Kingswoodactor Posted April 3, 2017 Report Share Posted April 3, 2017 Only changes I would make would be: Hordur for Bryan, Brownhill and Hegeler for O'Neil and Pack. Hodor deserves his chance, and has been shut out for far too long now. Added freshness in midfield, and Tomlin MUST stay closer to Tammy, like he was against Hudds. Hopeful of snatching a point up there like we usually do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JBFC II Posted April 3, 2017 Report Share Posted April 3, 2017 Fielding smith wright flint mags cotterill brownhil hegeler cod wilbs tammy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lenred Posted April 3, 2017 Report Share Posted April 3, 2017 16 minutes ago, Kingswoodactor said: Only changes I would make would be: Hordur for Bryan, Brownhill and Hegeler for O'Neil and Pack. Hodor deserves his chance, and has been shut out for far too long now. Added freshness in midfield, and Tomlin MUST stay closer to Tammy, like he was against Hudds. Hopeful of snatching a point up there like we usually do. Completely agree. As a minimum Hegeler and Hordur must come in. Bryan has to be dropped after a really really poor run of form and Hegeler was head and shoulders above the rest when he came on Saturday so comes in for O'Neill. Not too worried about the other change with Brownhill for Pack but certainly wouldn't be against it. I'd probably keep Pack to start, just...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kingswoodactor Posted April 3, 2017 Author Report Share Posted April 3, 2017 12 minutes ago, JBFC II said: Fielding smith wright flint mags cotterill brownhil hegeler cod wilbs tammy Actually Wilbs could be a decent shout for starting alongside Tammy. Especially if he gives the type of performance like he did up at Newcastle, where he absolutely battered their centre-backs! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JBFC II Posted April 3, 2017 Report Share Posted April 3, 2017 Just now, Kingswoodactor said: Actually Wilbs could be a decent shout for starting alongside Tammy. Especially if he gives the type of performance like he did up at Newcastle, where he absolutely battered their centre-backs! He always seems to score v Preston so I'd give him a game and allow Tammy some more room Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tears in rain Posted April 3, 2017 Report Share Posted April 3, 2017 GK- Fielding LB- Mags CB- Wright CB- Flint RB- Smith CM- Brownhill CM- Hegeler RM- cotts LM- COD CAM- Tomlin ST- Tammy Stick with the 4-2-3-1 it's been the most used and therefore most well known formation for the players Tomlin cannot drop back like he has been recently as it will isolate Tammy. At points Tomlin has been further behind the ball then pack or GON was. We don't get the best out of him or Tammy as a result. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
And Its Smith Posted April 3, 2017 Report Share Posted April 3, 2017 Baffling why you'd all have Hegeler as part of a two man midfield. Assuming anyone wanting this didn't see him look completely lost and stroll around against Fulham. Id play . Fielding Vyner. Flint. Wright. Magnusson Reid. Smith. Hegeler Cotterill. Abraham. O Dowda Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kingswoodactor Posted April 3, 2017 Author Report Share Posted April 3, 2017 7 minutes ago, RedDave said: Baffling why you'd all have Hegeler as part of a two man midfield. Assuming anyone wanting this didn't see him look completely lost and stroll around against Fulham. Id play . Fielding Vyner. Flint. Wright. Magnusson Reid. Smith. Hegeler Cotterill. Abraham. O Dowda If we based everyone on their performance against Fulham 'that' night, we'd surely struggle to pick anyone. Vyner back in for a massive game? Now that is baffling. I'm also sure that changing formation 'again' is just what we need at this point... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tears in rain Posted April 3, 2017 Report Share Posted April 3, 2017 12 minutes ago, RedDave said: Baffling why you'd all have Hegeler as part of a two man midfield. Assuming anyone wanting this didn't see him look completely lost and stroll around against Fulham. Id play . Fielding Vyner. Flint. Wright. Magnusson Reid. Smith. Hegeler Cotterill. Abraham. O Dowda Just now, Kingswoodactor said: If we based everyone on their performance against Fulham 'that' night, we'd surely struggle to pick anyone. Vyner back in for a massive game? Now that is baffling. I'm also sure that changing formation 'again' is just what we need at this point... I do think Hegeler will play best as the Central midfielder of a 3 man midfield. Flanked by Reid and Brownhill could be the best we get. However we've had so many formation changes it would be hard to implement a new formation just from 1 training session. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roadrunner Posted April 3, 2017 Report Share Posted April 3, 2017 We need a point, so 1,5,4,1, get to work on it Lee. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
