Jump to content
IGNORED

Penalties- PGMOL


Mr Popodopolous

Recommended Posts

On 04/10/2023 at 08:49, 1960maaan said:

So the Sykes challenge , because it was boot to boot , was not a Pen.
So, a challenge, by a defender, which he has no contact with the ball but his boot has contact with the strikers boot ?
AKA Trip ?

I want to see the same explanation saying Prings was, elbow to throat and so does not constitute a Pen as it was clearly against Bristol City :yes:

I want to hear their explanation for the assault on Bell last night

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not just penalties either, seemingly..although this seems like the sort of sneaky foul thst would be a trademark of a Neil side but the PGMOL have said it wasn't a foul?! Anyway it led to the Southampton winner but it is sly...and merits being penalised as such IMO

Stoke should have had a penalty in this game however. I agree with that.

03:16.

Edited by Mr Popodopolous
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apparently the ref on Saturday gave Stoke nothing , favoured us etc.

Surely if he was leaning our way Pring may have got a pen??

Some even suggest Saturday's ref had an agenda against them..the Oatcake of course.

Arm in the face play on in the box is an agenda eh. Maybe he didn't like their managers shithousing tactics? I thought he was quite generous towards them tbh.

One eyed man, Kingdom of the Blind etc.

Edited by Mr Popodopolous
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some clubs seem to get the benefit a bit more.

I'd it was a foul, it was a soft call to be disallowing the Preston goal- would have made 2-1.

Leicester 2nd goal was offside too. Saw lines drawn, definitely offside when ball was played.

EFL highlights commentator on ITV4 said Bell was half a shout?? Only half.

Edited by Mr Popodopolous
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Mr Popodopolous said:

Apparently the ref on Saturday gave Stoke nothing , favoured us etc.

Surely if he was leaning our way Pring may have got a pen??

Some even suggest Saturday's ref had an agenda against them..the Oatcake of course.

Arm in the face play on in the box is an agenda eh. Maybe he didn't like their managers shithousing tactics? I thought he was quite generous towards them tbh.

One eyed man, Kingdom of the Blind etc.

Also Oatcake in the immediate aftermath of Gooch clattering into Sykes in the box:

'Not sure how Gooch gets away with that.'

'Lucky as ****.'
'Definitely a penalty'

'How the hell was that not a pen to Bristol?'

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...