Jump to content
IGNORED

If Magnusson doesn't start he doesn't play


ploppy

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Port Said Red said:

??

Just a reference to a comment made I think before the Derby game by LJ who basically said that Golbourne and Maggers wouldn't play if they don't start because they are specialists in their positions (justifying why he wasn't on the bench). Just amuses me that he's now put him on the bench which is a u turn from his comments above. I can understand the decision because of Little's injury but it does show how LJ maybe talks a little too much if he's forced to renege on his word a few weeks later!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ploppy said:

Just a reference to a comment made I think before the Derby game by LJ who basically said that Goldbourne and Maggers wouldn't play if they don't start because they are specialists in their positions (justifying why he wasn't on the bench). Just amuses me that he's now put him on the bench which is a u turn from his comments above. I can understand the decision because of Little's injury but it does show how LJ maybe talks a little too much if he's forced to renege on his word a few weeks later!

You could have wrote that as the opening message

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ploppy said:

Just a reference to a comment made I think before the Derby game by LJ who basically said that Golbourne and Maggers wouldn't play if they don't start because they are specialists in their positions (justifying why he wasn't on the bench). Just amuses me that he's now put him on the bench which is a u turn from his comments above. I can understand the decision because of Little's injury but it does show how LJ maybe talks a little too much if he's forced to renege on his word a few weeks later!

What he said was there are other players who play more than one position and they are more useful from the bence as they cover more positions. He didnt say he wouldnt put ever put them on the bench or that they wouldnt play if he did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ploppy said:

Just a reference to a comment made I think before the Derby game by LJ who basically said that Golbourne and Maggers wouldn't play if they don't start because they are specialists in their positions (justifying why he wasn't on the bench). Just amuses me that he's now put him on the bench which is a u turn from his comments above. I can understand the decision because of Little's injury but it does show how LJ maybe talks a little too much if he's forced to renege on his word a few weeks later!

So you can understand the decision was forced on him by injury, but still find an excuse to have a go. If he wasn't on the bench, there would be 50 posts about why he wont pick him despite the injuries and insinuating that they have fallen out.

1 minute ago, Rossi the Robin said:

You could have wrote that as the opening message

yes he could, but he would prefer to be obscure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, RichardEdd said:

What he said was there are other players who play more than one position and they are more useful from the bence as they cover more positions. He didnt say he wouldnt put ever put them on the bench or that they wouldnt play if he did.

Yeah but then there couldn't be a million threads a week finding something to have a go about. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll struggle to agree with any logic that dictates Magnusson doesn't start, regardless of what our start of season expectations were of him.

I doubt we thought Tammy would go 5m as a lone striker in the summer but did...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...