Meh Posted September 4, 2018 Report Share Posted September 4, 2018 12 minutes ago, handsofclay said: Count me in as well. This is a football forum. Just because Rugby is played at AG doesn't mean it is suddenly allowed on a football forum. Billy Graham and the Rolling Stones have also played at AG but that doesn't mean we should allow rock music threads and interpretations of passages from The Bible to creep onto this football forum. Agreed - let’s discuss the name John and rim ass whilst we are at it - yawn !! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
handsofclay Posted September 4, 2018 Report Share Posted September 4, 2018 21 minutes ago, Luxo Jr. said: I feel like they're both just as irrelevant. One is a non-football related post about something that happened within a football programme. One is about a non-football event that took place within a football stadium. But the something that happened within the football programme involved a Bristol City supporter. I would say that that is relevant and of interest. It might not be that interesting but it is still related to football and Bristol City FC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nogbad the Bad Posted September 4, 2018 Report Share Posted September 4, 2018 1 hour ago, Neo said: Agreed - let’s discuss the name John and rim ass whilst we are at it - yawn !! Atyeo or Galley? Here you are Neo, try starting a Bristol City FC football topic on here and let us know how you get on : http://www.rugbynetwork.net/boards/list/s100.htm Or perhaps this is where Rugby enthusiasts should be posting in the first place? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
REDOXO Posted September 4, 2018 Report Share Posted September 4, 2018 On 03/09/2018 at 06:01, Never to the dark side said: If you wanna listen on the play again thingy it is 1.54.52 into 606 I always enjoy listening to your post match reports NTTDS. I agree letting people know that bloke wasn't you but some faux Johnny come lately John is good idea as their could have been confusion...you are a legend sir! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
underhanded Posted September 4, 2018 Report Share Posted September 4, 2018 Haha In all seriousness thought that our 'John' was a pretty astute supporter and made some good points. Lot better than the usual maniac that calls into 606 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Never to the dark side Posted September 4, 2018 Author Report Share Posted September 4, 2018 Who is the usual manic that rings into 606,cos that definitely ain't me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobBobSuperBob Posted September 4, 2018 Report Share Posted September 4, 2018 6 hours ago, Never to the dark side said: Who is the usual manic that rings into 606,cos that definitely ain't me. No it’s another John Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redtucks Posted September 5, 2018 Report Share Posted September 5, 2018 My name is Dave. But I'm known as Rodney. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedZepperin Posted September 6, 2018 Report Share Posted September 6, 2018 I am disappointed that we had to wait until Monday for this matter to be clarified. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A Horse With No Name Posted September 6, 2018 Report Share Posted September 6, 2018 On 03/09/2018 at 17:48, Vespa Red said: I'm Jon. It's a cunning disguise. I sometimes hide behind the "h" I'm Joan....... I used to be John Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nogbad the Bad Posted September 6, 2018 Report Share Posted September 6, 2018 On 04/09/2018 at 17:38, Never to the dark side said: Who is the usual manic that rings into 606,cos that definitely ain't me. Janet Street- Preacher. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedYoshi Posted September 6, 2018 Report Share Posted September 6, 2018 If someone really wanted to be an arse, they’d use this opportunity to remind everyone that it’s “rugby football” and “association football”, and thus a “Football Chat” forum which has the subtitle of “All things football” in no way prioritises one over the other. But no-one’s going to be that much of an arse, are they? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.