Monkeh Posted February 24, 2017 Report Share Posted February 24, 2017 22 minutes ago, AshtonG666 said: The problem is with SL is that he wants a yes man in charge, the second Cotts started showing his own mind and having his own voice, he was down the road quicker than you could shout grab your P45 yea because the results had no baring on that at all........ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gert Mare Posted February 24, 2017 Report Share Posted February 24, 2017 9 hours ago, TrowVegasCidered said: If the unthinkable does happen & City end up in L1. Given that he has spent £100m plus and not at least got to Premiership. Have there been any worse at managing the money/ club? ie Jack Walker - Premier League Dave Whelan - Premier league. But how much did Jack Hayward spend on Wolves? Did he get there? I just think if we go down we are an embarrassment tbh! Only one winner - George Reynolds of Darlington. Rovers will be next to build too big a ground for their actual support in the not too distant future. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkeh Posted February 24, 2017 Report Share Posted February 24, 2017 he's not even in the top 20 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glynriley Posted February 24, 2017 Report Share Posted February 24, 2017 1 hour ago, Monkeh said: yea because the results had no baring on that at all........ Well, results are certainly having no bearing on his decision making now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AshtonG666 Posted February 24, 2017 Report Share Posted February 24, 2017 10 hours ago, Monkeh said: yea because the results had no baring on that at all........ Off course they did, but LJ's run has been worse and he has not been sacked so Cotts character obviously played a part in it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 24, 2017 Report Share Posted February 24, 2017 20 hours ago, TrowVegasCidered said: If the unthinkable does happen & City end up in L1. Given that he has spent £100m plus and not at least got to Premiership. Have there been any worse at managing the money/ club? ie Jack Walker - Premier League Dave Whelan - Premier league. But how much did Jack Hayward spend on Wolves? Did he get there? I just think if we go down we are an embarrassment tbh! Did I miss something? Has SL decided he's had enough and has left? SL's success or failure can only be measured after he's left Your just making shit up, something that is becoming all too familiar on OTIB at the moment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AshtonG666 Posted February 24, 2017 Report Share Posted February 24, 2017 That SL video he released today is a joke Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobBobSuperBob Posted February 24, 2017 Report Share Posted February 24, 2017 15 minutes ago, AshtonG666 said: That SL video he released today is a joke They havnt moved comic relief from November have they Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alan Dicks Posted February 24, 2017 Report Share Posted February 24, 2017 20 hours ago, 54-46 said: At least he's prepared to spend it, unlike the fraud at the Gas What exactly has he had to spend? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarksRobin Posted February 24, 2017 Report Share Posted February 24, 2017 Most of us will remember the time when City had no backing of substance and were struggling in the third tier every year. Others will have even longer memories of the last time City were in the top flight, and the subsequent decline. SL has done a lot of positive work for our club, taking us to the brink of the Premier League. He may have made mistakes along the way but who hasn't. SL is a good owner who respects the clubs heritage and isn't looking at personal profit and we should be grateful for those things. Everyone's entitled to their own opinion but please show some respect because without SL this club will be in a worse position. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SecretSam Posted February 24, 2017 Report Share Posted February 24, 2017 The OP smacks of ingratitude. SC has invested more money than most of us will ever see in our club. Performance on the pitch is not his fault. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pongo88 Posted February 24, 2017 Report Share Posted February 24, 2017 Looking at it, from purely a City perspective, the worst must be the board that gave City players 10 year contracts in the old First Division days. Ten years? Yes ten years! What on earth were they drinking / smoking / injecting? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
REDOXO Posted February 24, 2017 Report Share Posted February 24, 2017 12 hours ago, Monkeh said: yea because the results had no baring on that at all........ Exactly! Now not quite so much of an issue! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.