cityfan Posted December 31, 2006 Report Share Posted December 31, 2006 City totally changed the game when they reverted to 3-4-3 on Saturday. With two wide men as well it also offers 3-2-5 with Murray and Mire-Williams going forward. I doubt, given city's form over the last 22 gamaes, many teams in this division will cope with this formation and those in it. Jevons nearly scored within 2 minutes and this formations creates and delivers constant pressure on the opposition. Once we reverted back to 4-4-2 after the second goal, it changed the complexion of the game again and once again we came under, what I though, was unnecessary pressure.We need to improve our goal difference.We need to improve our presence and control of the gameWho thinks 3-4-3 is a better way to start with changes to be made once a solid lead is established? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donovan Posted December 31, 2006 Report Share Posted December 31, 2006 I Don't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cityfan Posted January 1, 2007 Author Report Share Posted January 1, 2007 Well I do STILL after today's result and Managers game comments Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.