shire_redz Posted September 20, 2005 Report Share Posted September 20, 2005 ...before City fans turn their anger towards Mr Landsdown? He now appears to be the only one to blame. And we all need someone to blame, don't we? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarcusX Posted September 20, 2005 Report Share Posted September 20, 2005 No, we don't. Whether theres a manager or not its the players out there on the pitch who control the game.Was it Keith Millen who switched off after 85 minutes on saturday? No. It was the players.Is it Keith Millen/Tinnion that hasnt been able to defend this season? No its the players.The only problem i have with the manager was the choice to bring in and select players who are simply not good enough for our club. Like Clayton Fortune and IMO Craig Fortune.Bring back Matty, Danny and Tony!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shire_redz Posted September 20, 2005 Author Report Share Posted September 20, 2005 But surely he must harbour some of the responsibility for this shambles? Bring back Leslie Kew!!!!!!!!!(joke) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Northern Red Posted September 20, 2005 Report Share Posted September 20, 2005 No, we don't. Whether theres a manager or not its the players out there on the pitch who control the game.Was it Keith Millen who switched off after 85 minutes on saturday? No. It was the players.Is it Keith Millen/Tinnion that hasnt been able to defend this season? No its the players.The only problem i have with the manager was the choice to bring in and select players who are simply not good enough for our club. Like Clayton Fortune and IMO Craig Fortune.Bring back Matty, Danny and Tony!!!←Craig Fortune??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest routabout Posted September 20, 2005 Report Share Posted September 20, 2005 Craig Fortune???←Clayton Woodman? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarcusX Posted September 20, 2005 Report Share Posted September 20, 2005 Its not the fact we sold lita that annoys me, because he was always going to want to leave. Its the fact that the money didnt bring in a really good player. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest routabout Posted September 20, 2005 Report Share Posted September 20, 2005 But we really do need a proper left back, don't we? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarcusX Posted September 20, 2005 Report Share Posted September 20, 2005 HaHa, I'm sooo annyed with fortune that i put his name twice, i meant woodman and fortune. They are both shockingly poor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robins72 Posted September 20, 2005 Report Share Posted September 20, 2005 But we really do need a proper left back, don't we?←Yes shall I have a go??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Northern Red Posted September 20, 2005 Report Share Posted September 20, 2005 There is nothing wrong with Goldbourne. He has made a few mistakes but how many did matt Hill make when he 1st broke into the team? Us fans could all see the raw potential in him and we supported him and he later came good after learning not to Give peneltys away by touching the ball up with his hand.←Indeed. I remember the first 18 months or so of Hill's career, where everytime the ball went into our penalty area, the shouts from behind me in the Dolman would be "For ######s sake Hill, get your ######g hands down!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin Maesknoll Red Posted September 20, 2005 Admin Report Share Posted September 20, 2005 then later goes and lets tins bring in his own team and rip apart a promotion team.←Did I miss a promotion then? Or are you refering to the nearly, but not quite good enough team? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shire_redz Posted September 20, 2005 Author Report Share Posted September 20, 2005 Funny how posts really go off topic! Twas just wonderin' if maybe SL was just a lickle bit responsible for our current situation? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest C.T.I.D Posted September 20, 2005 Report Share Posted September 20, 2005 ...before City fans turn their anger towards Mr Landsdown? He now appears to be the only one to blame. And we all need someone to blame, don't we?←i have to say he has a lot to answer for.he might've provided stability but tight as **** with the purse strings.cheap manager(not bad first year i'll admit),sell top players,get in the freebies and now it is going to bite him on the ar$e,spend spend spent to get the best players to get out of this league.if he's moaning how much this club is losing stuck in this league just think how much we'll lose in the bargain basement playing chester et all i have already consigned myself to B.C.F.C being relegated so anything else will be a bonus Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin Maesknoll Red Posted September 20, 2005 Admin Report Share Posted September 20, 2005 Funny how posts really go off topic! Twas just wonderin' if maybe SL was just a lickle bit responsible for our current situation?←Obviously, as the Chairman of the Board who appointed Tinnion, he must shoulder the blame, but he now has a chance to redeem the situation, although I don't envy him the task of finding the right man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shire_redz Posted September 20, 2005 Author Report Share Posted September 20, 2005 It isn't just about finding the right man. It's also about strengthening a squad which, to be quite honest is very weak in all departments. Also, if the chap has any sort of ambition at all for this club - he needs to really put his hand in his pocket. He won't get this club anywhere on the cheap! What is needed is a new manager and quite a few new players. It is quite laughable we were tipped for promotion with a no-nothing manager and a team that lacked a naturally left-sided midfielder. The side is also woefully lacking in pace throughout all areas. I wish I knew the answer to this huge problem but I don't. The only possible answer I can see is a Martin Allen type and route-one football. However much we'd hate to see this, it may be the best short term solution. Here's to a better answer, Shire_redz. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin Maesknoll Red Posted September 20, 2005 Admin Report Share Posted September 20, 2005 It isn't just about finding the right man. It's also about strengthening a squad which, to be quite honest is very weak in all departments. Also, if the chap has any sort of ambition at all for this club - he needs to really put his hand in his pocket. He won't get this club anywhere on the cheap! What is needed is a new manager and quite a few new players. It is quite laughable we were tipped for promotion with a no-nothing manager and a team that lacked a naturally left-sided midfielder. The side is also woefully lacking in pace throughout all areas. I wish I knew the answer to this huge problem but I don't. The only possible answer I can see is a Martin Allen type and route-one football. However much we'd hate to see this, it may be the best short term solution. Here's to a better answer, Shire_redz.←I've a feeling that a team of big hoofers maybe whats required to get out of this division. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.