alanpayne Posted September 2, 2006 Report Share Posted September 2, 2006 This is according to the Evening Post. Any one know or understand why? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cardy Posted September 2, 2006 Report Share Posted September 2, 2006 This is according to the Evening Post. Any one know or understand why?Maybe he wanted to use the same legal team that got him off with a caution last time. Or maybe the BCFC team couldn't cope with having 4 players all being prosecuted at the same time ...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ralph Milne Posted September 2, 2006 Report Share Posted September 2, 2006 Maybe he wanted to use the same legal team that got him off with a caution last time. Or maybe the BCFC team couldn't cope with having 4 players all being prosecuted at the same time ......I would of gone for "Toadfish" in neighbours he seems to be good in getting people off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cardy Posted September 2, 2006 Report Share Posted September 2, 2006 I would of gone for "Toadfish" in neighbours he seems to be good in getting people off.Yeah and he was fully qualified by the age of about 17 so he must be good ..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BB in Backwell Posted September 2, 2006 Report Share Posted September 2, 2006 This is according to the Evening Post. Any one know or understand why?Maybe because he headbutted someone on TV, how can you defend that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.