The Hippo Posted February 9, 2012 Report Share Posted February 9, 2012 Could play Skippy theme when Kilkenny comes on as a sub?? Would really get the gate bouncing! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkeh Posted February 9, 2012 Report Share Posted February 9, 2012 Even if we have a strong fit squad, we won't get anything from this game. thats the sprit lets get behind the team Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex_BCFC Posted February 9, 2012 Report Share Posted February 9, 2012 thats the sprit lets get behind the team To be fair, I'm going but not expecting much especially with such a lot of injuries in defence. Could see a late loan signing tomorrow if desperate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skuuuuuuse Posted February 9, 2012 Report Share Posted February 9, 2012 Should have brought Tommy Doc in for a Henry and Scholes-esque signing to solve the centre mid position. Just signed for Bath City. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkeh Posted February 9, 2012 Report Share Posted February 9, 2012 Spence also out injured, Time to go 3-5-2 me thinks Skuse-Fontaine - McGiven back 3 Foster Pearson wing backs Elliot Cisse Albert in the middle Wood Pitman upfron Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
notsobigfatdave Posted February 9, 2012 Report Share Posted February 9, 2012 Skippy. TCh Tch Tch...tch tch tch tch....Whats that Skip problems on the training ground.... injurred players...youve called the flying Doctor...good boy Skip.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
notsobigfatdave Posted February 9, 2012 Report Share Posted February 9, 2012 Spence also out injured, Time to go 3-5-2 me thinks Skuse-Fontaine - McGiven back 3 Foster Pearson wing backs Elliot Cisse Albert in the middle Wood Pitman upfron 3- 4 -3 ....if we are going to get stuffed we may as well go down in flames... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Garland-sweden Posted February 9, 2012 Report Share Posted February 9, 2012 Nyatanga probably not fit on saturday. Cisse cb, is there more options? Elliot back in midfield. If we dont gt any loan in think Cisse play in defence. Hull is not Barca think we got a proper chance to take point or points. COME ON YOU REDS!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slave to the rhythm Posted February 9, 2012 Report Share Posted February 9, 2012 Spence also out injured, Time to go 3-5-2 me thinks Skuse-Fontaine - McGiven back 3 Foster Pearson wing backs Elliot Cisse Albert in the middle Wood Pitman upfron How the heck can Spence be injured when he never plays???? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRL Posted February 9, 2012 Report Share Posted February 9, 2012 How the heck can Spence be injured when he never plays???? Got a sickness bug apparently, quite convenient just when his needed. Maybe a smoke screen not to have him in the team for his traing ground indiscretion? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkeh Posted February 10, 2012 Report Share Posted February 10, 2012 How the heck can Spence be injured when he never plays???? he plays for the reserves Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ashton1 Posted February 10, 2012 Report Share Posted February 10, 2012 It wasn't necessarily an attack on you mucker,just I'm sick of reading our player'snamewritten wrong. As you said howeversome are predictive text or typos andsoon. But I don't think that can account forallof them Ooooh betty, the gas have done a whoopsy on the carpet. It's beret not carpet, I'm feed up with people getting thier 70's triv wrong !! :-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
herman Posted February 10, 2012 Report Share Posted February 10, 2012 how convenient that spence has been "sent home" instead of, god i don't know, maybe actually playing back 4 for me would be: skuse fonts mcgivern foster Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taylor10 Posted February 10, 2012 Report Share Posted February 10, 2012 Don't think I could trust mcGivern at cb. For me tomorrow, rightly or wrongly we have to forget about the fact 4-4-2 doesn't work. It's the only formation we can play tomorrow with the players we have as we don't want square pegs in round holes. I would go..... James Foster, skuse, Fontaine, mcGivern Adomah, cisse, Marv, Pearson Wood stead/pitman I would happily see us try this formation rather than the 4-5-1/4-3-3 and bring in weak individuals such as JCR or wooly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
myol'man Posted February 10, 2012 Report Share Posted February 10, 2012 If Pitman doesn't get at least part of a game this Saturday he might as well pack his bags Jamo to drive the bus? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JammyOne Posted February 10, 2012 Report Share Posted February 10, 2012 Don't think I could trust mcGivern at cb. For me tomorrow, rightly or wrongly we have to forget about the fact 4-4-2 doesn't work. It's the only formation we can play tomorrow with the players we have as we don't want square pegs in round holes. I would go..... James Foster, skuse, Fontaine, mcGivern Adomah, cisse, Marv, Pearson Wood stead/pitman I would happily see us try this formation rather than the 4-5-1/4-3-3 and bring in weak individuals such as JCR or wooly Skuse cannot play CB so Cisse would need to play CB, and Skuse is a better CM than Cisse anyhow. Can't play 442 as Adohma will need to serve Wood the ball and there would be no one in midfield to make a pass. 442 just isn't an option. ------------------James----------------------- Foster---Cisse---Fontaine---McGivern ------------------Skuse----------------------- -----------Elliot---------------Pearson---------- Adomah---------------------------------JCR --------------------Wood--------------------- It's the only way I can see it happening. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Posted February 10, 2012 Report Share Posted February 10, 2012 Skuse cannot play CB so Cisse would need to play CB, and Skuse is a better CM than Cisse anyhow. Can't play 442 as Adohma will need to serve Wood the ball and there would be no one in midfield to make a pass. 442 just isn't an option. ------------------James----------------------- Foster---Cisse---Frontaine---McGivern ------------------Skuse----------------------- -----------Elliot---------------Pearson---------- Adohma---------------------------------JCR --------------------Wood--------------------- It's the only way I can see it happening. Adohma? Adomah. Frontaine? Fontaine Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Posted February 10, 2012 Report Share Posted February 10, 2012 this is an absolute home banker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redcliffe 78 Posted February 10, 2012 Report Share Posted February 10, 2012 this is an absolute home banker. Like Southampton game & West Ham?, these are the games we seem to bring out the big performence, when really needed, i'M going 1-0 City. