Lrrr Posted January 23, 2018 Report Share Posted January 23, 2018 Was anyone else confused as to how only 5 minutes were added on? I mean De Bruyne's goal made it irrelevant but 3 subs at 30 seconds each (generous for Walker's) - 1:30, 2 goals add an extra 30 seconds each 2:30, surely 30 seconds to a minute should have been added for each of the times the Man City fans played around with the ball? So at least 4 mins at this point if not more, then the injuries to Reid and Walker and I was expecting at least 7/8 minutes of extra time to be added, could have been a difference maker if we'd had more than just 1 min left or so after our goal if we had an extra 3/4 minutes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BS3_RED Posted January 23, 2018 Report Share Posted January 23, 2018 I think the ref took pity on us Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lrrr Posted January 23, 2018 Author Report Share Posted January 23, 2018 Just now, BS3_RED said: I think the ref took pity on us So much for that when Flint scored, only needed 1 more to take it to extra time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bcfctim Posted January 23, 2018 Report Share Posted January 23, 2018 Have a token like. Walker alone was down for 3 minutes. It was outrageous. Didn't seem important but then we score and suddenly it has a massive impact Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Odd socks Posted January 23, 2018 Report Share Posted January 23, 2018 Should have been a minimum of 7 mins...We was robbed!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex_BCFC Posted January 23, 2018 Report Share Posted January 23, 2018 Yeh maybe - not sure it really mattered but 7 mins was probably more like it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeAman08 Posted January 23, 2018 Report Share Posted January 23, 2018 Thought most things referee wise went Man City’s way tbf. Nothing crazy but anything little they either got away with or was called against us. Stuff like Stones falling and handling the ball and nothing. Then ball bounces up on Bryan with his arms at his side and whistle goes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamesBCFC Posted January 24, 2018 Report Share Posted January 24, 2018 21 minutes ago, JoeAman08 said: Thought most things referee wise went Man City’s way tbf. Nothing crazy but anything little they either got away with or was called against us. Stuff like Stones falling and handling the ball and nothing. Then ball bounces up on Bryan with his arms at his side and whistle goes. To be fair, Flint almost caught the ball in the first half and got away with it. But in general Man City did seem to get the advantages. Plus the blatant yellow card that wasn't given- ref played advantage, but didn't book the player at the next break in play, despite the offence being a cynical foul. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeAman08 Posted January 24, 2018 Report Share Posted January 24, 2018 1 minute ago, JamesBCFC said: To be fair, Flint almost caught the ball in the first half and got away with it. But in general Man City did seem to get the advantages. Plus the blatant yellow card that wasn't given- ref played advantage, but didn't book the player at the next break in play, despite the offence being a cynical foul. Didn’t see the Flint one. Wasn’t a horrid ref just think he gave them the benefit of the doubt and did not for us. We were already well up against it and they didn’t need any extra advantages. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamesBCFC Posted January 24, 2018 Report Share Posted January 24, 2018 1 minute ago, JoeAman08 said: Didn’t see the Flint one. Wasn’t a horrid ref just think he gave them the benefit of the doubt and did not for us. We were already well up against it and they didn’t need any extra advantages. Flint on was first half, a deep cross, ball seemed to almost trap temporarily between his arm and the post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paulcityfan Posted January 24, 2018 Report Share Posted January 24, 2018 4 minutes would have been OK. We would have drawn 2-2 and my £20 on a 2-2 draw would have netted 6 big ones Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lrrr Posted January 24, 2018 Author Report Share Posted January 24, 2018 Just now, paulcityfan said: 4 minutes would have been OK. We would have drawn 2-2 and my £20 on a 2-2 draw would have netted 6 big ones Ouch, if it makes you feel any worse their 3rd actually came after the allotted extra time even adding our goal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paulcityfan Posted January 24, 2018 Report Share Posted January 24, 2018 2 minutes ago, hodge said: Ouch, if it makes you feel any worse their 3rd actually came after the allotted extra time even adding our goal I know, doh, I thought I'd done it again. I