Bristol Boy Posted September 25, 2007 Report Share Posted September 25, 2007 Lots of talk about him on here and in the media and it was said Coventry got him on the cheap.Tribunal set a fee of £650k plus a 20% sell on within his current contract which runs until 2010.Soton had pinched him from Notts County as a kid and they get a fee as well.There is also additional money to pay if Coventry get promoted etc.Anybody think we should have signed him for that fee? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nibor Posted September 25, 2007 Report Share Posted September 25, 2007 Considering what other strikers have gone for I think that's a steal, and if he scores 15 goals in one season they've effectively tripled their money. I'd have been very happy to see a strikeforce of Trundle, Best, Byfield and Brooker this season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the prefect Posted September 25, 2007 Report Share Posted September 25, 2007 Lots of talk about him on here and in the media and it was said Coventry got him on the cheap.Tribunal set a fee of £650k plus a 20% sell on within his current contract which runs until 2010.Soton had pinched him from Notts County as a kid and they get a fee as well.There is also additional money to pay if Coventry get promoted etc.Anybody think we should have signed him for that fee?No. No first touch, can't hold up the ball and can't shoot. Appart from that he's fine!The Prefect - Cov City fan in exile Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.