Jump to content
IGNORED

Awful ITV Coverage


westonred

Recommended Posts

To me the hightlight of the match yesterday was the amazing bit of skill and trickery Scotty did, twisting and turning away from 3 or 4 players to realease Nakhi to set up the goal for Bell.

On the EFL programme last night they decided not to show his sublime bit of skilll only to show the pass. If a player from a more fashionable club had done that the studio pundits would have been jizzing, and showing it time and time again

At least they didnt show us last again this week

  • Like 7
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, westonred said:

To me the hightlight of the match yesterday was the amazing bit of skill and trickery Scotty did, twisting and turning away from 3 or 4 players to realease Nakhi to set up the goal for Bell.

On the EFL programme last night they decided not to show his sublime bit of skilll only to show the pass. If a player from a more fashionable club had done that the studio pundits would have been jizzing, and showing it time and time again

At least they didnt show us last again this week

That was disappointing, but for me the interesting bit was the pundits saying that we were exciting going forward with Bell, Wells etc, and then saying "and of course Alex Scott behind them", like it was a given that he's so good he doesn't need to be mentioned.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, westonred said:

To me the hightlight of the match yesterday was the amazing bit of skill and trickery Scotty did, twisting and turning away from 3 or 4 players to realease Nakhi to set up the goal for Bell.

On the EFL programme last night they decided not to show his sublime bit of skilll only to show the pass. If a player from a more fashionable club had done that the studio pundits would have been jizzing, and showing it time and time again

At least they didnt show us last again this week

For your purpose, I hope ITV give better coverage for the FA Cup game!

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, shahanshahan said:

For your purpose, I hope ITV give better coverage for the FA Cup game!

Well Tyldesley or Matterface will be chatting away about some other game for most of the 90, either previous Man City games, or the ones they have coming up. Mention of the lack of VAR will come up around 10 times as well.

Then their top notch production team will probably switch to an advert for Honda or something similar, just as we score. 

As you can see, I don't trust their ability to do a good job one jot, which is part of the reason I would prefer to part with £30 to watch without them.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, westonred said:

To me the hightlight of the match yesterday was the amazing bit of skill and trickery Scotty did, twisting and turning away from 3 or 4 players to realease Nakhi to set up the goal for Bell.

On the EFL programme last night they decided not to show his sublime bit of skilll only to show the pass. If a player from a more fashionable club had done that the studio pundits would have been jizzing, and showing it time and time again

At least they didnt show us last again this week

The lack of coverage Scott gets the better I would say ??

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.bcfc.co.uk/news/highlights-preston-north-end-1-2-bristol-city/

 

Watch this version. The commentator was giving out stats at the time of Alex's masterclass. However, on the replay the bloke says it was "Brilliant".

Was this the same commentator as the itv version?

If not, whoever he is....well done good sir. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I also wanted to see the players doing their American Football/Basketball routine of encouragement after defending for a goal kick near the final whistle. Gary Owers was really impressed on radio brizz commentary. Sadly it wasn't shown. The defending was though. Wow. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Port Said Red said:

That was disappointing, but for me the interesting bit was the pundits saying that we were exciting going forward with Bell, Wells etc, and then saying "and of course Alex Scott behind them", like it was a given that he's so good he doesn't need to be mentioned.

I think a massively impressive thing about our recent performances is that, whilst Scott may well be the finest talent the club has ever developed, we are not in any way a one man team. I did not see the show but I can easily believe the pundits genuinely initially forgot to mention Scott due to how well the forward three played.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Davefevs said:

Low in “pretty football” qualify.

High in “grit, guts, physical, hardworking” quality.

Yep. Low in softness; high in hardness - softness being a 'quality' we've demonstrated for too long and seemed to have abandoned, the softness we demonstrated when we played prettily at Norwich in September...and lost.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, pongo88 said:

In tonight’s meagre coverage the match was described as being “low in quality”. That’s not the match I watched 

I really enjoyed the game it but it wasn't a high quality game. Defensively we were fantastic but we could have been better going forward.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, pongo88 said:

In tonight’s meagre coverage the match was described as being “low in quality”. That’s not the match I watched 

We got better coverage than last week..........which was the first time I had watched the ITV4 version and thought it was shocking!! The Sheffield United Woman player who was analysing did say that we had too much work to do to get the play-offs, which is fair if you look at it logically (teams have defied logic before but never the Gas as their logic trumps all) and that our bad run earlier in the season coincided with injuries. She, unlike many other guests on these shows, appears to have at least a grain of knowledge about us......either that or simply bothered to find out before commenting which seems to be beyond many doing her job.