got £20 at 16/1 for a 2-1 on the Man Red game Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AshtonGreat Posted January 24, 2018 Report Share Posted January 24, 2018 8 hours ago, hodge said: So much for that when Flint scored, only needed 1 more to take it to extra time. And then Man City scored another Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tinman85 Posted January 24, 2018 Report Share Posted January 24, 2018 Should have been 7 mins surely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LondonBristolian Posted January 24, 2018 Report Share Posted January 24, 2018 I think there is a stat somewhere that the ball is only in play for something like 65 minutes of the average game. So additional time is always understated based on that and should usually be about 10 minutes per half... Walker was down long enough for me to decide he had been down a while, go to the toilet and come back and sit and wait a while for play to start. At least four minutes. At the same time I expected 5 minutes to be added on. I think officials are reluctant to do more than 5 minutes unless there is an extremely serious injury. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Port Said Red Posted January 24, 2018 Report Share Posted January 24, 2018 The end of the game seemed a bit surreal. I couldn't hear the whistle so, it looked like Manchester scored and all the players and the benches just went, "fair enough, we'll call it a day there". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lrrr Posted January 24, 2018 Author Report Share Posted January 24, 2018 2 hours ago, AshtonGreat said: And then Man City scored another Said that at the top, but if we had say 4 minutes left after flint's goal rather than less than a minute it may have been a bit different Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AshtonGreat Posted January 24, 2018 Report Share Posted January 24, 2018 1 hour ago, hodge said: Said that at the top, but if we had say 4 minutes left after flint's goal rather than less than a minute it may have been a bit different No, I agree with you. I think the problem is that piling loads of people forward to grab another goal – which we inevitably had to do – is suicide against a team of Man City's quality. Their third goal proved that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Popodopolous Posted January 24, 2018 Report Share Posted January 24, 2018 1 hour ago, hodge said: Said that at the top, but if we had say 4 minutes left after flint's goal rather than less than a minute it may have been a bit different Agreed. Said the same to my mate last night at the game...'if only it had been 5 mins earlier'. As it was we had no choice but to continue to push it all as we were so deep into stoppage time and the 3rd is no huge surprise in those circs... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aizoon Posted January 24, 2018 Report Share Posted January 24, 2018 Sorry, but it seemed about right to me... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unan Posted January 24, 2018 Report Share Posted January 24, 2018 Walker was done for 4 alone.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamesBCFC Posted January 24, 2018 Report Share Posted January 24, 2018 2 hours ago, Port Said Red said: The end of the game seemed a bit surreal. I couldn't hear the whistle so, it looked like Manchester scored and all the players and the benches just went, "fair enough, we'll call it a day there". Someone as I was leaving suggested the goal was ruled out. As the players left the pitch straight after it meant I left the game unsure of the result. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aizoon Posted January 24, 2018 Report Share Posted January 24, 2018 9 minutes ago, JamesBCFC said: Someone as I was leaving suggested the goal was ruled out. As the players left the pitch straight after it meant I left the game unsure of the result. Now you know what it's like to be a Dolman part-timer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobintheRed Red Posted January 24, 2018 Report Share Posted January 24, 2018 16 hours ago, hodge said: Was anyone else confused as to how only 5 minutes were added on? I mean De Bruyne's goal made it irrelevant but 3 subs at 30 seconds each (generous for Walker's) - 1:30, 2 goals add an extra 30 seconds each 2:30, surely 30 seconds to a minute should have been added for each of the times the Man City fans played around with the ball? So at least 4 mins at this point if not more, then the injuries to Reid and Walker and I was expecting at least 7/8 minutes of extra time to be added, could have been a difference maker if we'd had more than just 1 min left or so after our goal if we had an extra 3/4 minutes. Too be fair it was that controversial crap ref that done the Arsenal v Chelsea game Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.