And Its Smith Posted April 3, 2017 Report Share Posted April 3, 2017 5 hours ago, Kingswoodactor said: If we based everyone on their performance against Fulham 'that' night, we'd surely struggle to pick anyone. Vyner back in for a massive game? Now that is baffling. I'm also sure that changing formation 'again' is just what we need at this point... Nobody else to play right back. Smith needed in midfield as GON injured and can't rely on Pack to dominate. I'd rather be weak at right back than central midfield. Pretty sure professional players at our level can cope with 4-3-3 Irrelevent anyway as Johnson will pick a baffling line up I suspect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vincent Vega Posted April 3, 2017 Report Share Posted April 3, 2017 The Inept Clown hasn't many friends left it would seem, be interesting to see tomorrow's lottery selection around 7pm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Portland Bill Posted April 3, 2017 Report Share Posted April 3, 2017 2 minutes ago, Vincent Vega said: The Inept Clown hasn't many friends left it would seem, be interesting to see tomorrow's lottery selection around 7pm This weeks balls will be a special away kit set Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vincent Vega Posted April 3, 2017 Report Share Posted April 3, 2017 Just now, Portland Bill said: This weeks balls will be a special away kit set What formation is that ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Portland Bill Posted April 3, 2017 Report Share Posted April 3, 2017 28 minutes ago, Vincent Vega said: What formation is that ? That gets decided later, this ones for the player selection! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vincent Vega Posted April 3, 2017 Report Share Posted April 3, 2017 Just now, Portland Bill said: That gets decided later, this ones for the player selection! Actually I think Johnson may have cracked it .......finally Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CyberDan Posted April 3, 2017 Report Share Posted April 3, 2017 I reckon we ask the EFL for some kind of temporary "american football" based dispensation that allows us to switch the team between 10 Defensive and 10 Offensive players depending on how we are doing!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BCFChayden Posted April 3, 2017 Report Share Posted April 3, 2017 I'd stick with same team. Tomorrow will tell us what we need to know then in my opinion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kodjias Wrist Posted April 3, 2017 Report Share Posted April 3, 2017 I know this aint team related but surprised to see only 150 odd going tomorrow night that is terrible for a championship tie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reddoh Posted April 3, 2017 Report Share Posted April 3, 2017 I think a team for Preston would a very good idea, quite novel really. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tts_city Posted April 3, 2017 Report Share Posted April 3, 2017 We have played the same team twice now, so he is probably itching to get back to the previous tried and trusty teampicking methodology: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tinman85 Posted April 3, 2017 Report Share Posted April 3, 2017 11 hours ago, Tears in rain said: GK- Fielding LB- Mags CB- Wright CB- Flint RB- Smith CM- Brownhill CM- Hegeler RM- cotts LM- COD CAM- Tomlin ST- Tammy Stick with the 4-2-3-1 it's been the most used and therefore most well known formation for the players Tomlin cannot drop back like he has been recently as it will isolate Tammy. At points Tomlin has been further behind the ball then pack or GON was. We don't get the best out of him or Tammy as a result. Joe Bryan will never be dropped. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tinman85 Posted April 3, 2017 Report Share Posted April 3, 2017 3.5.2 is the best formation surely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tears in rain Posted April 3, 2017 Report Share Posted April 3, 2017 1 hour ago, tinman85 said: Joe Bryan will never be dropped. Can only wish and this is the team i would want to see Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pnefcok Posted April 4, 2017 Report Share Posted April 4, 2017 Not sure how we are going to line up. We've played 4-4-2 for the last few months but we struggled on Saturday in the first half because Forest had an extra man in midfield. We reverted to 3-5-2 in the second half and it worked. However we don't normally play that system at home so it's anyone's guess as to which formation we play really. As for personnel, Baptiste will probably come in after his return from injury, Robinson may start after making a good impact when he came on vs Forest, and Hugill hasn't been playing great recently so Makienok may come in. Our key players (IMHO) are Pearson, McGeady (top, top quality player), and at the moment, Barkhuizen too (5 goals in 5 starts). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FNQ Posted April 4, 2017 Report Share Posted April 4, 2017 13 minutes ago, pnefcok said: Not sure how we are going to line up. We've played 4-4-2 for the last few months but we struggled on Saturday in the first half because Forest had an extra man in midfield. We reverted to 3-5-2 in the second half and it worked. However we don't normally play that system at home so it's anyone's guess as to which formation we play really. As for personnel, Baptiste will probably come in after his return from injury, Robinson may start after making a good impact when he came on vs Forest, and Hugill hasn't been playing great recently so Makienok may come in. Our key players (IMHO) are Pearson, McGeady (top, top quality player), and at the moment, Barkhuizen too (5 goals in 5 starts). Agree 100% with you on McGeady... Do you think you'll be able to keep him longer term? What sort of reception will Bailey receive and do you miss him? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pnefcok Posted April 4, 2017 Report Share Posted April 4, 2017 10 hours ago, FNQ said: Agree 100% with you on McGeady... Do you think you'll be able to keep him longer term? What sort of reception will Bailey receive and do you miss him? I don't think we've missed him a lot, and that doesn't mean I don't rate him or didn't want him to stay but Huntington and Andy Boyle (new January signing from Dundalk) have slotted in just fine for him. I think he'll receive a ripple of applause for Wembley and then down to business. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.