Luxo Jr. Posted February 11, 2017 Report Share Posted February 11, 2017 Not really, but thought I'd get it in before anyone else does. 4-4-2, will be interesting to see how Taylor and Abraham play together. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AshtonG666 Posted February 11, 2017 Report Share Posted February 11, 2017 Taylor might have the element of surprise for a lot of Championship teams who maybe don't know much about him yet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobBobSuperBob Posted February 11, 2017 Report Share Posted February 11, 2017 Brave Concerned we will get overrun / outnumbered in middle of pitch plus is Tammy and MT should cause Derby some concerns Need those two , to do just that to take some away pressure off us - They are key IMHO Feed the Snake Feed the Snake Feed the snake and he will score Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strictly Obi Posted February 11, 2017 Report Share Posted February 11, 2017 Yes, I actually like this line up. But rest assured I will be slagging it off vehemently if we lose!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eddie Notgetinya Posted February 11, 2017 Report Share Posted February 11, 2017 I would maybe of had Djuric in for Tammy but that's the best team we could of started with today. COYR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tts_city Posted February 11, 2017 Report Share Posted February 11, 2017 442 great, i think the lineup looks good, djuric perhaps unlucky not to get a start after his goal last week. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fat Controller Posted February 11, 2017 Report Share Posted February 11, 2017 Can't see Engvall having much joy against Derby's defence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robin_unreliant Posted February 11, 2017 Report Share Posted February 11, 2017 Sooooo... we constantly start with one up front at home against bottom half teams - including Rotherham. But now is the time to go two up front - away at Derby. Really hope it works but can't fathom any logic in there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRISTOL86 Posted February 11, 2017 Report Share Posted February 11, 2017 I said in the week that I'd rather see us lose 7-6 going for it than lose 1-0 whilst playing for a 0-0. We cant keep goals out even if we line up 10-0-0 so why not go for it. We've created the most chances of any team in the league and scored more goals than teams in the top six. Why not go for it? We've shown we can create and take chances so let's play to our strengths. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
samo II Posted February 11, 2017 Report Share Posted February 11, 2017 1 minute ago, tts_city said: 442 great, i think the lineup looks good, djuric perhaps unlucky not to get a start after his goal last week. Agreed, but great option to throw on later in the game against a tired defence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnr1986 Posted February 11, 2017 Report Share Posted February 11, 2017 Don't get brownhill or little! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tts_city Posted February 11, 2017 Report Share Posted February 11, 2017 22 minutes ago, robin_unreliant said: Sooooo... we constantly start with one up front at home against bottom half teams - including Rotherham. But now is the time to go two up front - away at Derby. Really hope it works but can't fathom any logic in there. When tammy is uptop on his own he still does alot of closing down/harrying, wins the ball but doesnt have an outlet as he is the furthest up the pitch, hold it up for support, they get back, rinse repeat, now we have taylor as an outlet, best form of defence is attack, when you have the players for it of course and now we do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luxo Jr. Posted February 11, 2017 Author Report Share Posted February 11, 2017 2 minutes ago, Johnr1986 said: Don't get brownhill or little! Don't understand what's wrong with Brownhill. And Little is our only viable option - as much as Vyner could be a good option in future, Little does have experience on his side. Of course, this sort of match would be perfect for a fit Adam Matthews... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ashtonwurzel Posted February 11, 2017 Report Share Posted February 11, 2017 Lets hope that Derby don't just don't run through the centre of our midfield ! Brave shout from LJ, I've gone for over 11 corners @ 2/1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnr1986 Posted February 11, 2017 Report Share Posted February 11, 2017 1 minute ago, Luxo Jr. said: Don't understand what's wrong with Brownhill. And Little is our only viable option - as much as Vyner could be a good option in future, Little does have experience on his side. Of course, this sort of match would be perfect for a fit Adam Matthews... Just don't see what brownhill actually does just I fails to see what he actually brings to the midfield, as for little he may well be our only experience rb but his liabilities still cost us point most games so would rather see zak cyber there . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Watts Posted February 11, 2017 Report Share Posted February 11, 2017 Brownhill has a fantastic engine in him and in a two man midfield you need someone who can put themselves about a bit. Think its a good shout, personally. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tts_city Posted February 11, 2017 Report Share Posted February 11, 2017 Brownhill always puts in a terrific shift but tires badly around the 70 minute mark, hopefully we are clever with the subs today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luxo Jr. Posted February 11, 2017 Author Report Share Posted February 11, 2017 3 minutes ago, Johnr1986 said: Just don't see what brownhill actually does just I fails to see what he actually brings to the midfield, as for little he may well be our only experience rb but his liabilities still cost us point most games so would rather see zak cyber there . I think Brownhill does bring a lot to the team, as others have mentioned he's industrious and gets about a lot. I understand you're looking for a midfielder who does a specific job, like a central midfielder that's chiefly defensive, or just creative, but currently I don't think we have any, apart from maybe Smith, who does that. Pack is similar to Brownhill in not having one specific job, Hegeler too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robin_unreliant Posted February 11, 2017 Report Share Posted February 11, 2017 8 minutes ago, JonDolman said: I'm not so sure about this team away from home. Need an extra body in midfield to stop the likes of Hughes threading it through to the front three. Dont think hegeler covers a lot of ground so not an ideal pair to play against their 3. Excited by Taylor and tammy though, but would rather see it at home Exactly the point I was trying to make. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Murraysrightplum Posted February 11, 2017 Report Share Posted February 11, 2017 Ridiculous... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mrdc Posted February 11, 2017 Report Share Posted February 11, 2017 1 hour ago, Luxo Jr. said: Not really, but thought I'd get it in before anyone else does. 4-4-2, will be interesting to see how Taylor and Abraham play together. I actually agree but 2-0 isn't too shabby. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luxo Jr. Posted February 11, 2017 Author Report Share Posted February 11, 2017 1 minute ago, boatman said: I actually agree but 2-0 isn't too shabby. Agree with which bit, the thread title or the quote? Either way, not complaining. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smokey Posted February 11, 2017 Report Share Posted February 11, 2017 My mates words from our phone chat……. "3-0 FFS Johnson has to go. what was he thinking with that starting line up. Oh, what? Really? haha, we are 3-0 up? He's just got lucky then" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ivorguy Posted February 11, 2017 Report Share Posted February 11, 2017 442 is what got him out of trouble last season Let's hope he now knows his best 11 and best set up And let's enjoy the moment Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pnefcok Posted February 11, 2017 Report Share Posted February 11, 2017 5 hours ago, Johnr1986 said: Just don't see what brownhill actually does just I fails to see what he actually brings to the midfield, as for little he may well be our only experience rb but his liabilities still cost us point most games so would rather see zak cyber there . This was one of the problems that our fans had with him. He's one of those midfielders who just does a bit of everything. Some people like that and some don't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SedRA Posted February 11, 2017 Report Share Posted February 11, 2017 31 minutes ago, pnefcok said: This was one of the problems that our fans had with him. He's one of those midfielders who just does a bit of everything. Some people like that and some don't. Apparently was immense today despite the capitulation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.