Will Rollason Posted December 9, 2012 Report Share Posted December 9, 2012 Officially sucks. i thank you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jordan Tansley Posted December 9, 2012 Report Share Posted December 9, 2012 It's not even one particular aspect of it, it's just shoddy from top to bottom. Barely even go on it now, just rely on the twitter feed for news and this site! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eric04 Posted December 9, 2012 Report Share Posted December 9, 2012 It's not even one particular aspect of it, it's just shoddy from top to bottom. Barely even go on it now, just rely on the twitter feed for news and this site! +1 You can get all the main details elsewhere now and the OS is so slow and fiddly to use. Hope the club aren't tied into that deal for too long. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
... Posted December 9, 2012 Report Share Posted December 9, 2012 Yes, they changed the website ............. and made it WORSE! Well done the BCFC IT dept. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red_Jim Posted December 9, 2012 Report Share Posted December 9, 2012 If you try it on a mobile it's even worse! I tried to load McInnes' interview yesterday and every time I clicked the link it just refreshed the home page! Total garbage! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redrobbin Posted December 9, 2012 Report Share Posted December 9, 2012 Yes I much preferred the old web site. A lot more user friendly. You knew where everything was, better interface than the updated version. " if it ain't broke why fix it?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRL Posted December 9, 2012 Report Share Posted December 9, 2012 Yes, they changed the website ............. and made it WORSE! Well done the BCFC IT dept. Nowt to do with bcfc it dept. The website has been contracted out to cowboys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Will Rollason Posted December 9, 2012 Author Report Share Posted December 9, 2012 Yes I much preferred the old web site. A lot more user friendly. You knew where everything was, better interface than the updated version. " if it ain't broke why fix it?" yeah, dont want to sound like yer grandad but it was better!! in the old days!! Seriously if you have to dig or guess where to find info on a website in this day and age something aint right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
REBS14 Posted December 9, 2012 Report Share Posted December 9, 2012 The one gripe i have is player is hit or miss, sometimes doesnt load, cuts out midway - tried on several browsers doesnt like chrome one bit - However this has nothing to do with the club, as someone has already pointed out its been contracted out, most other Football club sites are an identical format Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uncle Albert Posted December 9, 2012 Report Share Posted December 9, 2012 If you try it on a mobile it's even worse! I tried to load McInnes' interview yesterday and every time I clicked the link it just refreshed the home page! Total garbage! Don't even get me started on the mobile site! I didn't realise they could make a website worse that the actual one...somehow, they've managed to achieve it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon atyeo is my dad Posted December 9, 2012 Report Share Posted December 9, 2012 It's rubbish Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
havanatopia Posted December 9, 2012 Report Share Posted December 9, 2012 It is like a family of 4 in the 70's hitting hard times and down-sizing from a questionably average Austin Princess to a emphatic piece of garbage in a Morris Marina. And all because the company Daddy works for is trying to save money and gives him a hard shoulder loving tin can. City have been force fed a Marina and told to 'sell' it to the fans. One assumes the unspoken word is that the Football League expects the fans to be easily accepting because, de facto, we are all stupid amoebic morons who will lap it all up like sheep. Meanwhile the Football League car park is full of Jags, LR's and Kraut Wagons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redrobbin Posted December 9, 2012 Report Share Posted December 9, 2012 Here Here will. But sounds like we are stuck with it. Like one poster has said we won't be the only ones. If you look at other teams websites itlooks like the same company do them. I mean just the way it's presented just puts you off. A big thumbs down.!!! yeah, dont want to sound like yer grandad but it was better!! in the old days!! Seriously if you have to dig or guess where to find info on a website in this day and age something aint right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redsquirrel Posted December 9, 2012 Report Share Posted December 9, 2012 It is like a family of 4 in the 70's hitting hard times and down-sizing from a questionably average Austin Princess to a emphatic piece of garbage in a Morris Marina. And all because the company Daddy works for is trying to save money and gives him a hard shoulder loving tin can. City have been force fed a Marina and told to 'sell' it to the fans. One assumes the unspoken word is that the Football League expects the fans to be easily accepting because, de facto, we are all stupid amoebic morons who will lap it all up like sheep. Meanwhile the Football League car park is full of Jags, LR's and Kraut Wagons. sooner have a marina than the rest of the garbage in that list,they were hardcore Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eco Posted December 9, 2012 Report Share Posted December 9, 2012 Currently says they have extended highlights on player. They're not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MichaelRobartes Posted December 9, 2012 Report Share Posted December 9, 2012 To be fair it was some achievement to take a website that was pretty awful to start with and actually make it worse! I know it's not the club's doing but it's still funny. