Port Said Red Posted September 1, 2007 Report Share Posted September 1, 2007 I hate to criticise GJ or Millen in our current situation but, why did they go ahead and make the Trundle substitution with Enoch lying on the deck in agony? It would have made more sense to wait to see what state he was in and as it turned out, it looked like he did himself some real damage by playing on.It meant we ended playing 4-5-1 with Murray up front which in the end didn't cause us any large problems, but wasn't ideal.A little patience may have been in order there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigTone Posted September 1, 2007 Report Share Posted September 1, 2007 I hate to criticise GJ or Millen in our current situation but, why did they go ahead and make the Trundle substitution with Enoch lying on the deck in agony? It would have made more sense to wait to see what state he was in and as it turned out, it looked like he did himself some real damage by playing on.It meant we ended playing 4-5-1 with Murray up front which in the end didn't cause us any large problems, but wasn't ideal.A little patience may have been in order there.I was puzzled by it also. We ended up being very lightweight up front. Only thing is that we won and thats all that matters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beau45 Posted September 1, 2007 Report Share Posted September 1, 2007 I hate to criticise GJ or Millen in our current situation but, why did they go ahead and make the Trundle substitution with Enoch lying on the deck in agony? It would have made more sense to wait to see what state he was in and as it turned out, it looked like he did himself some real damage by playing on.It meant we ended playing 4-5-1 with Murray up front which in the end didn't cause us any large problems, but wasn't ideal.A little patience may have been in order there.I said exactly the same thing as it was happening, didnt make sense! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaffer Posted September 1, 2007 Report Share Posted September 1, 2007 Yeah it was a ludicrous substitution, however the way i feel about Gary Johnson at the minute, he could bring back Tony Dinning and play him centre back and i'd still think he's a genius! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Port Said Red Posted September 1, 2007 Author Report Share Posted September 1, 2007 Yeah it was a ludicrous substitution, however the way i feel about Gary Johnson at the minute, he could bring back Tony Dinning and play him centre back and i'd still think he's a genius!If he got a performance out of him, he would be! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
East End Lad Posted September 1, 2007 Report Share Posted September 1, 2007 Must admit I thought when watching it that it was a bit silly, but I suppose Gary got it right (again) and we got the three points. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bucksred Posted September 1, 2007 Report Share Posted September 1, 2007 I hate to criticise GJ or Millen in our current situation but, why did they go ahead and make the Trundle substitution with Enoch lying on the deck in agony? It would have made more sense to wait to see what state he was in and as it turned out, it looked like he did himself some real damage by playing on.It meant we ended playing 4-5-1 with Murray up front which in the end didn't cause us any large problems, but wasn't ideal.A little patience may have been in order there.First GJ decision I have had serious issues with. we didnt suffer anything as a result, but not goodIf he got a performance out of him, he would be!No chance whatsoever of that happening. dinning is the least interested player City have ever had the misfortune to sign. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LSR Posted September 1, 2007 Report Share Posted September 1, 2007 made me laught when spourle came off ,i mean wtf he was awesome Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bartolona Posted September 1, 2007 Report Share Posted September 1, 2007 On world GJ said they thought Elliott was the one down, not Enoch otherwise he would of not took LT off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andy g Posted September 1, 2007 Report Share Posted September 1, 2007 I think the reason they really wanted to keep Enoch on the pitch was because they wanted someone to mark Sodje.Sodjes height was likely to cause us problems and every time there was a set piece ES was there to watch him.Not sure why they took Trundle off at that point though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.