Jump to content
IGNORED

New goalkeeper shirt idea


WRERE

Recommended Posts

  • Admin
16 minutes ago, WRERE said:

Wycombe's new goalkeeper shirts have been made to try and distract the opposing strikers by implementing an kaleidoscope design

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/2017/07/06/wycombe-wanderers-unveil-kaleidoscope-goalkeeper-kit-designed/

 

 

What about their own players when they are looking at their keeper?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Umm.... think City decided, against all scientific evidence, that dressing our players up in the naffest possible training wear will not impact on performance. 

As Cotts used to say, it's all about the 0.1% differences at the top of professional sport.

LJ clearly has a different take on things. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, WRERE said:

Wycombe's new goalkeeper shirts have been made to try and distract the opposing strikers by implementing an kaleidoscope design

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/2017/07/06/wycombe-wanderers-unveil-kaleidoscope-goalkeeper-kit-designed/

 

 

Studies have been ongoing for years and the most common outcomes are that orange is the most distracting colour and that patterns are actually less effective due to the time a striker glances up and the time it takes to see the keeper. Orange is almost instant to see, whilst patterns tend to "blend" with the background meaning a striker is less pressured when shooting. So, either O'Neills have done better studies than the majority of in-depth researchers as well as companies like Nike and Adidas or they're just making s*** up to sell shirts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Spike said:

Studies have been ongoing for years and the most common outcomes are that orange is the most distracting colour and that patterns are actually less effective due to the time a striker glances up and the time it takes to see the keeper. Orange is almost instant to see, whilst patterns tend to "blend" with the background meaning a striker is less pressured when shooting. So, either O'Neills have done better studies than the majority of in-depth researchers as well as companies like Nike and Adidas or they're just making s*** up to sell shirts.

If they are trying to sell shirts, then that's even more of an epic fail..! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Spike said:

Studies have been ongoing for years and the most common outcomes are that orange is the most distracting colour and that patterns are actually less effective due to the time a striker glances up and the time it takes to see the keeper. Orange is almost instant to see, whilst patterns tend to "blend" with the background meaning a striker is less pressured when shooting. So, either O'Neills have done better studies than the majority of in-depth researchers as well as companies like Nike and Adidas or they're just making s*** up to sell shirts.

Maybe they thought about it differently.

Situations where the head is up for longer it may be more distracting.

But if, as you say, orange is the most distinctive and easily seen, the player will have a rough idea where the 'keeper is from it catching his eye.

A pattern blending in means he won't see/will delay the shot so he can see where the goalkeeper is and aim away. That extra little time could be vital.

 

In all likelyhood, the difference either way is probably so small as to mean nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, JamesBCFC said:

Maybe they thought about it differently.

Situations where the head is up for longer it may be more distracting.

But if, as you say, orange is the most distinctive and easily seen, the player will have a rough idea where the 'keeper is from it catching his eye.

A pattern blending in means he won't see/will delay the shot so he can see where the goalkeeper is and aim away. That extra little time could be vital.

 

In all likelyhood, the difference either way is probably so small as to mean nothing.

Im of the same mindset. I think if the GK blends into the crowd then the attacking playermay for a split second not instantly know where the GK is. However depending on the type of player they may see it as a open goal and may give them a little boost. 

As you say the difference is so tiny whatever way you look at it it's not really likely to make too much difference. 

If it did give the defending team an advantage as a manager id have my own GK playing in that same shirt it training for the week to get used to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...