Guest Smallthorne Dog Posted July 2, 2005 Report Share Posted July 2, 2005 According to a thread on OneValeFan this morning, it is reported in the daily star that we have had a £300'000 bid to buy Brooker back rejected. Do any of you lot know if there is any truth to it. Does he want away?Personally i didn't think we have that kind of cash and i wouldn't particularly want him back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TomBCFCUK Posted July 2, 2005 Report Share Posted July 2, 2005 There is a post exactly the same below! There have been a few "Rumours" about him falling out with Leroy but i couldnt see that it would mean in us selling him, as we have trouble finding "target men". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redhyde Posted July 2, 2005 Report Share Posted July 2, 2005 We look for a player to back up Brookerfail to bring in one then sell Brooker.Simply no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cider head Posted July 2, 2005 Report Share Posted July 2, 2005 Potential profit on fat ginger oaf???your having a laugh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Smallthorne Dog Posted July 2, 2005 Report Share Posted July 2, 2005 Potential profit on fat ginger oaf???your having a laugh ←Yeh, about the potential profit i am. You have to admit though he is a fat ginger oaf. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Billie Joe Posted July 2, 2005 Report Share Posted July 2, 2005 In reply to on topic. I don't want brooker back, he slated us so badly when he moved to you, stepping stone what a turd. Any Brstol fan reckon he has bigger breasts than there girlfriend? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reds Posted July 2, 2005 Report Share Posted July 2, 2005 In reply to on topic. I don't want brooker back, he slated us so badly when he moved to you, stepping stone what a turd. Any Brstol fan reckon he has bigger breasts than there girlfriend?←I'm assuming your a Green Day fan ?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xxvaliantxx Posted July 2, 2005 Report Share Posted July 2, 2005 i would love brooks back but we don't need him now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BeNeRz Posted July 2, 2005 Report Share Posted July 2, 2005 Yeh, about the potential profit i am. You have to admit though he is a fat ginger oaf.←Pffffft tbh do u even watch bristol city? Because your comments on this forum are no such like your a proper fan! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wardie Posted July 2, 2005 Report Share Posted July 2, 2005 Why would Brooker go back to Vale? And where have Vale got 300k from? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andy g Posted July 2, 2005 Report Share Posted July 2, 2005 I think you shoot down your own story when you say 'reported in the daily star'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BCAGFC Posted July 2, 2005 Report Share Posted July 2, 2005 I don't care if he is a fat ginger oaf or has large man breasts as long as he keeps on banging in the goals like last season. Port Vale fans must be absolutely gutted eh?BCAGFC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xxvaliantxx Posted July 2, 2005 Report Share Posted July 2, 2005 I don't care if he is a fat ginger oaf or has large man breasts as long as he keeps on banging in the goals like last season. Port Vale fans must be absolutely gutted eh?BCAGFC←no, not at all. we got money for him, which we needed. Now we are doing ok financially, better than most people expect. We've got 4 quality strikers now in lowndes, matthews, paynter and hector sam, so brooker isnt needed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Josef Stalin Posted July 2, 2005 Report Share Posted July 2, 2005 Steve Brooker proved to be an astute signing last season.He is more than a target man player and when Lita was out he showed us what he can do by carrying on the scoring (5 goals in 4?)I'm not bothered that some grumpy Vale fans feel like slagging him, being a Vale fan in itself must be tough, but we gave them Matthews AND Dinning, so they must really hate us!!I want to see that Tinnion continues to play him, having got Marcus in.Brooker? the man! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Smallthorne Dog Posted July 2, 2005 Report Share Posted July 2, 2005 I don't care if he is a fat ginger oaf or has large man breasts as long as he keeps on banging in the goals like last season. Port Vale fans must be absolutely gutted eh?BCAGFC←Not really our city reject Lee Matthews is doing rather well for us. 10 goals in 21 starts will do for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Smallthorne Dog Posted July 2, 2005 Report Share Posted July 2, 2005 Steve Brooker proved to be an astute signing last season.He is more than a target man player and when Lita was out he showed us what he can do by carrying on the scoring (5 goals in 4?)I'm not bothered that some grumpy Vale fans feel like slagging him, being a Vale fan in itself must be tough, but we gave them Matthews AND Dinning, so they must really hate us!!I want to see that Tinnion continues to play him, having got Marcus in.Brooker? the man! ←Yeh and Tony Dinning seems to do OK on the goals front too. 3 in 7 starts from midfield. So if you want to pay over the odds for our players and give us perfectly good players in return for nowt thats fine by me. It was plainly obvious from the pasting we gave you at our place that Tinnion doesn't have a clue what he's doing, then he goes and confirms it by buying that fat ###### Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest 2 acres red Posted July 2, 2005 Report Share Posted July 2, 2005 no, not at all. we got money for him, which we needed. Now we are doing ok financially, better than most people expect. We've got 4 quality strikers now in lowndes, matthews, paynter and hector sam, so brooker isnt needed.←[/quotesicknote quality you having a laugh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spectator Posted July 2, 2005 Report Share Posted July 2, 2005 It was a Championship side that bid the money, not the Vale. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Ron Posted July 2, 2005 Report Share Posted July 2, 2005 Yeh and Tony Dinning seems to do OK on the goals front too. 3 in 7 starts from midfield. So if you want to pay over the odds for our players and give us perfectly good players in return for nowt thats fine by me. It was plainly obvious from the pasting we gave you at our place that Tinnion doesn't have a clue what he's doing, then he goes and confirms it by buying that fat ######←You're top scorer has what, 10 goals to his name last season?Brooks had over 20, and wasn't even the top goalscorer.That says alot about the "quality" of your sheep players. Good luck Tony Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest MaloneFM Posted July 2, 2005 Report Share Posted July 2, 2005 Potential profit on fat ginger oaf???your having a laugh ←Yeah Dyce was rubbish... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.