BigTone Posted February 3, 2006 Posted February 3, 2006 Reported in Evil Post that GJ said he was "delighted" at failing to sign Michael Reddy. Why put in a bid in the first place then??
Admin Maesknoll Posted February 3, 2006 Admin Posted February 3, 2006 I think you have taken a snippet of the article and quoted out of context.Article
BigTone Posted February 3, 2006 Author Posted February 3, 2006 I think you have taken a snippet of the article and quoted out of context.Article Not at all.Thats not the article I was reading on their website at 6am this morning. It was headlined something along the lines of "Johnson delighted at missing targets"However, I have just checked their webpage again and it seems the original article has been removed/replaced.Thanlks Evil Post for making me look a complete plank !!
BigTone Posted February 3, 2006 Author Posted February 3, 2006 oh dear, bad start to the day! I'm going back home to bed.Ah stuff it, I'll make someones life hell in here first !Aren't Fridays the best
Admin Maesknoll Posted February 3, 2006 Admin Posted February 3, 2006 Not at all.Thats not the article I was reading on their website at 6am this morning. The word "delighted" was definately used.However, I have just checked their webpage again and it seems the original article has been removed/replaced.Thanlks Evil Post for making me look a complete plank !! The word delighted is there still:Johnson added with a grin: "In some ways I'm delighted that Michael Reddy isn't joining us because it means I'll have ample opportunity to see what Calvin is about.But it's obviously a bit tongue in cheek, as the initial few paragraphs talk of his frustration at failing to sign Reddy.
BigTone Posted February 3, 2006 Author Posted February 3, 2006 The word delighted is there still:Johnson added with a grin: "In some ways I'm delighted that Michael Reddy isn't joining us because it means I'll have ample opportunity to see what Calvin is about.But it's obviously a bit tongue in cheek, as the initial few paragraphs talk of his frustration at failing to sign Reddy.Still isn't the same article as earlier
Admin Maesknoll Posted February 3, 2006 Admin Posted February 3, 2006 Still isn't the same article as earlier Are you sure? I've got last nights Evil Post in my hand now and the story is word for word the same as the back page of the *** edition.
BigTone Posted February 3, 2006 Author Posted February 3, 2006 Are you sure? I've got last nights Evil Post in my hand now and the story is word for word the same as the back page of the *** edition.Absolutely positive.Seen it before on their webpage though where an article is either replaced or removed.As I live in Dublin I cannot get a hard copy so reply on the web.I'm definately going home now, my printer just cacked its pants
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.