Bristol_South_End Posted July 17, 2011 Report Share Posted July 17, 2011 I went on the Ashton Gate tour yesterday, well worth doing if you'd like to see a bit more behind the scenes of the club. On one of the walls by the kit room there was a poster hung up with the provisional numbers for the season, I know these could change but they seem pretty likely to be the ones we'll see next season. I took a photo but it's too big a file for me to upload so I'll just post the numbers here instead: 1: James 2: - 3: Macca 4: Fontaine 5: Nyatanga 6: Carey 7: Elliott 8: Kilkenny 9: Stead 10: Maynard 11: Woolford 12: Taylor 13: - 14: Skuse 15: Pitman 16: Clarkson 17: Bolasie 18: Wilson 19: Ribeiro 20: JCR 21: Cisse 22: Gerken 23: Edwards 24: Jackson 25: Ball 26: Lennox 27: Adomah 28: Reid 29: Holloway 30: Muggeridge 31: Bryan 32: Carey (GK) 33: Johnson 34: Hunt 35: Stewart 36: - (Hendo was crossed out here) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bristol_South_End Posted July 17, 2011 Author Report Share Posted July 17, 2011 Jesus Christ we have a big squad Indeed, it's even more ridiculous when you think we don't have a first choice right back and only one left back... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bcfc24 Posted July 17, 2011 Report Share Posted July 17, 2011 That squad has relegation written all over it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
petehinton Posted July 17, 2011 Report Share Posted July 17, 2011 would be interesting to know what Clarkson would have felt when he was given/asked to be moved to 16 from 9, bit of a statement that he won't be starting much? Stewart being moved right to the bottom of the pile confirms that Millen wants him gone, too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ron Posted July 17, 2011 Report Share Posted July 17, 2011 That squad has relegation written all over it No, it doesn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex#40 Posted July 17, 2011 Report Share Posted July 17, 2011 No, it doesn't. I agree with Ronnabe. No it doesn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRL Posted July 17, 2011 Report Share Posted July 17, 2011 No, it doesn't. It does, it's just in white ink Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bcfc24 Posted July 17, 2011 Report Share Posted July 17, 2011 No, it doesn't. It does our squad as a whole is just not good enough Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BCFC Jordan Posted July 17, 2011 Report Share Posted July 17, 2011 James Skuse or Ribeiro Wilson or Carey Fontaine New LB Albert Kilkenny Cisse or Elliott Bolasie? Maynard or Pitman if he leaves Stead Looks a decent enough squad and I'm sure within the next three weeks, Keith will get some premier loanees in. When you compare it to other teams like Doncaster, Palace, Barnsley, Peterborough etc are team is strong enough to stay up on paper. Mid table finish again for us this year imo or top half depending on if we can keep Nicky and what loanees we get in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wardie Posted July 17, 2011 Report Share Posted July 17, 2011 I went on the Ashton Gate tour yesterday, well worth doing if you'd like to see a bit more behind the scenes of the club. On one of the walls by the kit room there was a poster hung up with the provisional numbers for the season, I know these could change but they seem pretty likely to be the ones we'll see next season. I took a photo but it's too big a file for me to upload so I'll just post the numbers here instead: 1: James 2: - 3: Macca 4: Fontaine 5: Nyatanga 6: Carey 7: Elliott 8: Kilkenny 9: Stead 10: Maynard 11: Woolford 12: Taylor 13: - 14: Skuse 15: Pitman 16: Clarkson 17: Bolasie 18: Wilson 19: Ribeiro 20: JCR 21: Cisse 22: Gerken 23: Edwards 24: Jackson 25: Ball 26: Lennox 27: Adomah 28: Reid 29: Holloway 30: Muggeridge 31: Bryan 32: Carey (GK) 33: Johnson 34: Hunt 35: Stewart 36: - (Hendo was crossed out here) Jesus Christ we have a big squad Bearing in mind that players numbered 23 to 32 are going to be part of the development squad, and number 34 is a waste of space Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
numbeast Posted July 17, 2011 Report Share Posted July 17, 2011 Bearing in mind that players numbered 23 to 32 are going to be part of the development squad, and number 34 is a waste of space A bit harsh on Albert isn't it? Player of the season last term and now relegated to the development squad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dezgimed Posted July 18, 2011 Report Share Posted July 18, 2011 The starting 11 is close to being strong, the next 11 are pretty much garbage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davros Posted July 18, 2011 Report Share Posted July 18, 2011 The start of this thread is good the posts slagging off the team are idiotic they havent even kicked a ball yet! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wardie Posted July 18, 2011 Report Share Posted July 18, 2011 A bit harsh on Albert isn't it? Player of the season last term and now relegated to the development squad. Ha! oh yeah my bad! well all of them except Albert then! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.