Guest alex1089 Posted January 8, 2006 Report Share Posted January 8, 2006 confirmed by SteveL also says its an Ongoing sell on clause.http://www.otib.co.uk/index.php?showtopic=50532 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
samo Posted January 8, 2006 Report Share Posted January 8, 2006 by saying its "ongoing" is he agreeing to gaz's point that we'd get something if he gets transfered and then transfered again? hope that is the case for liam and leroy both! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex1089 Posted January 8, 2006 Report Share Posted January 8, 2006 Yeah thats what I think he is talking about. I expect he is sitting in his appartment in Algarve with Gary looking at these messages right now! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ashtonyate Posted January 8, 2006 Report Share Posted January 8, 2006 I would have though that a fee would only be payable by Fulham if he was transferd but what happend if he does not sign a new contract with Fulham and goes on a bosman I don't think we would get a fee then??.What do you think Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bh_red Posted January 9, 2006 Report Share Posted January 9, 2006 if he went on a bosman then obviously we would get nothing, because there is nothing to get?0% of Zero = 0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Watts Posted January 9, 2006 Report Share Posted January 9, 2006 I think it works as such as we receive a percentage of any profit Fulham (in LR's case) make from the player... i.e if they receive money from any future sell on clauses, it increases their profit on him and therefore the percentage we're entitiled to.Does that make sense....? I know what I'm trying to say anyway! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NailseaRed Posted January 9, 2006 Report Share Posted January 9, 2006 if he went on a bosman then obviously we would get nothing, because there is nothing to get?0% of Zero = 0surely if we get a percentage of the sell on fee your maths should indeed be a percentage higher than 0 multipled by zero Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wurzel920 Posted January 9, 2006 Report Share Posted January 9, 2006 surely if we get a percentage of the sell on fee your maths should indeed be a percentage higher than 0 multipled by zero But 10% 20% or even 50% of zero is still nothing so it does not matter what percentage it was muliplyied by we would still receive nothing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bh red Posted January 9, 2006 Report Share Posted January 9, 2006 surely if we get a percentage of the sell on fee your maths should indeed be a percentage higher than 0 multipled by zero come on you know what I mean!! it was 1am...........damn big brother making me stay up late! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bcfc seattle Posted January 9, 2006 Report Share Posted January 9, 2006 Weren't we going to get money for the U-21 caps as well? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NailseaRed Posted January 9, 2006 Report Share Posted January 9, 2006 But 10% 20% or even 50% of zero is still nothing so it does not matter what percentage it was muliplyied by we would still receive nothingoh really? i didn't know anything multipled by zero was zero! thanks for pointing that out to me, i'll try not to make the same mistake again! damn maths degree was useless! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redsalesman Posted January 9, 2006 Report Share Posted January 9, 2006 As i understand its much like the Adi Akinbiy (sp) transfer, We sold to Wolves and paid the Gills a precentage, When Wolves sold to Leicester we recived a percentage of the fee/profit, We then had to give Gills a percentage of our 2nd profit.Red Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.