westy Posted September 17, 2008 Report Share Posted September 17, 2008 ........Weale.......... Orr.........Carey......Fontaine......McAllister Sproule.....Elliott.....Johnson....McIndoe .Trundle......Adebola. Subs: Basso, Webster, Williams, Maynard, Noble (shame wilson won't be fit because I think Orr could do with a game on bench aswell) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bh_red Posted September 17, 2008 Report Share Posted September 17, 2008 Williams would be dropped for Skuse on the bench personally, Williams just isn't doing it at the moment Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jambodinho Posted September 17, 2008 Report Share Posted September 17, 2008 Williams would be dropped for Skuse on the bench personally, Williams just isn't doing it at the moment Nobody is ''doing it'' it for us at the moment. I can see why Johnson brought Williams in. He has good composure and rarely gives the ball away. He is like a more mobile Noble. As with Carle last season, i don't think he is being played in his preferred position. Williams on the bench instead of Noble for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roe Posted September 17, 2008 Report Share Posted September 17, 2008 I thought Skuse was pretty good against Birmingham so I don't think I'd drop him. Sproule may come in though and Trundle could well start with Dele. Weale is almost nailed on to start though as Basso's been struggling with his leg all season so far. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bh_red Posted September 17, 2008 Report Share Posted September 17, 2008 Nobody is ''doing it'' it for us at the moment. I can see why Johnson brought Williams in. He has good composure and rarely gives the ball away. He is like a more mobile Noble. As with Carle last season, i don't think he is being played in his preferred position. Williams on the bench instead of Noble for me. when posting I did think possibly Williams over Noble however Williams isn't look 100% fit at the moment, so would maybe leave him out. Agree though about the positioning which is the same problem Carle had last seen, I think both players would have been better playing more in Central midfield, it worked with Carle last season and he produced his best form, if we are too see the best of Williams I think he will need to play in the middle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elton red Posted September 17, 2008 Report Share Posted September 17, 2008 Weale Orr Fonts Carey Mac Mcindoe Elliott Lj Trunds Brooker/ Akinde ( if Brooker injured ) Maynard A bit different to the usual I know, worth A go though? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
red23 Posted September 17, 2008 Report Share Posted September 17, 2008 Weale Orr Fonts Carey Mac Mcindoe Elliott Lj Trunds Brooker/ Akinde ( if Brooker injured ) Maynard A bit different to the usual I know, worth A go though? As i put in another thread...thats the formation i'd like to see with different personnel ........Basso...... ..Orr.....Carey.....Fontaine.....McAllister.. .....Sproule.....Elliot.....Johnson........ .....Trundle......... ........Adebola.........Maynard............ We seem to be playing with very little width at the moment so theres no need for a spead of 4 across midfield...Sproule will add some width aswell as Trundle who often moves out onto the wing to get the ball at his feet. With Trundle in the team...its likely Maynard will get better service and hopefully get a goal or too. McIndoe must be dropped IMO...he's lost his first touch and dropping him would just let him know he's not an automatic pick. Also with this formation...we'd have McIndoe/Williams/Wilson on the bench to add more width through the game if required. No disrespect to Doncaster...but if were thinking of trying something else...them at home is probably the game to try it considering our next few Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dolman Pragmatist Posted September 17, 2008 Report Share Posted September 17, 2008 ........Weale.......... Orr.........Carey......Fontaine......McAllister Sproule.....Elliott.....Johnson....McIndoe .Trundle......Adebola. Subs: Basso, Webster, Williams, Maynard, Noble Absolutely spot on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whale Eye Beef Hooked Posted September 17, 2008 Report Share Posted September 17, 2008 .............BASSO............. ORR...........CAREY.............WEBSTER...FONTS .........JOHNSON..ELLIOT.MCINDOE ..........TRUNDLE.........BROOKER..........MAYNARD WEALE MCALLISTER ADEBOLA SPROULE SKUSE Not starting with Adebola just because he worked really hard last night and a rest would keep him fresh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redhyde Posted September 17, 2008 Report Share Posted September 17, 2008 Weale Orr, Carey, Fontaine, McAllister Sproule, Elliott (please god!), Johnson, McIndoe Adebola, Maynard Subs: Basso, Trundle, Williams, Webster, Skuse Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUPER REDS Posted September 17, 2008 Report Share Posted September 17, 2008 I think I go for a 442 formation its a game we should go to win,bring Noble in on the right,if Elloitt is ok for Skuse in the midfield Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ooRya Posted September 17, 2008 Report Share Posted September 17, 2008 .............WEALE. CAREY....WEBSTER....FONTAINE SPROULE..JOHNSON..ELLIOTT..MCINDOE .............TRUNDLE........... ...........MAYNARD...ADEBOLA.......... I think that would give Donny plenty to worry about! