winterbournered Posted September 1, 2009 Report Share Posted September 1, 2009 Ben Watson joins QPR on season long deal,always been impressed with Watson haven't seen alot of Sno. Would Watson have been a better option,any similarties??? have we got a better player???? Opinions please people!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
petehinton Posted September 1, 2009 Report Share Posted September 1, 2009 much rather have Sno, so much more experience Watson is a v.good player, just not yet... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Timmis DK Posted September 1, 2009 Report Share Posted September 1, 2009 much rather have Sno, so much more experience Watson is a v.good player, just not yet... Two different players IMO. Sno is class, and very versatile, no doubt about that and I hope that he really comes good with us! But to say Sno has so much more experience than Watson is a little bit silly. Sure Sno is well travelled and has been around the international setup- but you make it sound like Watson is an unknown quantity! Ben Watson is a very good, proven Championship quality footballer who by the end of the season will have made over 200 appearances at this level! We'll have to be on top of our game when we come up against him at Loftus Road. Good thing we've already played QPR and won already this season if you ask me. Fantastic bit of business by them. He's probably very happy to be back in London too.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
internetjef Posted September 1, 2009 Report Share Posted September 1, 2009 Both would have been good but we didnt really need either plus Watson has been a long term QPR target and there is no way he would have chosen us over them even if we had been in. i think we should just be happy with the added bonus of Sno, on top of the signing of Saborio who was a real necessity up front Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.