Jump to content
IGNORED

Can't beat a bit of VAR


Kingswood Robin

Recommended Posts

A penalty was awarded after players had already left the pitch for half-time in Mainz's Bundesliga win over relegation rivals Freiburg on Monday.

Referee Guido Winkmann called both sides back from the dressing room after consulting the video assistant referee (VAR) system and penalising Freiburg for handball.

They even had to switch the sprinklers off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only use that I can see for the video is reviewing decisions that the refs make surrounding foul play. You can appeal red cards, but you should be able to appeal yellows, but also look at diving, simulation and violence post match. Each team starts the season with 5 appeals. If you're successful, you get to keep it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

Referee Guido Winkmann calls Mainz and Freiburg players back onto the pitch at half-time

A penalty was awarded after players had already left the pitch for half-time in Mainz's Bundesliga win over relegation rivals Freiburg on Monday.

Referee Guido Winkmann called both sides back from the dressing room after consulting the video assistant referee (VAR) system and penalising Freiburg for handball.

Mainz midfielder Pablo de Blasis scored the penalty to put the hosts 1-0 up.

"It leaves a bitter taste," Freiburg sporting director Jochen Saier said.

Speaking to Eurosport at half-time, he added that they had to "accept it with a heavy heart".

"We were under the impression that when the referee blows for half-time that's it," said Saier.

The second half was delayed by fans throwing toilet paper onto the pitch, which was not related to the penalty decision but instead a protest against Bundesliga fixtures being played on Monday nights.

De Blasis scored a second on 78 minutes to secure victory, taking Mainz above Freiburg on goal difference and eight points clear of automatic relegation, while putting the visitors into the relegation play-off spot in 16th.

Mainz initially had the penalty appeal turned down after right-back Daniel Brosinski's cross deflected off Freiburg centre-back Marc-Oliver Kempf's hand and was saved by keeper Alexander Schwolow.

As the players departed the pitch, Winkmann was told to consult VAR and ran over to the other side of the pitch to watch the replay on a monitor.

Winkmann overturned the decision and awarded the hosts a penalty before having to recall the entire Freiburg side and the handful of Mainz players who had left the pitch.

Following a delay of over six minutes De Blasis scored the penalty in the bottom left corner and Winkmann blew again for half-time, during which the unfortunate Kempf was substituted.

De Blasis added a lucky second as his shot rolled over the line after hitting the inside of the post, with Schwolow out of his goal having passed the ball straight to Mainz midfielder Robin Quaison.

image.png

Analysis

European football writer Andy Brassell on BBC Radio 5 live

Potentially one of the most vital goals in the fight at the bottom, but a new low for VAR.

The ref maybe shouldn't have sent them off as quickly, it depends on how quickly VAR contacted him.

The problem is not the technology, it is the process. I can't understand why referees are involved in the decision-making process at all, if it is to be used for clear and obvious errors, surely the VAR has to tell the referee what the decision is.

In this case you've got a couple thousand fans off to the bar and they come back thinking it is 0-0.

I still think the penalty is debatable.

image.png

image.gif

image.gif

image.gif

image.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Danny Murphy put it brilliantly on the Debate show, VAR is taking one persons opinion (the ref) and passing that onto another person to deal with. Plus football is a contact sport and imo opinion VAR is seen as contact = foul. England vs Italy prime example, also Mane vs Palace, if VAR was used I’m 99% sure they would have said it was a penalty even though there was nowhere near enough contact to bring the player down/stop him being able to carry on with play. 

Goal line thechnology will do for me, no more, no less. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

VAR should only be used for reviewing scenarios with definite answers, such as over the line, offside, in/out of box. Possibly handball but that can be subjective too unless they change the rule.

Everything else is opinion. 

Football has been ruined by TV analysing every tiny detail on one of the 3million cameras inside each ground. At full-pace fast-tempo top-flight level, Gary Neville or Chris Sutton can't possibly say "this player intended" or "that player attempted". Even the players probably don't know half the time, its instinct. 

The World Cup is going to be a JOKE.

And personally, I quite like the idea of "he got away with one there"...it adds to the flavour of football. And before the PC millennials get on it, the game misses characters like Vinnie Jones, Roy Keane, Cantona, Viera, Gattuso etc., who wouldn't last 5 mins in a game nowadays :facepalm:  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...