CotswoldRed

You'll not win any pub quizzes with answers like that

That's excellent. Another sporting fact - I've won as many Tour De France titles as Lance Armstrong.

85th min, 1-2 City

Eh?

Be safe in the knowledge you support a proper club. When they were at Elm Park none of the current brigade bothered to go.

There is always hope. And like the vomiting Brighton player on the pitch yesterday, we can all hope the Reading players had too much to drink on New Year's Eve You Reds.

No one cares? You, sir, are a troll. I've supported the team for 35 years... Just because you can't control your frustration you come out with such infantile bull.

These performances are as predictable as they are painful. We offer very little that is new or different. Like flogging a dead horse.

He's a stuck record. If we keep missing chances then we aren't capable of taking enough of them. Simple. His comments describe my own ability to serve aces past Andy Murray. I'd miss most of those chances. And that's because I'm shit at Tennis.

Good luck with that.

So why is Cotterill banging on about mid-table or better. Who's believing it?

You're trolling now. And badly too.

This is the first time in over 6000 posts that I've been so direct with anyone... You do post some utterly facile and cringeworthy crap.

No tradition? No ambition?

It's nothing short of ****ing embarrassment. Please Cotts, let's stop pretending we're better than we are or we deserve to be mid-table. I already think we're above where we deserve to be. Let's be honest and open with the club, the players, the fans and the media and get ready for a battle. Telling the players they've been hard done by won't help them any more.

.

Tiny squad. Lacking ability. It's going to be a massive hard slog until the final day, if we last that long. I normally enjoy hearing the manager's views whether we win or lose. This time, I've really heard it all before.

I think SC will be admitting to himself that his squad aren't anywhere near as good as he's telling us.

Is there an easy way to drill down to the reasons for the banning orders? I wouldn't mind betting most at BCFC are for things most people would be surprised actually warrant an order at all.

Was the bear included in the 5809 attendance?

Could we all take the same opinion please? Somewhere about in the middle would make us all get along with very little to talk about. Cheers and thanks.

As much as I'm disappointed today, I'm very much of the opinion we are not, as Cotterill has suggested, in a false position.

I'd like to agree. But I don't.

If we're as good as Cotterill keeps telling us then we should have been looking to win this comfortably.

Obviously to provide a few crosses for Wilbs. Just isn't good enough going past defenders.