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ashcott Boy Posted September 17, 2008 Report Share Posted September 17, 2008 Weale Orr, Carey, Fontaine, McAllister Sproule, Elliott (please god!), Johnson, McIndoe Adebola, Maynard Subs: Basso, Trundle, Williams, Webster, Skuse Agreed. Although be tempted to put Akinde on the bench in place of Skuse/Williams. Before yesterdays game we were unbeaten, lets not change too much after one defeat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Humble Realist Posted September 17, 2008 Report Share Posted September 17, 2008 I thought Skuse was pretty good against Birmingham so I don't think I'd drop him. Sproule may come in though and Trundle could well start with Dele. Weale is almost nailed on to start though as Basso's been struggling with his leg all season so far. i really respect that everyone is entitled to their opinion but in my opinion SKuse was awful yesterday, espeically in the first half, he gave the ball away for their goal and was just shrugged off the ball. I don't know if the Skuse debate is based on where u sit at AG maybe, i sit high up and just see the guy get knocked off the ball, give the ball away needlessly. A lot of people really rate him and your not the first to say he did well yesterday, people either think he was good yesterday or absolutly awful. In my opinion(and its only my opinion) we wouldnt have lost that game yesterday if a fit Elliot was playing instead of Skuse Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andy g Posted September 17, 2008 Report Share Posted September 17, 2008 I think its a shame that the team that we stumbled upon at the end of last season has been broken up. With Carle, Trundle and Noble in the side we saw a lot more passing and fewer high balls (like in the first half last night) Obviously Carle would have to be replaced by Johnson or Williams, but worth trying Noble and Trundle in the team again ? On the other hand, its not been a bad start to the season and we've only lost one game so far - and that was to probably the best side in the division. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimmy ateyo Posted September 17, 2008 Report Share Posted September 17, 2008 As i put in another thread...thats the formation i'd like to see with different personnel ........Basso...... ..Orr.....Carey.....Fontaine.....McAllister.. .....Sproule.....Elliot.....Johnson........ .....Trundle......... ........Adebola.........Maynard............ We seem to be playing with very little width at the moment so theres no need for a spead of 4 across midfield...Sproule will add some width aswell as Trundle who often moves out onto the wing to get the ball at his feet. With Trundle in the team...its likely Maynard will get better service and hopefully get a goal or too. McIndoe must be dropped IMO...he's lost his first touch and dropping him would just let him know he's not an automatic pick. Also with this formation...we'd have McIndoe/Williams/Wilson on the bench to add more width through the game if required. No disrespect to Doncaster...but if were thinking of trying something else...them at home is probably the game to try it considering our next few why on earth would u play sproule ahead of mcindoe ? - sproule is a headless chicken, ok he played a bit better last night than usual but he still missed a one on one and CANT CROSS !!! Would much rather see mccindoe on the right even though hes left footed, but i think johnson could bring in elliott and trundle for maynard and skuse, cant see him changing formation though - the right side is a problem though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jordan Tansley Posted September 17, 2008 Report Share Posted September 17, 2008 BASSO ORR CAREY FONTAINE MCCALISTER MARVIN/SKUSE NOBLE WILLIAMS MCCINDOE DELE MAYNARD(last chance and stay left^^) WEALE LJ (if protecting a lead perhaps for maynard leaving dele on own and noble in hole) SPROULE( for mccindoe if he is as gash as he has been) TRUNDLE(on for dele at some point) WEBSTER Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Eamer Posted September 17, 2008 Report Share Posted September 17, 2008 ........Weale.......... Orr.........Carey......Fontaine......McAllister Sproule.....Elliott.....Johnson....McIndoe .Trundle......Adebola. Subs: Basso, Webster, Williams, Maynard, Noble Agree with most of that. Just not the Wilson in for Orr and would have Skuse on the bench instead of Noble, or in the starting 11 if Elliott isn't ready then him on the bench instead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dynamite Red Posted September 17, 2008 Report Share Posted September 17, 2008 Weale Orr, Carey, Fontaine, McAllister Sproule, Elliott, Johnson, McIndoe Trundle, Maynard Subs: Basso, Adebola, Williams, Webster, Skuse I would like to see Trundle and Maynard given a go up front as feel they would compliment each other plus this would help us play to our skills and keep the ball on the floor, Adebola always seems knackered after 60 min and would rather use him as an impact sub and would allow us to mix it up a bit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin Ian M Posted September 17, 2008 Admin Report Share Posted September 17, 2008 We haven't heard this officially (maybe as Johnson tries not to advertise injuries) but someone said last week that Noble had gone in for an operation. If true that would change a lot of the above sides. For Donny I'd go with the formation we finished last night's game but with the players to suit it. We look at our best when playing with wide-men so stick with the 4 across the middle and Trundle (as expected) looked decent behind a front two. To do that you need to go with a back 3 (as we did after Trundle's introduction) and at home against a side we should dominate, I don't see the issue with that. Weale Orr Carey Fontaine Sproule Elliot Johnson McIndoe* Trundle Adebola Maynard * under strict instructions to stay wide where he has produced his best performances The inclusion of 2 wide players also gets the best out of Johnson as when he receives the ball he actually has options to pass to rather than the current ball straight back to Liam who in turn lumps it long in the direction of Adebola or (stupefyingly) Maynard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rockin-robin Posted September 17, 2008 Report Share Posted September 17, 2008 For me it would be -----------------BASSO (If fit, otherwise Weale...obviously)------ ORR-----CAREY------FONTAINE-----McALISTER SPROULE-----WILLIAMS------ELLIOT------McINDOE MAYNARD---------ADEBOLA Subs: JOHNSON, TRUNDLE, WEBSTER, SKUSE, NOBLE This formation to start a game would never happen though! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
