Guest I bleed red 'n' white Posted October 2, 2005 Report Share Posted October 2, 2005 i think its rather harsh not to start with bridges because when the ball is on the floor he has the ability to be the best player here, when we bring him on we're either not bothering to attack or the ball isn't on the floor and we're desperately hoofing the ball up in the airif he starts against tranmere with the passind display we now have, he could be the creator his ball to madjo in the last few minutes was superb and if the ball is on the floor he could be brilliant Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scarz3 Posted October 2, 2005 Report Share Posted October 2, 2005 Yeh , I think Bridges should play in the 'hole' just behind the 2 strikers , he plays well there Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dolman_bcfc Posted October 2, 2005 Report Share Posted October 2, 2005 Yeh , I think Bridges should play in the 'hole' just behind the 2 strikers , he plays well there Yeah i agree but which player would you drop to allow this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex_BCFC Posted October 2, 2005 Report Share Posted October 2, 2005 Yeah i agree but which player would you drop to allow this?I don't think so. He still doesn't look fit enough to play 90 minutes. We played well without him yesterday and would have normally won the game comfortably. His shooting is quite embarassing lately too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fRed Posted October 2, 2005 Report Share Posted October 2, 2005 Yes Alex, I hope to see the same 11 next Saturday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Ron Posted October 2, 2005 Report Share Posted October 2, 2005 See them where? At the Pub?Bridges was nothing short of AWFUL yesterday, 3 shots which Scott Brown would have buried, he mucked them all up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest I bleed red 'n' white Posted October 2, 2005 Report Share Posted October 2, 2005 See them where? At the Pub?Bridges was nothing short of AWFUL yesterday, 3 shots which Scott Brown would have buried, he mucked them all up.yet marcus stewart misses even more clear chances and he remains untouched when it comes to moans Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dolman_bcfc Posted October 2, 2005 Report Share Posted October 2, 2005 yet marcus stewart misses even more clear chances and he remains untouched when it comes to moansSorry if I'm wrong but i can not remember any clear chances Stewart had yesterday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex_BCFC Posted October 2, 2005 Report Share Posted October 2, 2005 Sorry if I'm wrong but i can not remember any clear chances Stewart had yesterday.He had one which he put over the bar on the turn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dolman_bcfc Posted October 2, 2005 Report Share Posted October 2, 2005 He had one which he put over the bar on the turn.That isn't a clear chance. He had his back to goal and made that chance himself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest I bleed red 'n' white Posted October 2, 2005 Report Share Posted October 2, 2005 Sorry if I'm wrong but i can not remember any clear chances Stewart had yesterday.header in first minute, shot over the bar(it was his fault cos regardless of what others say it was a good ball), and he had another 2/3 shots were he cshould have done much betterThat isn't a clear chance. He had his back to goal and made that chance himself.no he didn't he had loads of space and his first touch was (as usual) poor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex_BCFC Posted October 2, 2005 Report Share Posted October 2, 2005 That isn't a clear chance. He had his back to goal and made that chance himself.He did have time and the ball from Brooker was inch perfect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dolman_bcfc Posted October 2, 2005 Report Share Posted October 2, 2005 header in first minute, shot over the bar(it was his fault cos regardless of what others say it was a good ball), and he had another 2/3 shots were he cshould have done much betterno he didn't he had loads of space and his first touch was (as usual) pooroh yeah sorry i forgot that first minute header. Yeah i think he should of scored it but if it wasn't his first touch of the match he probably would of Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest I bleed red 'n' white Posted October 2, 2005 Report Share Posted October 2, 2005 oh yeah sorry i forgot that first minute header. Yeah i think he should of scored it but if it wasn't his first touch of the match he probably would ofthat is exactly whats wrong we don't give him criticism like all the others, we make excuseslets face it he is nowhere near as good as everyone anticipated Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dolman_bcfc Posted October 2, 2005 Report Share Posted October 2, 2005 that is exactly whats wrong we don't give him criticism like all the others, we make excuseslets face it he is nowhere near as good as everyone anticipatedThats a typical City fans comment. So you want everyone to slate him and boo him off the pitch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest I bleed red 'n' white Posted October 2, 2005 Report Share Posted October 2, 2005 Thats a typical City fans comment. So you want everyone to slate him and boo him off the pitch.did i say to boo him off the pitch NObut if we groan at everyone else but not at him he will think he's untouchable and will get (even more) complacent Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex_BCFC Posted October 2, 2005 Report Share Posted October 2, 2005 that is exactly whats wrong we don't give him criticism like all the others, we make excuseslets face it he is nowhere near as good as everyone anticipatedI don't think he has had the impact most expected but 3 goals in 3 games is better. He doesn't like being substitued on 60 mins every game, clearly a tactic Johnson likes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Ron Posted October 2, 2005 Report Share Posted October 2, 2005 that is exactly whats wrong we don't give him criticism like all the others, we make excuseslets face it he is nowhere near as good as everyone anticipatedHow you can defend Michael Bridges and critisise Marcus is beyond me You don't give him critisism like the others, you make excuses. Marcus had a poor game but he has scored 3 in 3. Bridges hasn't been particularly great all season. He can pass (but that's all) - so why don't we play him CM like Wilkshire? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DolmanDudess Posted October 2, 2005 Report Share Posted October 2, 2005 Id quite like to see Bridges given a fair run out aswell. Hes hardly been given a chance to critisise him. Id drop Stewart to the bench if anything. To allow him to play in the hole behind the front two would mean we would have to drop someone else and i cant see anyone who warrants being subbed apart from maybe Davey C Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.