greenun Posted March 5, 2004 Report Share Posted March 5, 2004 Sorry to anyone over the age of 30 for The Jam puns.... In our 11 match winning run... Goals for: 21 Goals against: 5 City Scorers Peacock: 5 Lita: 4 Goodfellow: 3 A Brown: 2 Doherty: 2 Miller: 2 Carey: 1 Hill: 1 Tinnion: 1 Peacock and Miller were the first choice strike pairing in EVERY game, producing only 7 goals. Not once in the run did they BOTH score in the same game. Amazingly, thats only happened ONCE in the League this season. They both scored against Notts County, in the 5-0 win on the opening day of the campaign. Staggeringly, thats the only time when both starting strikers have scored in the SAME match. Finally, during the winning streak, the best defensive quartet was: Carey, Coles, Hill and Woodman, who conceded a paltry 2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
One Team Posted March 5, 2004 Report Share Posted March 5, 2004 Pretty much says what we already know but nicely presented! Thats the best back four on paper and in reality; and we all know Peacock needs the bench and the strikers aren't scoring enough goals. One Team Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bucksred Posted March 5, 2004 Report Share Posted March 5, 2004 Carey, Coles, Hill and Woodman, who conceded a paltry 2. Christ didnt realise they were that tight!! It does highlight the striker problems though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Will Rollason Posted March 5, 2004 Report Share Posted March 5, 2004 time for a change.Supported Leapy all way,and not either front mans fault entirely,but it needs a change. going to be....-roberts/miller c'mon city.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
graham b Posted March 5, 2004 Report Share Posted March 5, 2004 In our 11 match winning run... Goals for: 21 Goals against: 5 City Scorers Peacock: 5 Lita: 4 Goodfellow: 3 A Brown: 2 Doherty: 2 Miller: 2 Carey: 1 Hill: 1 Tinnion: 1 Finally, during the winning streak, the best defensive quartet was: Carey, Coles, Hill and Woodman, who conceded a paltry 2. Green Un, I think you will find that Peacock only scored 4, Wilkshire got the last! Also the Carey, Butler, Coles, Hill combination conceded 3 from 7 starts(0.42 per game) whereas Coles, Carey, Hill, Woodman conceded 2 from 4 (0.5 per game) Substitutions cloud the issue somewhat but the only real conclusion is that we were defensively sound. Just wouldn't want you working with poor information would we! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greenun Posted March 5, 2004 Author Report Share Posted March 5, 2004 Green Un, I think you will find that Peacock only scored 4, Wilkshire got the last! Also the Carey, Butler, Coles, Hill combination conceded 3 from 7 starts(0.42 per game) whereas Coles, Carey, Hill, Woodman conceded 2 from 4 (0.5 per game) Substitutions cloud the issue somewhat but the only real conclusion is that we were defensively sound. Just wouldn't want you working with poor information would we! Excellent points GB! How I failed to spot Wilkshire's winner against Wrexham, when I took all the info from the Green 'Un, means my eyes obviously need testing. Mind you, it only makes the Peacock/Miller "partnership" appear even more alarming....if thats possible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.