Riaz Posted April 11, 2004 Report Share Posted April 11, 2004 I didnt go to the game (cos of my flipping uncle) So, how well did each of the players do? (out of 10) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrahamC Posted April 11, 2004 Report Share Posted April 11, 2004 Phillips 7 Carey 7 Butler 8 Coles 8 Hill 7 Murray 6 Doherty 7 Tinnion 6 Bell 6 Roberts 7 Peacock 6 Sub used Miller 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
westoncider Posted April 11, 2004 Report Share Posted April 11, 2004 IT SHOULD OF BEEN ... PHILLIPS 6 COLES 9 BUTLER 5 HILL 8 CAREY 7 MURRAY 7 DOHERTY 7 TINMAN 6 BELL 5 ROBERTS 7 PEACOCK GODS KNOWS -3 SUBS USED MILLER 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest RedwardsV1 Posted April 11, 2004 Report Share Posted April 11, 2004 It should have been the ratings without Peacocks name but with Litas or Rougier Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reds Posted April 11, 2004 Report Share Posted April 11, 2004 Peacock was good I thought, although its time for a Miller/Roberts combo against Plymouth Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest black golf Posted April 11, 2004 Report Share Posted April 11, 2004 no way will miller and roberts start togeter peacock will not be dropped by wilson god knows why Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobby Posted April 11, 2004 Report Share Posted April 11, 2004 IT SHOULD OF BEEN ... PHILLIPS 6 COLES 9 BUTLER 5 HILL 8 CAREY 7 MURRAY 7 DOHERTY 7 TINMAN 6 BELL 5 ROBERTS 7 PEACOCK GODS KNOWS -3 SUBS USED MILLER 7 Not sure what game you were watching westoncider, but my ratings are as follows PHILLIPS 7 COLES 8 BUTLER 7 HILL 8 CAREY 7 MURRAY 7 DOHERTY 8 TINMAN 6 BELL 7 ROBERTS 8 PEACOCK 8 SUBS USED MILLER 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrahamC Posted April 11, 2004 Report Share Posted April 11, 2004 I suppose another reason he might not be dropped is that he put a chance on a plate for each of his strike partners on Saturday, and it's hardly his fault that one of them was missed. Having said that I was surprised Rougier didn't come on to replace Christian instead as his pace would have been more of a straight swap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swindon Hater Posted April 11, 2004 Report Share Posted April 11, 2004 Mine.. PHILLIPS 8 COLES 7 BUTLER 8 HILL 6 CAREY 7 MURRAY 5 DOHERTY 7 TINMAN 7 BELL 9 ROBERTS 9 PEACOCK 8 SUBS USED MILLER 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gazza1982 Posted April 11, 2004 Report Share Posted April 11, 2004 I dont understand how you can be so harsh on Peacock? he set up one and if Miller had scored that! then he would have had two assists! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest wes04 Posted April 11, 2004 Report Share Posted April 11, 2004 Phillips- 7 Carey- 6 Hill- 6 Butler- 7 Coles-7 Bell- 8 Murray- 5 Tinnion -6 Doherty- 7 Peacock- 2 Roberts- 6 miller- 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest DANBOY_BCFC Posted April 11, 2004 Report Share Posted April 11, 2004 Phillips- 7 Carey- 6 Hill- 6 Butler- 7 Coles-7 Bell- 8 Murray- 5 Tinnion -6 Doherty- 7 Peacock- 2 Roberts- 6 miller- 6 You really are a c*ck. Next time you go to a game open your ######g eyes. Peacock was a 7 at least, tried as hard as anyone on the field, set up Robbo's goal and Lee M's chance therefore effectively contibuting more than anyone on the pitch. LP and CR to start, why change it?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
REDOXO Posted April 11, 2004 Report Share Posted April 11, 2004 OH DEAR just for the record our best player particularly first half was Carey most of our forward play eminated from deep on the right flank he found good passes and there left sided midfielder was in his pocket.....Somebody I noticed gave him 6.....??????? Also for the record Peacock had a good game was always giving there central defenders problems and was not given a thing by a referee who missed almost everything.....No wonder the premier league sacked him..... The tide is turning C'mon City Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
REDOXO Posted April 11, 2004 Report Share Posted April 11, 2004 OH DEAR just for the record our best player particularly first half was Carey most of our forward play eminated from deep on the right flank he found good passes and there left sided midfielder was in his pocket.....Somebody I noticed gave him 6.....??????? Also for the record Peacock had a good game was always giving there central defenders problems and was not given a thing by a referee who missed almost everything.....No wonder the premier league sacked him..... The tide is turning C'mon City Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Red_Rat Posted April 11, 2004 Report Share Posted April 11, 2004 Philips 8 Carey 5 Butler 7 Coles 7 Hill 7 Murray 7 Tinnion 6 Doherty 7 Bell 6 Peacock 7 Roberts 7 Subs Miller 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spud55 Posted April 11, 2004 Report Share Posted April 11, 2004 I thought Carey was average. Going forward he was ok, but defensively he was not at his best, several times in the first half alone he was bailed out of trouble by Carey. My Ratings Phillips - 8 Hill - 8 Coles - 8 Butler - 8 Carey - 6 Bell - 7 Doherty - 7 Tinman - 6 Murray - 6 Peacock - 7 Robbo - 8.5 MoM Subs Miller - 5, sorry but he missed a sitter and his positioning was poor most of the time, had he been more alert he could have had another two great chances. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Rob Posted April 11, 2004 Report Share Posted April 11, 2004 Phillips 7 Carey 6 Coles 9 M.O.M Butler 8 Hill 8 Murray 6 Bell 7 Tinnion 6 Doherty 6 Peacock 7 Roberts 8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Topbuzz Posted April 11, 2004 Report Share Posted April 11, 2004 listening to it on the radio it sounded like Matty Hill's distribution was poor was that reflected during the game . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spud55 Posted April 11, 2004 Report Share Posted April 11, 2004 Mattys distribution was not at it's best, but he linked up well with bell with a couple of misplaced passes. Not poor by any means, certainly not the worst in our team by a long way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.