downendcity Posted September 17, 2008 Report Share Posted September 17, 2008 I suggest the following across the midfield Sproule Williams Johnson Scuse Elliott Noble Trundle McIndoe Obviously it's not viable in terms of also needing strikers and a defence, but with that midfield it would make bloody sure that McIndoe and Sproule stayed out wide enough! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shaun1105 Posted September 17, 2008 Report Share Posted September 17, 2008 As i put in another thread...thats the formation i'd like to see with different personnel ........Basso...... ..Orr.....Carey.....Fontaine.....McAllister.. .....Sproule.....Elliot.....Johnson........ .....Trundle......... ........Adebola.........Maynard............ We seem to be playing with very little width at the moment so theres no need for a spead of 4 across midfield...Sproule will add some width aswell as Trundle who often moves out onto the wing to get the ball at his feet. With Trundle in the team...its likely Maynard will get better service and hopefully get a goal or too. McIndoe must be dropped IMO...he's lost his first touch and dropping him would just let him know he's not an automatic pick. Also with this formation...we'd have McIndoe/Williams/Wilson on the bench to add more width through the game if required. No disrespect to Doncaster...but if were thinking of trying something else...them at home is probably the game to try it considering our next few yes with out a dout mckindoe need to be put on the bench but i would have skuse/williams instead of sproule Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miketh2nd Posted September 17, 2008 Report Share Posted September 17, 2008 I'm not sure if Trundle should start but if does start I would rather him in a 4-3-3 formation with Adebola and Maynard because last night most of the game we were playing high balls to Adebola and I would much rather Trundle up front than Mcindoe. As then every time we attack maybe they will mark Maynard a little less because we have 3 up front and then each time we attack Adebola will have two options to choose from. I think this is what GJ was trying to do in the first half albeit with Mcindoe and it just seemed the team hadn't had long enough with the new formation. However I don't think we wil go back to 4-4-2 until Elliot starts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maltshoveller Posted September 17, 2008 Report Share Posted September 17, 2008 My team would be ..weale..... orr.............carey..........fonts.............Jimmy mac .....skuce.........elliott............. ivan................McIndoe .........Trundle......adebola.......... By playing skuce and elliott in the middle it should make us more solid I would then tell the two wide men to say way out there,bomb forward and get some crosses into the box knowing they have the two in the centre covering them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miketh2nd Posted September 17, 2008 Report Share Posted September 17, 2008 My team would be ..weale..... orr.............carey..........fonts.............Jimmy mac .....skuce.........elliott............. ivan...McIndoe .........Trundle......adebola.......... By playing skuce and elliott in the middle it should make us more solid I would then tell the two wide men to say way out there,bomb forward and get some crosses into the box knowing they have the two in the centre covering them not meaning any offence but isn't that basically 424? or 624? Sorry I've obvisouly misunderstood but if u have two covering the defence but not attacking it pratically being defenders? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maltshoveller Posted September 17, 2008 Report Share Posted September 17, 2008 not meaning any offence but isn't that basically 424? or 624? Sorry I've obvisouly misunderstood but if u have two covering the defence but not attacking it pratically being defenders? Sorry its just how the post came out!!!! It would be a 4-4-2 Just saying with skuce and elliott holding the middle together it would give the two wide men more freedom to push forward Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimmy ateyo Posted September 17, 2008 Report Share Posted September 17, 2008 Sorry its just how the post came out!!!! It would be a 4-4-2 Just saying with skuce and elliott holding the middle together it would give the two wide men more freedom to push forward Weale Orr Carey Fontaine Mccalister Noble Elliott Johnson McIndoe Trundle Adebola Basso (if fit)/Henderson, Webster, Maynard, Skuse, Brooker (if fit).Sproule Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miketh2nd Posted September 17, 2008 Report Share Posted September 17, 2008 Sorry its just how the post came out!!!! It would be a 4-4-2 Just saying with skuce and elliott holding the middle together it would give the two wide men more freedom to push forward yeah sorry thougth I did misunderstand something there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
westy Posted September 17, 2008 Author Report Share Posted September 17, 2008 I suggest the following across the midfield Sproule Williams Johnson Scuse Elliott Noble Trundle McIndoe Obviously it's not viable in terms of also needing strikers and a defence, but with that midfield it would make bloody sure that McIndoe and Sproule stayed out wide enough! ++ - well done who ever found this one!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.