On the game itself, lots of pretty backwards and sideways from Norwich and their £30K per week plus players but no cutting edge simply because our lot went old school and "got stuck in". Someone on here yesterday described their midfield as "all fur coat and no knickers"..........that was Norwich City, full stop, yesterday. Fifteen shots in 90 minutes according to the BBC stats which some on here use to judge the game and only three were threatening, the rest literally wouldn't have bothered some Suburban League Division 5 goalkeeper on Pitch 5 at The Netham. We do break with real quality at times, or hurt teams in transition as seems to be the en-vogue terminology, although taking everything into account I could understand a "neutral" over 90 minutes thinking the game wasn't high on true quality.

I think the vast majority of us were buzzing at 4:55pm yesterday, that's all that counts!!

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Numero Uno said:

We got better coverage than last week..........which was the first time I had watched the ITV4 version and thought it was shocking!!

She, unlike many other guests on these shows, appears to have at least a grain of knowledge about us......either that or simply bothered to find out before commenting which seems to be beyond many doing her job.

Whilst I agree she seemed knowledgeable, pretty certain it’s scripted for them, note the iPad’s! Last week Dean Ashton appeared to know every player each club had bought and sold in January - I have trouble just remembering what went on at Ashton Gate!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, East End Old Boy said:

Whilst I agree she seemed knowledgeable, pretty certain it’s scripted for them, note the iPad’s! Last week Dean Ashton appeared to know every player each club had bought and sold in January - I have trouble just remembering what went on at Ashton Gate!

1st time I've watched it for yonks, 1st impression, box-ticking at its ugliest

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Red Cloud said:

1st time I've watched it for yonks, 1st impression, box-ticking at its ugliest

I can't watch it. Remember in the 90's or early 00's when ITV had the rights and Gabriel Clarke used to stand on the pitch and do a recorded piece to camera pre feature match, sometimes as the teams ran out? Thinking about it now, it was so long ago, I wonder if it actually happened?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Davefevs said:

Low in “pretty football” qualify.

High in “grit, guts, physical, hardworking” quality.

 

1 hour ago, Super said:

I really enjoyed the game it but it wasn't a high quality game. Defensively we were fantastic but we could have been better going forward.

I’ve got to agree with you that it was perhaps low in “quality” football but I still think the match wasn’t “low in quality”.  This may seem strange but it depends on how you regard football. It’s obviously a game but, at professional level, it’s also entertainment as people pay to watch. For me the match was very entertaining even though it was a bit hectic. It was end to end and the result was in doubt until the final whistle. I’m sure most of the City supporters went away happy and a few people in the pub afterwards said it was one of the best matches they had seen this season. Not because of the quality of the football but because of the quality of the entertainment 

  • Like 4
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Numero Uno said:

We got better coverage than last week..........which was the first time I had watched the ITV4 version and thought it was shocking!! The Sheffield United Woman player who was analysing did say that we had too much work to do to get the play-offs, which is fair if you look at it logically (teams have defied logic before but never the Gas as their logic trumps all) and that our bad run earlier in the season coincided with injuries. She, unlike many other guests on these shows, appears to have at least a grain of knowledge about us......either that or simply bothered to find out before commenting which seems to be beyond many doing her job.

On the game itself, lots of pretty backwards and sideways from Norwich and their £30K per week plus players but no cutting edge simply because our lot went old school and "got stuck in". Someone on here yesterday described their midfield as "all fur coat and no knickers"..........that was Norwich City, full stop, yesterday. Fifteen shots in 90 minutes according to the BBC stats which some on here use to judge the game and only three were threatening, the rest literally wouldn't have bothered some Suburban League Division 5 goalkeeper on Pitch 5 at The Netham. We do break with real quality at times, or hurt teams in transition as seems to be the en-vogue terminology, although taking everything into account I could understand a "neutral" over 90 minutes thinking the game wasn't high on true quality.

I think the vast majority of us were buzzing at 4:55pm yesterday, that's all that counts!!

That was me ???

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Davefevs said:

That was me ???

 

True though. If ever judging 15 shots by one team in a game was a completely incorrect way of determining how the game went, yesterday was that game. Norwich were a team of good individual footballers, man for man better than ours (except Scott who is better than anything they have) and they do get paid triple/quadruple in most cases, but very rarely hurt us all afternoon. Wagner agreed that they never hurt us all afternoon.

Edited by Numero Uno
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Numero Uno said:

True though. If ever judging 15 shots by one team in a game was a completely incorrect way of determining how the game went, yesterday was that game. Norwich were a team of good individual footballers, man for man better than ours (except Scott who is better than anything they have) and they do get paid triple/quadruple in most cases, but very rarely hurt us all afternoon. Wagner agreed that they never hurt us all afternoon.

 

B7B97D00-3093-4D39-A260-6FD55B61E38D.jpeg

4F14161F-6082-48D1-8A01-D3892BD851D2.jpeg
we had 4 chances better than their best one according to xG

image.png.1903ad88134636be92f33d07de1e9b80.png

whatever you think of xG, I think its a fair reflection that we created the better chances.

Edited by Davefevs
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...