Jump to content
IGNORED

Reported Salaries


Tomo

Recommended Posts

20 minutes ago, Tomo said:

Not sure how accurate these are but interesting that it states 15k per week for Nahki on his old contract.... ?

https://www.capology.com/club/bristol/salaries/

So Ayman Benarous is on more than double Semenyo's wage and on more than Alex Scott. Seems reasonable. :whistle:

  • Haha 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, And Its Smith said:

Football Manager is probably a much closer estimate 

I suspect football manager is the source of some of these!

@Tomofirstly, salary info isn’t in the public domain, so anything these types of website list can’t be taken as being correct.

Some might be a good estimate, because something was leaked at the time of signing, but most will be guesswork, educated guesswork in some cases…and some will be wildly out.  But these sites are also not up to date.  The same sites had Danny Simpson on £18k p.w. last season.

Don’t forget a lot of contracts these days (and in the past too) will be based on a basic salary plus a series of add-ons, mainly appearance based, but not forgetting annual contract bonuses, or even increases based on targets hit.

So, although we can all guess at wages, they are just that….guesses.

Even Kasey Palmer who said in a court of law that he was on £110k p.m (not p.w) when at Chelsea, didn’t necessarily mean when he signed for us he was on that here.  We may have offered him less, but 4 year deal sweetened it, or we paid him a signing in fee.

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Davefevs said:

I suspect football manager is the source of some of these!

@Tomofirstly, salary info isn’t in the public domain, so anything these types of website list can’t be taken as being correct.

Some might be a good estimate, because something was leaked at the time of signing, but most will be guesswork, educated guesswork in some cases…and some will be wildly out.  But these sites are also not up to date.  The same sites had Danny Simpson on £18k p.w. last season.

Don’t forget a lot of contracts these days (and in the past too) will be based on a basic salary plus a series of add-ons, mainly appearance based, but not forgetting annual contract bonuses, or even increases based on targets hit.

So, although we can all guess at wages, they are just that….guesses.

Even Kasey Palmer who said in a court of law that he was on £110k p.m (not p.w) when at Chelsea, didn’t necessarily mean when he signed for us he was on that here.  We may have offered him less, but 4 year deal sweetened it, or we paid him a signing in fee.

 

Yep all guess work Fevs.... I wouldn't expect Naismith to be on 15k per week imho. He came from Luton. Possibly on 8k to 10k though.... ?

Edited by Tomo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Major Isewater said:

I don’t believe any of it but just watch people start to have a go at James for being overpaid and the club for underpaying Semenyo, Max etc . 

Exhibit A:

1 hour ago, Negan said:

Probably isn’t too far from the truth tbf. Be surprised if Semenyo is happy to stay on that for another 18 months. Makes sense for him to either sign a 3 year deal or force a move away

 

  • Like 2
  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Negan said:

Probably isn’t too far from the truth tbf. Be surprised if Semenyo is happy to stay on that for another 18 months. Makes sense for him to either sign a 3 year deal or force a move away

You reckon we signed Sykes on bigger wages than Dasilva…?!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Andy082005 said:

There is no way Matty James is on £27k

 

He was reportedly on over £30k pw at Leicester. Whilst we certainly won’t be paying him £27k pw, he will be one of the highest earners and definitely over £15k. He wouldn’t have come here for less than half the wage he was already on. 

34 minutes ago, Tomo said:

Yep all guess work Fevs.... I wouldn't expect Naismith to be on 15k per week imho. He came from Luton. Possibly on 8k to 10k though.... ?

Don’t be so sure mate. As far as I understood it, and I was advised of this upon his signing, £15k is very close to the mark. 
Whilst Luton are not the highest payers, Naismith was in demand and as we know, Gould has said that we will still pay top 10 wages in free agency. I’d very confidently say that £15k pw is correct. 

  • Like 1
  • Hmmm 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Harry said:

He was reportedly on over £30k pw at Leicester. Whilst we certainly won’t be paying him £27k pw, he will be one of the highest earners and definitely over £15k. He wouldn’t have come here for less than half the wage he was already on. 

Don’t be so sure mate. As far as I understood it, and I was advised of this upon his signing, £15k is very close to the mark. 
Whilst Luton are not the highest payers, Naismith was in demand and as we know, Gould has said that we will still pay top 10 wages in free agency. I’d very confidently say that £15k pw is correct. 

All guesswork.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Davefevs said:

I suspect football manager is the source of some of these!

@Tomofirstly, salary info isn’t in the public domain, so anything these types of website list can’t be taken as being correct.

Some might be a good estimate, because something was leaked at the time of signing, but most will be guesswork, educated guesswork in some cases…and some will be wildly out.  But these sites are also not up to date.  The same sites had Danny Simpson on £18k p.w. last season.

Don’t forget a lot of contracts these days (and in the past too) will be based on a basic salary plus a series of add-ons, mainly appearance based, but not forgetting annual contract bonuses, or even increases based on targets hit.

So, although we can all guess at wages, they are just that….guesses.

Even Kasey Palmer who said in a court of law that he was on £110k p.m (not p.w) when at Chelsea, didn’t necessarily mean when he signed for us he was on that here.  We may have offered him less, but 4 year deal sweetened it, or we paid him a signing in fee.

