Philly The Kid Posted December 25, 2012 Report Share Posted December 25, 2012 Just a bit of light hearted fun!! Merry Christmas... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
East end Forever Posted December 25, 2012 Report Share Posted December 25, 2012 HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redsquirrel Posted December 25, 2012 Report Share Posted December 25, 2012 i read the title then thought of the topic about a very rich chairman :laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craven arms Posted December 25, 2012 Report Share Posted December 25, 2012 Its not a laughing matter I think AF is right could have been very serious.a ball being blasted in the back of your head traveling a 90 mph from 3 yards..........yeah funny Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRUEBRIT66 Posted December 25, 2012 Report Share Posted December 25, 2012 Its not a laughing matter I think AF is right could have been very serious.a ball being blasted in the back of your head traveling a 90 mph from 3 yards..........yeah funny QUIT YOUR JIBBA JABBA .....................Its a joke Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Portland Bill Posted December 25, 2012 Report Share Posted December 25, 2012 Its not a laughing matter I think AF is right could have been very serious.a ball being blasted in the back of your head traveling a 90 mph from 3 yards..........yeah funny Imo, the only reason Ferguson came out with such rubbish is to deflect the fact Van Persil should have been sent off. Williams,didn't do it on purpose( when you watch it at real speed rather than the super slow mo they kept showing) but Persi lost the plot and went to attack him. Sending off for the Persi I say. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BCFC96 Posted December 25, 2012 Report Share Posted December 25, 2012 Its not a laughing matter I think AF is right could have been very serious.a ball being blasted in the back of your head traveling a 90 mph from 3 yards..........yeah funny 90mph? you're joking right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bcfcbrowners Posted December 25, 2012 Report Share Posted December 25, 2012 Imo, the only reason Ferguson came out with such rubbish is to deflect the fact Van Persil should have been sent off. Williams,didn't do it on purpose( when you watch it at real speed rather than the super slow mo they kept showing) but Persi lost the plot and went to attack him. Sending off for the Persi I say. have you had ur inlaws round today?? if so u need to lay of the gusset sniffing for a while ,williams didnt do it on purpose surely thats banter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRUEBRIT66 Posted December 25, 2012 Report Share Posted December 25, 2012 90mph? you're joking right? 92.6mph actually and Ive just had my son fire a plastic bullet at my head (83.2 mph) so I have to agree with Craven and changed my opinion.....................disgusting, ban him for life. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craven arms Posted December 25, 2012 Report Share Posted December 25, 2012 90mph? you're joking right? go on then mr physics man,enlighten me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRUEBRIT66 Posted December 25, 2012 Report Share Posted December 25, 2012 go on then mr physics man,enlighten me. Either your really boring,bored or very funny..................cant work it out? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Philly The Kid Posted December 25, 2012 Author Report Share Posted December 25, 2012 have you had ur inlaws round today?? if so u need to lay of the gusset sniffing for a while ,williams didnt do it on purpose surely thats banter Gusset sniffing? That certainly beats housey housey, musical chairs or pin the tail on the donkey.... No wonder our family Christmases are so boring, I'll wake gran up I think.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Portland Bill Posted December 25, 2012 Report Share Posted December 25, 2012 have you had ur inlaws round today?? if so u need to lay of the gusset sniffing for a while ,williams didnt do it on purpose surely thats banter No, we were round there's . Seriously though, we may as well get players to wear crash helmets, players get hit all the time by the ball,no bones broken,keepers get the ball in the head,face,arm and everywhere else and no broken bones. Van Persi was well enough to jump straight up and try and attack someone,proof if it was indeed needed, that it didn't even hurt him. Ferguson is a master at over reacting and spin, if that incident was the other way round and Williams had jumped up and attacked Van Persie, he would be saying Williams should have seen red. Imo of course Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fordy62 Posted December 25, 2012 Report Share Posted December 25, 2012 Its not a laughing matter I think AF is right could have been very serious.a ball being blasted in the back of your head traveling a 90 mph from 3 yards..........yeah funny Please tell me that this is a joke? