Fiale Posted January 5, 2017 Report Share Posted January 5, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gazred Posted January 5, 2017 Report Share Posted January 5, 2017 I like the look of 4-1-2-1-2. It's flexible and suits the players we currently have. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fat Cigar Posted January 5, 2017 Report Share Posted January 5, 2017 I might be open to 3 CBs and wing-backs...after having trashed it continuously. Depends on us signing Bailey Wright. You'd then have Matthews and Bryan as wing backs. Which would suit Joe. One thing we have been told is Djuric is very much a striker who thrives on crosses. Matthews showed us last season he can cross. Bryan less so. We're not really a team who crosses it much at all, but that's got to change. Even a low cross on the ground. Tammy scored quite a few of his early goals from this type of delivery. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spike Posted January 5, 2017 Report Share Posted January 5, 2017 I think an odd issue to have is we now have a variety of tactics we can play as well as a number of line ups that could all be effective. The issue with that is that LJ hasn't yet settled with anything and if that continues having more options could actually be more of a hindrance than an advantage, what it all comes down to now is LJ and his ability to find his formation, starting 11 and sticking with it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Popodopolous Posted January 5, 2017 Report Share Posted January 5, 2017 7 minutes ago, Fat Cigar said: I might be open to 3 CBs and wing-backs...after having trashed it continuously. Depends on us signing Bailey Wright. You'd then have Matthews and Bryan as wing backs. Which would suit Joe. One thing we have been told is Djuric is very much a striker who thrives on crosses. Matthews showed us last season he can cross. Bryan less so. We're not really a team who crosses it much at all, but that's got to change. Even a low cross on the ground. Tammy scored quite a few of his early goals from this type of delivery. Has Matthews the stamina to play wing back? Need to be super fit for that role- Bryan on the left wing back would be excellent tbh, but unsure about Matthews. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fat Cigar Posted January 5, 2017 Report Share Posted January 5, 2017 8 minutes ago, Mr Popodopolous said: Has Matthews the stamina to play wing back? Need to be super fit for that role- Bryan on the left wing back would be excellent tbh, but unsure about Matthews. True. But Little can't cross. Either way, they all need to be sent on a crash course on crossing. And shooting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin phantom Posted January 5, 2017 Admin Report Share Posted January 5, 2017 Didn't like the sound of this comment to the BBC - or maybe it's a red herring? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
And Its Smith Posted January 5, 2017 Report Share Posted January 5, 2017 21 hours ago, spudski said: So far we have these players in the squad...and some possible/probable. Plenty of options for positions... Why does everyone spell Golbourne's name wrong?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkeh Posted January 5, 2017 Report Share Posted January 5, 2017 4 hours ago, phantom said: Didn't like the sound of this comment to the BBC - or maybe it's a red herring? don't see a problem with it, means we can have him up top as a target man to hit the long ball, or playing with a couple of attacking midfielder in behind him, give tomlin a free role to roam the space in bhind him while he holds up the ball, play tammy off of him chasing knock downs, gives us something we haven't really got at the moment, now if only we could sort the defense out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lanterne Rouge Posted January 5, 2017 Report Share Posted January 5, 2017 10 hours ago, Mr Popodopolous said: Has Matthews the stamina to play wing back? Need to be super fit for that role- Bryan on the left wing back would be excellent tbh, but unsure about Matthews. Joe yes but would sooner see Josh Brownhill at RWB than Adam Matthews. If we`ve got decent right sided CBs it shouldn`t be a problem and he has the energy and ability to do a good job I think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
funky monkey Posted January 5, 2017 Report Share Posted January 5, 2017 1 hour ago, RedDave said: Why does everyone spell Golbourne's name wrong?! Or maybe just maybe....Scott spells his name wrong and we've actually got it right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fiale Posted January 5, 2017 Report Share Posted January 5, 2017 3 hours ago, RedDave said: Why does everyone spell Golbourne's name wrong?! cough.... cough.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Engvall's Splinter Posted January 5, 2017 Report Share Posted January 5, 2017 2 hours ago, Red Right Hand said: Joe yes but would sooner see Josh Brownhill at RWB than Adam Matthews. If we`ve got decent right sided CBs it shouldn`t be a problem and he has the energy and ability to do a good job I think. Square pegs round holes. People berate Johnson for it (deservedly so) and then some suggest the same. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davefevs Posted January 5, 2017 Report Share Posted January 5, 2017 9 hours ago, phantom said: Didn't like the sound of this comment to the BBC - or maybe it's a red herring? Lets also remember that there is likely to be life without Tammy at some point in the future. I like the the personnel in the line-up posted by @Fiale, but I worry about the narrowness (is that a word?) and how exposed we would be down the sides. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.png.b717f72c0320930c89b72b5fcf5f7a26.png)
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.