Chairman Mao Posted December 26, 2016 Report Share Posted December 26, 2016 The stupidest decision, the board are clearly inept, losing to mediocre teams like PNE, Wolves and Brentford. Not a leg to stand on. No win against Ipswich and he needs to go, one win since late October. Relagation form. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AshtonGreat Posted December 26, 2016 Report Share Posted December 26, 2016 It was a stupid decision. Typical of the City board Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tinman85 Posted December 26, 2016 Report Share Posted December 26, 2016 Another shocking decision in the Lansdown era. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cityloyal473 Posted December 26, 2016 Report Share Posted December 26, 2016 Shocking doesn't even cover it. There was absolutely no reason to extend his contract. None at all. Yet we did. Unbelievable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benjam!n Ultra Posted December 26, 2016 Report Share Posted December 26, 2016 17 minutes ago, Chairman Mao said: The stupidest decision, the board are clearly inept, losing to mediocre teams like PNE, Wolves and Brentford. Not a leg to stand on. No win against Ipswich and he needs to go, one win since late October. Relagation form. Why wait for Ipswich? Forget current form, our away form is even worse, we won't win there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shtanley Posted December 26, 2016 Report Share Posted December 26, 2016 Our team isn't good enough. The decision to give him a new contract was very strange but sacking him now would be even stranger. Things need to change but sacking him wouldn't help one bit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slack Bladder Posted December 26, 2016 Report Share Posted December 26, 2016 I think the board wanted to give a clear hands off message to other clubs. Mind you, our current form is pretty much sending out the same message. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chairman Mao Posted December 26, 2016 Author Report Share Posted December 26, 2016 7 minutes ago, Slack Bladder said: I think the board wanted to give a clear hands off message to other clubs. Mind you, our current form is pretty much sending out the same message. I don't get it, we had won a single game in a month and a half and they wanted to send a hands off message? Makes 0 sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slack Bladder Posted December 26, 2016 Report Share Posted December 26, 2016 20 minutes ago, Chairman Mao said: I don't get it, we had won a single game in a month and a half and they wanted to send a hands off message? Makes 0 sense. Well, perhaps they saw our current form and thought, this job is going to take longer than we thought, better give him another year, I don't know what was going through their minds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daored Posted December 26, 2016 Report Share Posted December 26, 2016 1 hour ago, tinman85 said: Another shocking decision in the Lansdown era. You can't be critical of SL, it's treason!!! A completely ridiculous situation to give a guy 12 months into the role such a long contract. As a club we should be offering two year contracts rolling , nothing more , nothing less. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.