from him. Maybe they need to be a bit more solid while they get a foothold in the league. Goals like that won't do his chances any harm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bat Fastard Posted September 7, 2016 Report Share Posted September 7, 2016 He has shown us again that he is a great talent - all credit to MA and LJ for the recruitment work. In years to come he could be a Scott Murray if he continues to develop! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coxy27 Posted September 7, 2016 Report Share Posted September 7, 2016 4 hours ago, Nomad said: No reason there couldn't have been a clause like Tammy has to guarantee games. If he is going to sit in the reserves he'd be better off back here or on loan at a lower level with competitive games. Has it actually ever been confirmed that such a clause exists in the Tammy Abraham deal? I know a lot of us suspect something of this nature was agreed, but does anyone actually know? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nomad Posted September 7, 2016 Report Share Posted September 7, 2016 5 hours ago, Coxy27 said: Has it actually ever been confirmed that such a clause exists in the Tammy Abraham deal? I know a lot of us suspect something of this nature was agreed, but does anyone actually know? The TA thread mentions that LJ alluded to the fact. I've not heard it outright. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeAman08 Posted September 7, 2016 Report Share Posted September 7, 2016 6 hours ago, Coxy27 said: Has it actually ever been confirmed that such a clause exists in the Tammy Abraham deal? I know a lot of us suspect something of this nature was agreed, but does anyone actually know? MA and LJ spoke about this. Basically, if Tammy doesn't play enough games we can be charged a loan fee or he can be recalled. That's the short version anyway but yes, Tammy playing benefits us financially and squad size. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.