Jump to content
IGNORED

markings for the worst preformance to date


cityred exile

Recommended Posts

Fielding 6.5

Pisano 5

Flint 6.5

Wright 5 (I thought defensively he was ok, it was on the ball he struggled)

Bryan 6

Brownhill 5

Smith 5

Walsh 4.5

Kent 1 (for a volley pass to Fam - that was it, perhaps with Stroud as ref, we thought we’d play with 10.  It was an awful 55 minutes - I almost didn’t include him)

Reid 4

Diedhiou 6

——————-

Pato 5

Djuric5

Kelly 6

——————-

Johnson (and backroom staff, analysts etc) 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fielding 8 Distribution aside he kept us in it

pisano 4 looks still lacking in fitness

flint 6 best defender we had, but that wasn’t hard

wright 3 shocking

bryan 2 even worse

brownhill 6 only player to put in some energy and that goalline clearance was outstanding

smith 5 ran around a lot but not the player he was in december

walsh 3 shouldn’t have started over pack 

Kent 2 forgot he was playing

reid 4 ran around a lot but don’t think he touched the ball

diedhiou 6 only player who looked like he might have a shot

 

subs

paterson 6 brought some directness

kelly 6 felt for him coming on in that horror show but he looked assured

duric 5 not what we needed

johnson 3 got it wrong but only so much he can do when the team plays so badly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reality check

FF 8

EP 5

AF 7

BW 4

JoeB 6

JoshB 7

LW 5

KS 6 

RK 4

FD 5

BR 6

Frankie kept us in it.

Flint was his usual self

Walsh despite some good early touches, looked lightweight and out of his depth

Bryan looked like he was injured early and had no help

Nothing came off for Smith or Bobby

Josh running on empty

Duric did more in his cameo than Fam

Kent lacking in confidence and form. Offered very little

Pisano off the pace

Bailey Wright  had a shocker

I don't like being negative with players but I couldn't see any positives with our captain's performance today.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, JBFC II said:

Fielding 8 Distribution aside he kept us in it

pisano 4 looks still lacking in fitness

flint 6 best defender we had, but that wasn’t hard

wright 3 shocking

bryan 2 even worse

brownhill 6 only player to put in some energy and that goalline clearance was outstanding

smith 5 ran around a lot but not the player he was in december

walsh 3 shouldn’t have started over pack 

Kent 2 forgot he was playing

reid 4 ran around a lot but don’t think he touched the ball

diedhiou 6 only player who looked like he might have a shot

 

subs

paterson 6 brought some directness

kelly 6 felt for him coming on in that horror show but he looked assured

duric 5 not what we needed

johnson 3 got it wrong but only so much he can do when the team plays so badly

Fielding 8 ? His distribution today caused us so many problems. 

He made lots of Dave's but all I would expect him to make.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The sad thing is it doesn't feel as though a are 1 point off the top 6. If we had lost 1.0 after hitting the woodwork, their keeper making great saves etc then this place would be feeling we still have a chance.but today was a team on its knees devoid of ideas 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Spoons said:

Fielding 8 ? His distribution today caused us so many problems. 

He made lots of Dave's but all I would expect him to make.

His distribution was poor but he made the scoreline look respectable, made at least 3 top quality saves

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fielding 5 Made a couple of good saves. Distribution poor still.

Pisano 4 Doesn't look fully fit.

Flint 5 Looked like he hadn't played for 3 weeks.

Wright 3 Exposed by the lack of Pack. Terrible passing.

Bryan 4 Not at his best. Still think he is a better midfielder than defender.

Smith 5 Compromised by having so little support in central midfield.

Walsh 2 Out of his depth & too lightweight. The most pointing since Kilkenny left (and I really disliked him).

Brownhill 5 Endeavour and desire including for the goal line clearance.

Kent 1 The less said the better.

Diedhiou 6 Kept trying and showed some good touches but no service or support. Unlucky to be subbed.

Reid 4 Worse game all season. Looked very lacklustre & lifeless.

Subs

Paterson 3 Better than Kent but that was a very low bar.

Kelly 5 Looks classy and ready to play at this level.

Djuric 5 Tried hard but not helped by terrible refereeing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Super said:

Fielding 5

Bryan 3

Wright 3

Flint 4

Pisano 3

Kent 3

Walsh 4

Smith 4

Brownhill 5

Reid 3

Diedhiou 4

Subs

Patto 2

Kelly 5

Djuric 4

This is more like it. Maybe a tad harsh on Frankie but the rest were abysmal, every bloody one of the starting 11 was a disgrace! 

I'll add Johnson - 2. Poor choice and a game that was crying out for Baker and Pack yet both stayed sat on their arses. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Davefevs said:

Fielding 6.5

Pisano 5

Flint 6.5

Wright 5 (I thought defensively he was ok, it was on the ball he struggled)

Bryan 6

Brownhill 5

Smith 5

Walsh 4.5

Kent 1 (for a volley pass to Fam - that was it, perhaps with Stroud as ref, we thought we’d play with 10.  It was an awful 55 minutes - I almost didn’t include him)

Reid 4

Diedhiou 6

——————-

Pato 5

Djuric5

Kelly 6

——————-

Johnson (and backroom staff, analysts etc) 2

I have highlighted the funny bit; so without touching the ball, presumably his positional play, his body checking, his tackling and his fouls he was good? Maybe this is what he should be told in future. Can hear it from Dean on the touchline... "Dont touch it Bailey" . Anything is worth a try with his form.

On a more serious note you have been rather generous giving him a 5 if you compare others.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess a 5 rating is what you would be marking for a player putting in an average performance, what you would expect, no more no less? Do we really think many of our players were Championship average yesterday?

Did many players really do their jobs yesterday? Some are being marked as above average in the threads above, really? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...