riddlesdown red Posted December 30, 2008 Report Share Posted December 30, 2008 Noticed the Sun gave Carle Man of the Match, it is about time we put this to be bed otherwise the same old stuff will come out twice next season as well (both to finish just outside top 6) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redfred Posted December 30, 2008 Report Share Posted December 30, 2008 Or McIndoe coming out to brag and boast of your victory, to get our players' attention (he hadn't really got any of our players attention for 90 minutes on the pitch given his ineffectual performance), before getting (rightfully) a damned good hiding. Swings. Roundabouts and all that jazz. Hypocrisy, wonderful, innit? It was four on to one, which was about right for a team full of aggressive bullies. Clearly that delightful nutmeg McIndoe produced on Carle really got his goat. Oh how we cheered at that 'ineffectual' piece of play! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
petehinton Posted December 31, 2008 Report Share Posted December 31, 2008 I'm suprised Carle's teeth didn't do serious harm to Mcindoe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nibor Posted December 31, 2008 Report Share Posted December 31, 2008 Or McIndoe coming out to brag and boast of your victory, to get our players' attention (he hadn't really got any of our players attention for 90 minutes on the pitch given his ineffectual performance), before getting (rightfully) a damned good hiding. Swings. Roundabouts and all that jazz. Hypocrisy, wonderful, innit? Yep, he certainly didn't have Carle's attention when he megged him. I think you'll find the disagreement started with an elbow from Carle, not surprising he's learning to be a dirty s**t at palace really. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bh red Posted December 31, 2008 Report Share Posted December 31, 2008 Yep, he certainly didn't have Carle's attention when he megged him. I think you'll find the disagreement started with an elbow from Carle, not surprising he's learning to be a dirty s**t at palace really. to be fair, he was the same at City, but then people understandable didn't mind as it was our player, I recall warnock going apesh!t after the play off first leg as he felt Carle should have been sent off for us due to a horrible taclke. people didn't mind it then though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nibor Posted December 31, 2008 Report Share Posted December 31, 2008 to be fair, he was the same at City, but then people understandable didn't mind as it was our player, I recall warnock going apesh!t after the play off first leg as he felt Carle should have been sent off for us due to a horrible taclke. people didn't mind it then though Making a bad tackle because he got the timing wrong is very different to throwing elbows and he never did the latter here. Look at Colin ######'s comments about talking to him at half time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin Ian M Posted December 31, 2008 Admin Report Share Posted December 31, 2008 I expect he does, but he was forced out of City of course - I have heard nothing other than he was happy here... But were others happy that he was here? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cheese Posted December 31, 2008 Report Share Posted December 31, 2008 But were others happy that he was here? I would have thought someone was too happy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest RobbieTurner Posted December 31, 2008 Report Share Posted December 31, 2008 But were others happy that he was here? Well obviously McIndoe wasn't for one reason or another - yeah don't worry we've already been warned off of putting on here what their 'previous' was all about, but how about mini me.....cant imagine he was happy that daddy had a potential replacement for him ? Come on Madger - spill the beans..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lack of Action Man Posted December 31, 2008 Report Share Posted December 31, 2008 To put it simply would warnock or a palace representative have ever gone out to Australia to look at Nick Carle and how he played? I don't think so. Therefore Colin signed Nick Carle based on his appearences for this football club - Colin must've thought that Carle was worth using £ 1 mil on based on how he played in his games with us. To then say that Carle was playing like he was here makes no sense - is Colin saying that he used £1 mil pounds on potential to adapt to the "Warnock mentality" ? It's obviously another dig at us but coming from Colin it is nout to expect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.