A few years back I had to train the Payroll team at Liverpool football club on the new software we installed. They were different to Chelsea and Manchester Utd in that the players payroll was in house, rather than through an agency like PWC.

No figures were ever mentioned, but I was surprised by some of the "bonuses" player s would receive, like a loyalty bonus for staying for the 2nd year of a 3 year contract. Other things like a signing on fee being spread over the period of the contract on a quarterly, half year, or yearly basis, were interesting. As was the idea that they loved having options as to where to send the payslips because "players don't get their payslips, agents do!" :) 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Port Said Red said:

A few years back I had to train the Payroll team at Liverpool football club on the new software we installed. They were different to Chelsea and Manchester Utd in that the players payroll was in house, rather than through an agency like PWC.

No figures were ever mentioned, but I was surprised by some of the "bonuses" player s would receive, like a loyalty bonus for staying for the 2nd year of a 3 year contract. Other things like a signing on fee being spread over the period of the contract on a quarterly, half year, or yearly basis, were interesting. As was the idea that they loved having options as to where to send the payslips because "players don't get their payslips, agents do!" :) 

Did you ever see a pay ratchet? A clause or something that says "if another player gets a wage rise or gets paid more than I do, then my pay goes up by X%, or matches it, or is reviewed etc". I've heard they do exist in some contracts, but suspect they're pretty unusual.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Davefevs said:

I suspect football manager is the source of some of these!

@Tomofirstly, salary info isn’t in the public domain, so anything these types of website list can’t be taken as being correct.

Some might be a good estimate, because something was leaked at the time of signing, but most will be guesswork, educated guesswork in some cases…and some will be wildly out.  But these sites are also not up to date.  The same sites had Danny Simpson on £18k p.w. last season.

Don’t forget a lot of contracts these days (and in the past too) will be based on a basic salary plus a series of add-ons, mainly appearance based, but not forgetting annual contract bonuses, or even increases based on targets hit.

So, although we can all guess at wages, they are just that….guesses.

Even Kasey Palmer who said in a court of law that he was on £110k p.m (not p.w) when at Chelsea, didn’t necessarily mean when he signed for us he was on that here.  We may have offered him less, but 4 year deal sweetened it, or we paid him a signing in fee.

 

I don’t think it is the source.  If I look at wages on FM I very rarely think many seem ridiculous. I would say it’s pretty simple to guess close to accurate.  Debate on Naismith above for example….no transfer fee will have a strong impact on wage/loyalty bonus. I don’t think transfer fee gets considered by everyone when trying to estimate wages.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Port Said Red said:

A few years back I had to train the Payroll team at Liverpool football club on the new software we installed. They were different to Chelsea and Manchester Utd in that the players payroll was in house, rather than through an agency like PWC.

No figures were ever mentioned, but I was surprised by some of the "bonuses" player s would receive, like a loyalty bonus for staying for the 2nd year of a 3 year contract. Other things like a signing on fee being spread over the period of the contract on a quarterly, half year, or yearly basis, were interesting. As was the idea that they loved having options as to where to send the payslips because "players don't get their payslips, agents do!" :) 

I believe loyalty bonuses and signing on fees being spread over a contract are common practise across football nowadays 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, ExiledAjax said:

Did you ever see a pay ratchet? A clause or something that says "if another player gets a wage rise or gets paid more than I do, then my pay goes up by X%, or matches it, or is reviewed etc". I've heard they do exist in some contracts, but suspect they're pretty unusual.

I think that could only possibly happen if the players had the same agent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Harry said:

Not in the case of Naismith it’s not. 

Of course it is. The only way it wouldn’t be is if you are the one who drew up the contract. You mentioned that James is “definitely” on 15k+, again, you are either assuming or pretending to be itk. Reality is like most you just don’t know. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Vidal said:

Of course it is. The only way it wouldn’t be is if you are the one who drew up the contract. You mentioned that James is “definitely” on 15k+, again, you are either assuming or pretending to be itk. Reality is like most you just don’t know. 

Sometimes people will know for a fact. I’m friends with a brother of a former city player in the 90s and knew what he was getting paid 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, And Its Smith said:

I don’t think it is the source.  If I look at wages on FM I very rarely think many seem ridiculous. I would say it’s pretty simple to guess close to accurate.  Debate on Naismith above for example….no transfer fee will have a strong impact on wage/loyalty bonus. I don’t think transfer fee gets considered by everyone when trying to estimate wages.   

That’s why I said “some”.  Perhaps if I said football manager might be used as a reference / guide for ones they have no idea about, that might be a better statement.

25 minutes ago, Marcus Aurelius said:

Remember a few years ago when an employee left a sheet of paper with all the players wages in a coffee shop in Clifton?

I still think that was crap. Looked all a bit too simple.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know Lansbury was on a decent wedge, 17k+, he’s from Potters Bar & has a house in Welham Green (AL9 7something, briefly lived there with ex mrs) unsure who the relations were but they loved to talk about his money at any chance possible, never saw Lansbury myself.

Edited by Marcus Aurelius
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...