loudred4ever Posted February 6, 2008 Report Share Posted February 6, 2008 does anyone know if enoch is allowed to play in saturdays game? i can see it now 90mins enoch scores the winner!!(hope not though!!!) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SyntaxtheRed Posted February 6, 2008 Report Share Posted February 6, 2008 he's not allowed to play. in was in the terms described on the OS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barman Posted February 6, 2008 Report Share Posted February 6, 2008 No, it was part of the terms of the loan that he isn't elligable for the game against us. He'll be sitting in the stands, twiddling his thumbs and planning how he's going to spend his fat signing on fee in the summer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bh_red Posted February 6, 2008 Report Share Posted February 6, 2008 Thankfully not, Johnson isn't as daft as John Ward! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Red Rich Posted February 6, 2008 Report Share Posted February 6, 2008 Thankfully not, Johnson isn't as daft as John Ward!What was the situation with John Ward? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redcityman Posted February 6, 2008 Report Share Posted February 6, 2008 What was the situation with John Ward?I ,ay be wrong but didn't he loan David Seal to Northampton town and allowed him to play, result being Seal scored twice and we lost Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chappers Posted February 8, 2008 Report Share Posted February 8, 2008 It was only one goal, but it was a cracker. He did explain it once, something to do with Northampton being unsure about signing him, Northampton had no other games during the loan period, and he needed a good performance to clinch the deal. No, I did not understand it either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fRed Posted February 8, 2008 Report Share Posted February 8, 2008 The dice are cast. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Red Rich Posted February 8, 2008 Report Share Posted February 8, 2008 It was only one goal, but it was a cracker. He did explain it once, something to do with Northampton being unsure about signing him, Northampton had no other games during the loan period, and he needed a good performance to clinch the deal. No, I did not understand it either.Ah yes, that does ring a bell. I also remember Carl Hutchings only ever playing well at the Gate when he was playing against us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hicksy-BCFC Posted February 8, 2008 Report Share Posted February 8, 2008 No, it was part of the terms of the loan that he isn't elligable for the game against us. He'll be sitting in the stands, twiddling his thumbs and planning how he's going to spend his fat signing on fee in the summer.I don't begrudge Enoch a signing on fee in the summer and doing well.He did what we asked of him and I think we all move on.Rather him than some of the mercenaries around like Anelka and Collymore.Obviously I wouldn't rather have Enoch in a football sense than those two.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.