Admin phantom Posted November 29, 2023 Admin Report Share Posted November 29, 2023 The game was goal less going into injury time when this happened Obvious contact? Keeper drops the ball? What the below doesn't show is the ref just gave a drop ball which is how the keeper got ball Goal is awarded, Wycombe also get a player sent off for arguing with the referee I'd be checking betting accounts after this one Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fordy62 Posted November 29, 2023 Report Share Posted November 29, 2023 Clear foul for me. Soft, but defo a foul. 2 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fanjita Posted November 29, 2023 Report Share Posted November 29, 2023 (edited) If that keeper ever goes shopping in Broadmead he would spend all his time on the ground, player barely touched him and he goes down, no foul Edited November 29, 2023 by fanjita 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cidercity1987 Posted November 29, 2023 Report Share Posted November 29, 2023 Keeper time wasting, baiting the striker to come and get the ball before grabbing it. A very soft barge and keeper goes over. Its probably a foul but not that controversial to me Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loco Rojo Posted November 29, 2023 Report Share Posted November 29, 2023 Keeper going down like that highlights everything wrong with this sport. Clearly over doing it and looking to influence the ref. If he'd stayed standing when he was barged, the ref would've probably given the foul for the contact. Keeper fell over like a toddler. Got what he deserved. 7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChubStixx Posted November 29, 2023 Report Share Posted November 29, 2023 Play silly games... 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LondonBristolian Posted November 29, 2023 Report Share Posted November 29, 2023 (edited) The goalkeeper definitely makes the most of it but I still don’t get how it wasn’t given as a foul as there was obvious contact and literally no way the forward could be trying to legally play the ball when it was in the keeper’s hands. I do think there are certain circumstances where a foul should be given AND the fouled player be booked for simulation. Edited November 29, 2023 by LondonBristolian 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fanjita Posted November 29, 2023 Report Share Posted November 29, 2023 Coming into contact with another player doesn’t constitute a foul, as said previously this is what’s wrong with today’s game, trying to con the referee at every opportunity, no other word for it but cheating, referees are criticised continuously but players need to take a long hard look at themselves, it’s embarrassing 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Posted November 29, 2023 Report Share Posted November 29, 2023 Keeper didn't look overly bothered with the decision! 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robbored Posted November 29, 2023 Report Share Posted November 29, 2023 It was legitimate goal. When two players come shoulder to shoulder (which frequently happens) no one notices. That’s what happened here. Idiotic goalkeeping………… 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
red panda Posted November 29, 2023 Report Share Posted November 29, 2023 Karma for a keeper playing silly buggers and a pretty pathetic team. Totally his fault for letting go of the ball after throwing himself to the ground. Why were Wycombe time wasting in injury time when the score was still 0-0? Imagine if you travelled all the way up to Barnsley on a freezing midweek evening to watch your team give up trying to win. Is a bore draw at Oakwell really the height of their ambitions?? Deserve everything they got Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Posted November 29, 2023 Report Share Posted November 29, 2023 Just now, red panda said: Karma for a keeper playing silly buggers and a pretty pathetic team. Totally his fault for letting go of the ball after throwing himself to the ground. Why were Wycombe time wasting in injury time when the score was still 0-0? Imagine if you travelled all the way up to Barnsley on a freezing midweek evening to watch your team give up trying to win. Is a bore draw at Oakwell really the height of their ambitions?? Deserve everything they got In fairness if its 0-0 tonight in injury time do you think we won't be wasting some time? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ciderwithtommy Posted November 29, 2023 Report Share Posted November 29, 2023 30 minutes ago, Robbored said: It was legitimate goal. When two players come shoulder to shoulder (which frequently happens) no one notices. That’s what happened here. Idiotic goalkeeping………… Wrong. law 12 - A goalkeeper cannot be challenged by an opponent when in control of the ball with the hand(s). 2 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redstart Posted November 29, 2023 Report Share Posted November 29, 2023 30 minutes ago, red panda said: Karma for a keeper playing silly buggers and a pretty pathetic team. Totally his fault for letting go of the ball after throwing himself to the ground. Why were Wycombe time wasting in injury time when the score was still 0-0? Imagine if you travelled all the way up to Barnsley on a freezing midweek evening to watch your team give up trying to win. Is a bore draw at Oakwell really the height of their ambitions?? Deserve everything they got Yep, if you're gonna throw yourself to the ground like you've been shot, at least hang on to the ball til the ref blows his whistle Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TV Tom Posted November 29, 2023 Report Share Posted November 29, 2023 He got what he deserved but 99.9% of the time a foul would of been given 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robbored Posted November 29, 2023 Report Share Posted November 29, 2023 7 minutes ago, ciderwithtommy said: Wrong. law 12 - A goalkeeper cannot be challenged by an opponent when in control of the ball with the hand(s). You’re right - obviously the referee doesn’t know the laws either. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
