whooosh Posted August 10, 2004 Report Share Posted August 10, 2004 According to the main site report, in the 2nd half City came out in a 4-4-2 formation with Tinnion and Murray out wide. So 0-0 with 4-3-3, to 2-1 with 4-4-2, that shoots down a lot of the postings on here about formations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevedon Red Posted August 10, 2004 Report Share Posted August 10, 2004 According to the main site report, in the 2nd half City came out in a 4-4-2 formation with Tinnion and Murray out wide. So 0-0 with 4-3-3, to 2-1 with 4-4-2, that shoots down a lot of the postings on here about formations. ← The radio commentary continually mentioned 433 and I know who I would believe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
court_bcfc Posted August 10, 2004 Report Share Posted August 10, 2004 It really does. i still think 3-5-2 would be the best option Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wayne allisons tongues Posted August 10, 2004 Report Share Posted August 10, 2004 According to radio this was not so and can you call tins an out and out left midfielder if so and murray was supposedly drifting around so 4-4-2 was not neccesarily played. think more like 4-2-2-2 formation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
court_bcfc Posted August 10, 2004 Report Share Posted August 10, 2004 It really does. i still think 3-5-2 would be the best option Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest TinmansCulturedLeftPeg Posted August 10, 2004 Report Share Posted August 10, 2004 The analyst on the radio seems pretty stubborn though so I dunno,I wasn't there so I dunno.... But if City did come out in a 4-4-2 in the second half with Tinnion filling in wide left then fair play Tinman mate....but I still didn't understand the custom formation in the first place.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest TinmansCulturedLeftPeg Posted August 10, 2004 Report Share Posted August 10, 2004 can you call tins an out and out left midfielder← He played his whole life wide on the left flank until a couple of years ago!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Desso Posted August 10, 2004 Report Share Posted August 10, 2004 Sh.. or bust. 1 - 10 is the best option. For this to work we need another couple of forwards but I'm sure we'll have them by Saturday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevedon Red Posted August 10, 2004 Report Share Posted August 10, 2004 Sh.. or bust. 1 - 10 is the best option. For this to work we need another couple of forwards but I'm sure we'll have them by Saturday. ← Time for a rumour? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whooosh Posted August 10, 2004 Author Report Share Posted August 10, 2004 Well, we know who you would believe! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex_mike Posted August 10, 2004 Report Share Posted August 10, 2004 if it was 4-4-2 in the second half we let in 2 and scored 1 and with 4-3-3 we diden't score or let any in so 3-5-2 at home and 5-3-2 away! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.