Guest Homer Posted November 30, 2005 Report Share Posted November 30, 2005 Does anyone else think that we should never have sold him? I bet all those people who gave him a good slating on here before he left are now looking back and thinking "what if we had not made him our scapegoat, that we all decided we were going to have a good winge about, we might not be doing so bad now". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrotherErnieFromBarrowGurney Posted November 30, 2005 Report Share Posted November 30, 2005 Selling him was not a problem, not replacing him was the crime. :@ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrotherErnieFromBarrowGurney Posted November 30, 2005 Report Share Posted November 30, 2005 Selling him was not a problem, not replacing him was the crime. :@ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Harry Dolman Posted November 30, 2005 Report Share Posted November 30, 2005 Selling him was not a problem, not replacing him was the crime. :@Spot on & you can put Mickey Bell & Leroy in that boat to. All sold for valid reasons, but none replaced. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nibor Posted November 30, 2005 Report Share Posted November 30, 2005 Does anyone else think that we should never have sold him? I bet all those people who gave him a good slating on here before he left are now looking back and thinking "what if we had not made him our scapegoat, that we all decided we were going to have a good winge about, we might not be doing so bad now". Yeah we should have kept him.Then we'd have had the benefit of 15 league appearances out of him. One of those he was sent off in, one of those was a sub appearance and no less than 7 of them he failed to complete 90 minutes in, once being taken off before half time.We miss him lots. I bet Holloway is loving the return on investment he gets for his £150k and £7k a week.Nibor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bristol Boy Posted November 30, 2005 Report Share Posted November 30, 2005 No, I'm thinking that with all the stuff on here about stopping the big time charlie, drinking culture at AG that it's laughable you even suggest it. There were 2 Tommys-the one that arrived as an unassuming youngster who had everything and a big future then suffered two career threatening injuries and the one of recent years who was a pale shadow of that player.Indisciplined and unprofessional, even to the point of not trying until ten games of the season were left and his contract was up.Also, given that returning players have hardly covered themselves with glory, I don't want another one.......unless it's Lita or Andy Cole perhaps!!Selling him was not a problem, not replacing him was the crime. :@Amen & Spot ON.Players leave, that's football.It's who's here that counts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Denhilson Posted November 30, 2005 Report Share Posted November 30, 2005 Yeah we should have kept him.Then we'd have had the benefit of 15 league appearances out of him. One of those he was sent off in, one of those was a sub appearance and no less than 7 of them he failed to complete 90 minutes in, once being taken off before half time.We miss him lots. I bet Holloway is loving the return on investment he gets for his £150k and £7k a week.Niborwhat the ###### are you on about? it wasnt 150k, it was around 85k actually. and no he's not on 7k a week if you read my post on another thread about Tom and stop listening to so called 'supporters' you'd get a clue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cider head Posted November 30, 2005 Report Share Posted November 30, 2005 Selling him was not a problem, not replacing him was the crime. :@that i agree with we have never replaced what he gave in our midfieldjust a shame he was his own worst enemy off the pitch, having said thatthe way we are at the moment i'd take a half fit tommy doc back Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andy234 Posted November 30, 2005 Report Share Posted November 30, 2005 Hate to say it but even Dinning would look good in our side at the moment Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bucksred Posted November 30, 2005 Report Share Posted November 30, 2005 Hate to say it but even Dinning would look good in our side at the moment No waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest revkev Posted November 30, 2005 Report Share Posted November 30, 2005 Hate to say it but even Dinning would look good in our side at the moment When Bristol City signed him my friends here in Wigan practically wet themselves laughing, then proceeded to arrange street parties to celebrate his departure. It was at this point that I began to suspect that all was not well......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kiwicolin Posted November 30, 2005 Report Share Posted November 30, 2005 No we don't need him back, but someone with his footballing talents and a better attitude.Would be good if they couldlast a whole 90 minutes on the pitch too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.