red panda Posted November 29, 2023 Report Share Posted November 29, 2023 42 minutes ago, Super said: In fairness if its 0-0 tonight in injury time do you think we won't be wasting some time? I hope not. And please leave fairness out of it, this is OTIB FFS 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cityexile Posted November 29, 2023 Report Share Posted November 29, 2023 55 minutes ago, Super said: In fairness if its 0-0 tonight in injury time do you think we won't be wasting some time? If its 0-0 in the last minute of injury time and we have possession in their half, the thought 'take it in to the corner you silly bugger' might conceivably cross my mind... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robbored Posted November 29, 2023 Report Share Posted November 29, 2023 24 minutes ago, Robbored said: You’re right - obviously the referee doesn’t know the laws either. Unless the ref didn’t see the collision as a ‘challenge’ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kingswood Robin Posted November 29, 2023 Report Share Posted November 29, 2023 I agree he got what he deserved for taking the mick, and I'd like to see referees let more of this go. However, for 40 years at least, any sort of contact with a keeper is given as a foul. Sometimes just jumping in the air next to the keeper at a corner is a foul apparently. Given this, I am surprised the goal was allowed to stand. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A Horse With No Name Posted November 29, 2023 Report Share Posted November 29, 2023 1 hour ago, Robbored said: You’re right - obviously the referee doesn’t know the laws either. When did it change from hands to hand? I was always taught that if a keeper had one hand on the ball it was still in play. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LondonBristolian Posted November 29, 2023 Report Share Posted November 29, 2023 56 minutes ago, A Horse With No Name said: When did it change from hands to hand? I was always taught that if a keeper had one hand on the ball it was still in play. I think the key phrase is “control of the ball” - as I understand it, the ball is in play if the keeper has one hand on it in a goal mouth scramble but not if the keeper is standing with it firmly in their hand. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AppyDAZE Posted November 29, 2023 Report Share Posted November 29, 2023 The ref never gives that if it's the away side scoring. Yes goalkeepers can be annoying, but you can't just push them over. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
W-S-M Seagull Posted November 29, 2023 Report Share Posted November 29, 2023 3 hours ago, Super said: Keeper didn't look overly bothered with the decision! I always look at players reactions as the reaction says a lot. In this instance it seemed as if the keeper knew he was to blame. Absolutely zero outrage from him for what people are calling a huge injustice. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davefevs Posted November 29, 2023 Report Share Posted November 29, 2023 22 minutes ago, LondonBristolian said: I think the key phrase is “control of the ball” - as I understand it, the ball is in play if the keeper has one hand on it in a goal mouth scramble but not if the keeper is standing with it firmly in their hand. I seem to recall something along the lines of if the keeper has the ball in one hand but pressure on it, ie when it’s on the ground, he’s considered to be in control. So a bit like a try in rugby when they have to apply pressure. I might’ve got the interpretation wrong, but the old “two hands” shout wasn’t as defined as I thought. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A Horse With No Name Posted November 29, 2023 Report Share Posted November 29, 2023 2 minutes ago, Davefevs said: I seem to recall something along the lines of if the keeper has the ball in one hand but pressure on it, ie when it’s on the ground, he’s considered to be in control. So a bit like a try in rugby when they have to apply pressure. I might’ve got the interpretation wrong, but the old “two hands” shout wasn’t as defined as I thought. Do you remember the Forest player who crept up behind the keeper who was holding the ball in one hand, and nodded it off him to score. Maybe that's when it was changed. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
And Its Smith Posted November 29, 2023 Report Share Posted November 29, 2023 Well done ref. That keeper should be ashamed of himself Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
italian dave Posted November 29, 2023 Report Share Posted November 29, 2023 3 hours ago, Super said: In fairness if its 0-0 tonight in injury time do you think we won't be wasting some time? Just thinking the same. And, if that got allowed against us, I think most of us would be fuming. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
italian dave Posted November 29, 2023 Report Share Posted November 29, 2023 23 minutes ago, W-S-M Seagull said: I always look at players reactions as the reaction says a lot. In this instance it seemed as if the keeper knew he was to blame. Absolutely zero outrage from him for what people are calling a huge injustice. I thought that he just assumed he’d get a free kick. That was why there was no reaction - at least, not until he realised the goal was given. But who knows! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davefevs Posted November 29, 2023 Report Share Posted November 29, 2023 1 hour ago, A Horse With No Name said: Do you remember the Forest player who crept up behind the keeper who was holding the ball in one hand, and nodded it off him to score. Maybe that's when it was changed. Andy Dibble / Gary Crosby Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.