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JammyOne Posted February 10, 2012 Report Share Posted February 10, 2012 Adohma? Adomah. Frontaine? Fontaine My bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nogbad the Bad Posted February 10, 2012 Report Share Posted February 10, 2012 Skuse cannot play CB so Cisse would need to play CB, and Skuse is a better CM than Cisse anyhow. Can't play 442 as Adohma will need to serve Wood the ball and there would be no one in midfield to make a pass. 442 just isn't an option. ------------------James----------------------- Foster---Cisse---Fontaine---McGivern ------------------Skuse----------------------- -----------Elliot---------------Pearson---------- Adomah---------------------------------JCR --------------------Wood--------------------- It's the only way I can see it happening. Skuse actually made his debut for City as a centre back and looked very good. At that time - before he became a jack of all trades - it was considered his natural, and best, position. He's not a better CM than Cisse, certainly not defensively, the two have different qualities for that position but Cisse is the more assured and consistent. Judging by his past performances there for City what we do know for certain is that Cisse is an awful centre back and we're asking for trouble if we play him there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frank Reynolds Posted February 10, 2012 Report Share Posted February 10, 2012 For me: James Foster Wilson Fontaine McGivern Adomah Cisse Elliott Pearson Wood Pitman Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chucky Posted February 10, 2012 Report Share Posted February 10, 2012 For me: James Foster Wilson Fontaine McGivern Adomah Cisse Elliott Pearson Wood Pitman Wilson is banned Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cider red Posted February 10, 2012 Report Share Posted February 10, 2012 Skuse actually made his debut for City as a centre back and looked very good. . You mean the game we lost 5-0 at luton? I would have thought mciness will stick cisse at the back...much rather have him in midfield though. if spence is available he surely has to play cb with fonts with foster rb? James foster rb fonts cb spence cb mcgivern lb elliot cisse and pearson central three adomah (free role) wood st Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taylor10 Posted February 10, 2012 Report Share Posted February 10, 2012 Skuse cannot play CB so Cisse would need to play CB, and Skuse is a better CM than Cisse anyhow. Can't play 442 as Adohma will need to serve Wood the ball and there would be no one in midfield to make a pass. 442 just isn't an option. ------------------James----------------------- Foster---Cisse---Fontaine---McGivern ------------------Skuse----------------------- -----------Elliot---------------Pearson---------- Adomah---------------------------------JCR --------------------Wood--------------------- It's the only way I can see it happening. I am assuming you haven't been to many games this season then if you think Skuse is a better midfielder than Cisse!? As a previous post mentioned, Skuse started his career as a center half. Would rather Skuse CB as Cisse has been dodgy when he has played at the back in the past. I agree about the 4-4-2, dont think we can play it even when we have our best team, but for me tomorrow, with all the injuries and suspensions we have, is about playing our strongest possible 11. For me this has to be in a 4-4-2 as I do not want players like JCR or Woolford playing, both are not exactly the type of players you want when you have your backs against the wall! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bearded_red Posted February 10, 2012 Report Share Posted February 10, 2012 Although playing 442 seems to mean we leave a massive risk of getting overrun, with the injuries/suspensions we have, I would play it tomorrow. We have as well go with two up top and and have the greater goal threat that playing Brett will give us as the alternative seems to be playing 451 with Woolford/Campbell-Ryce on the left. Not ideal! Hopefully Nyatanga manages to play and we are able to field a back 4 of Skuse, Fontaine, Nyatanga and Foster as McGivern really does give me nightmares. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redcliffe 78 Posted February 10, 2012 Report Share Posted February 10, 2012 Elliott back, hope he is fully fit and not risking him, massive part of us staying in the division. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taylor10 Posted February 10, 2012 Report Share Posted February 10, 2012 Although playing 442 seems to mean we leave a massive risk of getting overrun, with the injuries/suspensions we have, I would play it tomorrow. We have as well go with two up top and and have the greater goal threat that playing Brett will give us as the alternative seems to be playing 451 with Woolford/Campbell-Ryce on the left. Not ideal! Hopefully Nyatanga manages to play and we are able to field a back 4 of Skuse, Fontaine, Nyatanga and Foster as McGivern really does give me nightmares. +1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clevedonBCFC Posted February 10, 2012 Report Share Posted February 10, 2012 Defiantly agree with pitman starting as what is the point of us having him. Wood is a good striker but until the summer we don't have a m city striker that has the goal scoring ability. We need a very good striker that finishes the balls we put in from the wing and has the confidence and ability to put the ball in the back of the net when 1 on 1 with the keeper Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nogbad the Bad Posted February 10, 2012 Report Share Posted February 10, 2012 You mean the game we lost 5-0 at luton? I would have thought mciness will stick cisse at the back...much rather have him in midfield though. if spence is available he surely has to play cb with fonts with foster rb? James foster rb fonts cb spence cb mcgivern lb elliot cisse and pearson central three adomah (free role) wood st No, I didn't mean the 5-0 at Luton. I was thinking more a televised game at Sheff. Weds. If it wasn't Skuse's actual debut it was amongst his first games, and he looked good there. CB was his original position and always supposedly going to be his permanent position but that was many years ago. Due his perceived versatility he still hasn't got one, just a number of positions where he can be good, but is inconsistent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.