Jump to content

LondonRobin

Members
  • Posts

    161
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by LondonRobin

  1. 1 hour ago, Never to the dark side said:

    Very impressed with Citys first half team of full back Taine Anderson Dylan Kadji and striker Seb Palmer.Holden

    second half squad very impressed with Tommy Backwell

    P1080911

     

     

     

    P1080910P1080909

    Ben Achey that’s a new one …  For those who were there was Pearson present and could you see Owura Edwards around the first team this year?

  2. 1 hour ago, Silvio Dante said:

    Although I get what the OP is saying,  conflating one sentence with another for an unrelated crime is never helpful (FWIW I do agree that the Baby P sentence was lenient. The Bulger comparison is really unhelpful as the perpetrators were minors when undertaking so subject to different guidelines. There’s a whole other topic about the effectiveness of prison as a rehabilitation or deterrent there when the two have gone different routes, but not for this thread).

    So, you have to take the crime in isolation. And although I “get” that this may be seen as lower level, the truth is there is never a victimless crime. This was inherently a fraud that netted £7m. Do I think Sky prices would have reduced for others had £7m come their way? Probably not. But it is a base fact that committing a crime that denies income to the provider has the impact of pushing prices up on the remainder of the providers wares.

    More seriously, these “lower level” crimes are often windows into funding of more serious operations - not necessarily by the perpetrators here, but by their associates who they would have engaged with in setting up and running of the operation. The £10 fee partially finds its way into some darker places.

    Do I think Sky and BT cost too much? Hell yeah. Do I think sentencing for some crimes could be more? Yes. Do I, however, think that the perpetrators of a £7m fraud (that likely funnelled money into worse operations) deserve a long stretch? Absolutely.

    Take football out of it. Read it as a £7m fraud then ask if the sentence is just or not.

    Bear in mind who the victim, is in this case Rupert Murdoch, I couldn’t care less if he get defrauded out of 7 million as he probably avoids paying 7million tax a year also. Furthermore think about the people who benefit from their “crime”, football supporters who are getting priced out of games or can’t attend for a worthy reason, get to watch their team at a lesser expense from the comfort of their homes. It’s a bit different to a gang defrauding pensioners by preying on their vulnerabilities. Hence why we can’t just look at it as a “7 million pound fraud case” IMO - Also do we actually know they are involved in other illegal activities.

  3. 1 minute ago, Northern Red said:

    Best bit is that when none of those subs start on Saturday, you'll still get people on here asking why and complaining.

    Exactly Pearson should and I think will bench conway and Scott for Saturday, bring them on and hopefully they will play like Pearson has lit a rocket up their arse 

    • Like 2
  4. Right let’s put this to bed. I was at the bears game and after the match didn’t look too bad considering the rugby and rain during the game. Looked much worse after the City game suggesting the rain was the key factor here. 
     

    Secondly Bristol Bears don’t decide when they play European fixtures and as this was a knock-out round impossible to know for sure if Bears would qualify. 
     

    Thirdly we are getting a new surface in the summer

  5. 4 minutes ago, Super said:

    So poor from the restart.

    Yeah not ideal could have gone into HT winning, feel this game will go right to the wire. 

     

    Think yellow was fair as Williams was being tackled by someone else so already going down to ground 

×
×
  • Create New...