Cardy Posted April 5, 2005 Report Share Posted April 5, 2005 Simple questions really :Is he better than what we already have ?Does he add a new dimension to the team ?Is he better than Goodfellow ?Should Tinnion be stating already that he wants to sign him ?My answers to all these questions are no. On tonights showing hes just another average Div 1 footballer and maybe another Dinning in the making. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elko Posted April 5, 2005 Report Share Posted April 5, 2005 Simple questions really :Is he better than what we already have ?Does he add a new dimension to the team ?Is he better than Goodfellow ?Should Tinnion be stating already that he wants to sign him ?My answers to all these questions are no. On tonights showing hes just another average Div 1 footballer and maybe another Dinning in the making.←Give the guy a chance.Didn't go tonight so can't comment, but on previous showings he has looked good, just because we lost today do not get too overreactionary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pilnin Posted April 5, 2005 Report Share Posted April 5, 2005 But then when he was taken off, surely it would have been better for him to go as an attacking left back, he can actually move without needing a pie unlike bell, then having cotteril/murray on the wing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geesus the City fan Posted April 5, 2005 Report Share Posted April 5, 2005 Correct.The only difference is that Tinman has signed him whereas Goody is a Wilson man. end of. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tower crane red Posted April 5, 2005 Report Share Posted April 5, 2005 would be better off signing keith harris and orvile,but don't mention it too tinnion he just might,as his signing aint bin that good,brooker slowly going that way to Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Show Me The Money! Posted April 5, 2005 Report Share Posted April 5, 2005 I thought Tins wanted to sign him for another month. Don't think he's said he wants to sign him permanantly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Franklin CITY Posted April 5, 2005 Report Share Posted April 5, 2005 He is just another typical Tinnion signing. No doubt he shows good additude on the training ground but is actually not very good. The longer tinnion is aloud to remain in charge then we will have more of the same ie a team of tryers who are lead by management with no tactical skills bar hoofing it up to Brooker (who is also much worse than Peacock).Tinnion was a bad choice, is a bad choice and will remain so until Lansdown swallows his pride and gets rid of him.. but don't hold your breath. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swindon Hater Posted April 5, 2005 Report Share Posted April 5, 2005 I was impressed with him at Torquay, but hasn't progressed in the last two home games like I hoped. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nogbad the Bad Posted April 5, 2005 Report Share Posted April 5, 2005 Good reports of him at Torquay, there again Torquay weren't very good. In the two home games i've been disappointed, if that's a player trying to impress then he's not doing enough. Presumably he was brought in to balance the left hand side and provide the crosses we've been lacking all season. On the evidence i've seen he offers little to either cause plus he has no acceleration. He's another dull addition really. Far rather have the unpredictability and potential goal scoring of Goodfellow; if Tinman won't play him lets wait and see who's available in the Summmer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimmyb Posted April 5, 2005 Report Share Posted April 5, 2005 The two games i've seen him play he has done absolutely nothing to convince me that he is better option than either Wilks or Goodfellow.Totally ineffective tonight - although granted he got no help from Bell - looks like Wilkshire's career with us left in his car at about 6.30 and that makes us a worse team i'm afraid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lordofthebling Posted April 5, 2005 Report Share Posted April 5, 2005 Ayinsah for me next season. And a new right winger.Ship out Bell, Coles and replace the spine of the team as they leave in the summer.No doubt this will ensure mid table mediocrity next season as well.Oh joy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grandad48 Posted April 6, 2005 Report Share Posted April 6, 2005 I feel that same way and in all honesty he is nowhere near the quality of Wilks and as an earlier commnet stated Wilks is also a Wilson man and if Tinnion is going to be allowed to carry on in this vein, he will ruin the club, selling and getting rid of quality player and bringing in players worse than what we have got rid of. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobby Posted April 6, 2005 Report Share Posted April 6, 2005 Keith impressed at Torquay when played on the left in front of Golbourne but in the last 2 home games playing in front of Bell he has looked average at best. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Colby-Tit Posted April 6, 2005 Report Share Posted April 6, 2005 Wilkshire is a much better player & should have kept his place on the left Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.