reddoh Posted August 29, 2006 Report Share Posted August 29, 2006 The ref was not looking at the players when the offence occurred how did he make the decision why don't you allwrite in and ask ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grifty Posted August 29, 2006 Report Share Posted August 29, 2006 yeah i noticed that on the replaymaybe he ...heard it?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robins72 Posted August 29, 2006 Report Share Posted August 29, 2006 Both were guilty Orr for moving his head forward and Carey for raising his hands. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reddoh Posted August 29, 2006 Author Report Share Posted August 29, 2006 Both were guilty Orr for moving his head forward and Carey for raising his hands.yes i totally agree but the ref was not looking at them when it occurred he could not see it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevedon Red Posted August 29, 2006 Report Share Posted August 29, 2006 Thats what linesmen are for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LSR Posted August 29, 2006 Report Share Posted August 29, 2006 hum 4th official..arnt the radio linked? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twaters Posted August 30, 2006 Report Share Posted August 30, 2006 Well more to the point because the replays show clearly he didnt, how did he know to send Orr off? Can anyone throw any light onto this? I didnt see him talk to the linesman so he must have made the choice to send him off on ... what?Anyone elses thoughts perhaps could clear it up for me? Or anyone else confused. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twaters Posted August 30, 2006 Report Share Posted August 30, 2006 hum 4th official..arnt the radio linked?I very much doubt the fourth official could see it if1. Gary Johnson couldnt see it (i know he is short but not that short)2. There was a crowd of players and from such a distance i doubt he could see it clearly.Also the Ref didnt talk to his linesman did he? I don't remember seeing it on the tv pictures, so i ask again, how did he know to send Orr off? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tinman-is-god Posted August 30, 2006 Report Share Posted August 30, 2006 We cannot complain about the sending off, i truely believe we were lucky to have 10 on the field. Carey should have gone too, and then we really would have been buggered. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wackojacko14 Posted August 30, 2006 Report Share Posted August 30, 2006 Carey was bleeding just under in-between his eyebrows, ref's now-a-days only need that to send someone off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tinman-is-god Posted August 30, 2006 Report Share Posted August 30, 2006 Carey was bleeding just under in-between his eyebrows, ref's now-a-days only need that to send someone off. Are you trying to claim that Orr didn't deserve to be sent off? That was a red card offence, no question. Carey should have gone too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twaters Posted August 30, 2006 Report Share Posted August 30, 2006 What i don't get is how can you headbutt someone and the police do nothing about it, but if i went down the street and did i would be arrested straight away. Its not as if they don't have evidence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.