Jump to content
IGNORED

Brooker Cover?


leadman

Recommended Posts

It's the signing, or should I say, the type of player, we should have signed instead of Bridges in the close season.

It's a boost before tomorrows game, that's for sure.

He's cover for Brooker, although I don't really see him playing next to Brooker, unless we change our style and go a bit more direct.

We could put Stewart, Madjo, Gillespie or Bridges next to him.

Now, sign two wide players and get some crosses in the box and we'll be laughing :city::city:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...