Full nelson Posted October 23, 2016 Report Share Posted October 23, 2016 Clearly we are a better side with two up front! How or can LJ do this regularly? And who would be dropped to play this from the off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shtanley Posted October 23, 2016 Report Share Posted October 23, 2016 O'Neil Smith Reid Tomlin Tammy Wilbraham Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeAman08 Posted October 23, 2016 Report Share Posted October 23, 2016 We don't have the personnel to play 2 up front. Only 3 strikers. One is 37 and can't play 90 minutes. Another hasn't stayed fit. Tomlin in the centre is basically our second striker anyway. The way we are playing is fine. Just need to get a bit more movement from our front 4 and the amount of strikers will be irrelevant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Colby-Tit Posted October 23, 2016 Report Share Posted October 23, 2016 I would love to see two up top, especially at home. However, LJ's hand is being forced at the moment, Alby can't compete for 90 mins and Engvall isn't quite ready yet. It's no secret that another striker is a priority, and if we are still top six in January we should be able to recruit well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Full nelson Posted October 23, 2016 Author Report Share Posted October 23, 2016 Tammy is great but unfortunately the gap is too big between him and LT at times! And when he gets muscled off the ball we are under pressure again. LJ will surely have to go two up top against Brighton as their two cb's will have TA under control and will win everything in the air once the long ball game starts being played due to Brighton frustrating our passing game. Yes we have 3 strikers but with one coming in January (probably) will that signing even play? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shtanley Posted October 29, 2016 Report Share Posted October 29, 2016 On 10/23/2016 at 12:52, Shtanley said: O'Neil Smith Reid Tomlin Tammy Wilbraham Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meh Posted October 29, 2016 Report Share Posted October 29, 2016 5 minutes ago, Shtanley said: Are you LJ? You got Lee in your name - kinda !! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bar BS3 Posted October 29, 2016 Report Share Posted October 29, 2016 On 23/10/2016 at 12:52, Shtanley said: O'Neil Smith Reid Tomlin Tammy Wilbraham I like it. I think playing Engval with Wilbs on the bench would be even stronger. I like Paterson too, but having him as an option if Reid isn't being ineffective. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daored Posted October 29, 2016 Report Share Posted October 29, 2016 On 23/10/2016 at 12:52, Shtanley said: O'Neil Smith Reid Tomlin Tammy Wilbraham Smart ass!!!!! Taken you a while Lee! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davefevs Posted October 29, 2016 Report Share Posted October 29, 2016 On 23/10/2016 at 12:52, Shtanley said: O'Neil Smith Reid Tomlin Tammy Wilbraham Tammy Wilbraham.....that's only one player up-front Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigTone Posted October 29, 2016 Report Share Posted October 29, 2016 On 23/10/2016 at 12:52, Shtanley said: O'Neil Smith Reid Tomlin Tammy Wilbraham Cunning plan 6 against 11 ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ivorguy Posted October 29, 2016 Report Share Posted October 29, 2016 Think this maybe our strongest side at the moment. Exciting, and, as always with Lee, unpredictable. Remember Lee knows the opposition inside out and has set us up accordingly Hope it will prove Lee is right yet again BELIEVE COYR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
archie andrews Posted October 29, 2016 Report Share Posted October 29, 2016 tammy tammy tammy tammy Wilbraham....ohhhhhhhh tammy tammy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redtucks Posted October 29, 2016 Report Share Posted October 29, 2016 7 minutes ago, archie andrews said: tammy tammy tammy tammy Wilbraham....ohhhhhhhh tammy tammy I think I prefer Aaron Abraham!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
downendcity Posted October 29, 2016 Report Share Posted October 29, 2016 8 minutes ago, Redtucks said: I think I prefer Aaron Abraham!!! Abraham Wibrahamovic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redtucks Posted October 29, 2016 Report Share Posted October 29, 2016 4 minutes ago, downendcity said: Abraham Wibrahamovic Yeah, him as well Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davefevs Posted October 29, 2016 Report Share Posted October 29, 2016 Tammy Aaron? Wasn't he a golfer? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedEyez Posted October 29, 2016 Report Share Posted October 29, 2016 48 minutes ago, Bar BS3 said: I like it. I think playing Engval with Wilbs on the bench would be even stronger. I like Paterson too, but having him as an option if Reid isn't being ineffective. So you'd take Reid off for being effective? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bar BS3 Posted October 29, 2016 Report Share Posted October 29, 2016 56 minutes ago, LeeTomlin10 said: So you'd take Reid off for being effective? Oops! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BCFC_Dan Posted October 29, 2016 Report Share Posted October 29, 2016 Two (effectively three) up front didn't work that well as all the strikers stayed central and there was a lack of width until they went 3-4-3 later on. I can see what LJ was aiming for but trying to get Abraham, Wilbraham and Tomlin in the team left them weak elsewhere. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
old_eastender Posted October 29, 2016 Report Share Posted October 29, 2016 2 minutes ago, BCFC_Dan said: Two (effectively three) up front didn't work that well as all the strikers stayed central and there was a lack of width until they went 3-4-3 later on. I can see what LJ was aiming for but trying to get Abraham, Wilbraham and Tomlin in the team left them weak elsewhere. The problem here is Wilbs, great for use as a sub but should never be starting games as has not get the movement or energy. Now Engval, based on his showing against Hull, certainly does have... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red Exile Posted October 29, 2016 Report Share Posted October 29, 2016 3 hours ago, old_eastender said: The problem here is Wilbs, great for use as a sub but should never be starting games as has not get the movement or energy. Now Engval, based on his showing against Hull, certainly does have... Delighted to say that having just watched Wilbs play a cracking 90 minutes he can start games and he has both movement and energy. Played very well today...one of our better players. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.