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedZepperin Posted December 9, 2012 Report Share Posted December 9, 2012 The thing I like best about the updated features on Player is the way they have done away with the five minute time lag on the score. Back in the old days, you would be listening to the game and they would be showing the score from five minutes previous. Now it's been upgraded to about an hour. So, for a lot of the games this season, I thought we were scraping a crafty nil-nil result when we were actually being trashed by some crappy team or other. Happy days. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Will Rollason Posted December 9, 2012 Author Report Share Posted December 9, 2012 It is like a family of 4 in the 70's hitting hard times and down-sizing from a questionably average Austin Princess to a emphatic piece of garbage in a Morris Marina. And all because the company Daddy works for is trying to save money and gives him a hard shoulder loving tin can. City have been force fed a Marina and told to 'sell' it to the fans. One assumes the unspoken word is that the Football League expects the fans to be easily accepting because, de facto, we are all stupid amoebic morons who will lap it all up like sheep. Meanwhile the Football League car park is full of Jags, LR's and Kraut Wagons. loving this analogy, my dad had a car hire firm in the seventies so i saw a lot of motors and believe it or not one of the best was a Marina 1800xl or whatever, went like soot off a snowball i can almost feel the g force now They Princess's mind they were utter toilet ..... Now........ how about a TR7........ Proper!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chalky Posted December 9, 2012 Report Share Posted December 9, 2012 I actually prefer the new OS and I'm usually opposed to any change. Having said that I did prefer the version before the last one to the current one. If anyone can remember the main difference was it had considerably less adverts plastered everywhere! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CamBCFC Posted December 9, 2012 Report Share Posted December 9, 2012 Yes, they changed the website ............. and made it WORSE! Well done the BCFC IT dept. Club has no say in it. Taxi for Taxi For Rennie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Betelgeuse Posted December 9, 2012 Report Share Posted December 9, 2012 I can't get on with it so I rarely use it these days. Nothing wrong with the old one imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger Red Hat Posted December 10, 2012 Report Share Posted December 10, 2012 What is that stupid black bar nonsense on the bottom of the page ffs? It is truely a webshite. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fiale Posted December 10, 2012 Report Share Posted December 10, 2012 Said the other week - we as a multi-million pound club in a city of 300,00 have a worse site than Fleetwood Town http://www.fleetwoodtownfc.com/ pop 26,000 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkeh Posted December 10, 2012 Report Share Posted December 10, 2012 Said the other week - we as a multi-million pound club in a city of 300,00 have a worse site than Fleetwood Town http://www.fleetwoodtownfc.com/ pop 26,000 Fleetwood town wasn't covered under the football league agreement as they were not part of the league when it was sold we were, Its nothing to do with the club they had no say, infact we held off as long as possible in switching over Bean_Head will confirm that and I'm sure he hates the new site with a passion, Don't blame the club its nothing to do with us blame the football league Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex_BCFC Posted December 10, 2012 Report Share Posted December 10, 2012 I like the old one. New one is shocking - really difficult to find what you want and looks poor too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gazred Posted December 10, 2012 Report Share Posted December 10, 2012 One thing that really annoys me with it, if i click on an article and its of x length, i get 2 thirds of the way down it then have to "click to read more" making it reload the entire page instead of just loading up the extra text. When loaded it turns out only to be a few paragraphs. Why not just have it all on there in the first place? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rocky Posted December 10, 2012 Report Share Posted December 10, 2012 To be fair Adam Baker delayed and delayed this new pile of turd, he dislikes it but had no choice as others have said above. I think we were in a group of the last 5 teams to have it It's cack, the mobile version is even worse, I didn't really like the previous one either but it was certainly much better than this seasons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkeh Posted December 10, 2012 Report Share Posted December 10, 2012 To be fair Adam Baker delayed and delayed this new pile of turd, he dislikes it but had no choice as others have said above. I think we were in a group of the last 5 teams to have it It's cack, the mobile version is even worse, I didn't really like the previous one either but it was certainly much better than this seasons. I think we were the last team to change tbh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aizoon Posted December 10, 2012 Report Share Posted December 10, 2012 Nowt to do with bcfc it dept. The website has been contracted out to cowboys. Makes a change. Most of the IT work is contracted out to Indians. BOOM BOOM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger Red Hat Posted December 10, 2012 Report Share Posted December 10, 2012 Makes a change. Most of the IT work is contracted out to Indians. BOOM BOOM That's my sort of humour, Basil. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.