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bcfcbrowners Posted December 25, 2012 Report Share Posted December 25, 2012 No, we were round there's . Seriously though, we may as well get players to wear crash helmets, players get hit all the time by the ball,no bones broken,keepers get the ball in the head,face,arm and everywhere else and no broken bones. Van Persi was well enough to jump straight up and try and attack someone,proof if it was indeed needed, that it didn't even hurt him. Ferguson is a master at over reacting and spin, if that incident was the other way round and Williams had jumped up and attacked Van Persie, he would be saying Williams should have seen red. Imo of course with u on most of that billbo but i aint havin the williams didnt do it on purpose bit he new exactly what he was doing as for the fergie thing if williams hadnt of done it we wouldnt even be talking about it merry snifmass Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Philly The Kid Posted December 25, 2012 Author Report Share Posted December 25, 2012 Well I thought the poster was amusing in a satirical way. I clearly didn't reckon with Craven Arms sickly disposition, unless, of course, he was being satirical as well.... But somehow, I doubt it... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CiderArmyy Posted December 25, 2012 Report Share Posted December 25, 2012 Hopefully they ban footballs from the beautiful game.. disgrace. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BITW Posted December 25, 2012 Report Share Posted December 25, 2012 Its not a laughing matter I think AF is right could have been very serious.a ball being blasted in the back of your head traveling a 90 mph from 3 yards..........ye . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BCFC96 Posted December 25, 2012 Report Share Posted December 25, 2012 go on then mr physics man,enlighten me. have you actually watched it? from 3 yards away a ball would not get to 90mph for a start. im not saying it wasn't dangerous but people are really exaggerating. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Esmond Million's Bung Posted December 25, 2012 Report Share Posted December 25, 2012 As Portland Bill I believe said on sunday, SAF over reacted but nobody is talking about the fact they dropped 2 points and that he openly criticised Rooney in the press conference, eveybody is talking about this and that is managerial genius, only he Mourhinho have that brilliant ability, to take the focus away from a stuttering performance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barrs Court Red Posted December 25, 2012 Report Share Posted December 25, 2012 Years ago after Eubank did serious damage to Watson a doctor on BBC actually said footballers should wear head guards. True story! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRUEBRIT66 Posted December 25, 2012 Report Share Posted December 25, 2012 Years ago after Eubank did serious damage to Watson a doctor on BBC actually said footballers should wear head guards. True story! Months ago they banned kids from playing conkers in case your conker exploded taking out an entire housing estate...............True Story! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian Butterfield Posted December 25, 2012 Report Share Posted December 25, 2012 I think he lives on small rodents and stuff as he is a nocturnal predator Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CiderHider Posted December 25, 2012 Report Share Posted December 25, 2012 Please tell me that this is a joke? There is a distinct lack of smiley to know for sure, but the incident is not funny in itself, if he didn't get up and had to goto hospital would it be funny then? People just have it in for Fergie and Manu, especially the media, saying 'oh its fergie, playing his mind games again' No, it was a serious assault and its a bit annoying everyone is joking about it, a ball can be a weapon in the right hands and Williams knew this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRUEBRIT66 Posted December 25, 2012 Report Share Posted December 25, 2012 There is a distinct lack of smiley to know for sure, but the incident is not funny in itself, if he didn't get up and had to goto hospital would it be funny then? People just have it in for Fergie and Manu, especially the media, saying 'oh its fergie, playing his mind games again' No, it was a serious assault and its a bit annoying everyone is joking about it, a ball can be a weapon in the right hands and Williams knew this. The comedy value of that is endless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SimplyRed Posted December 26, 2012 Report Share Posted December 26, 2012 My only comment is, a football could cause brain damage if not headed correctly (i.e. by bracing the neck muscles, thus anticipating the impact). Van Persie could not possibly have anticipated the impact of the ball to his head and therefore had not braced himself. Ergo, while death may be a slight exageration, there is a very real possibility of brain damage caused by severe concussion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pride of the west Posted December 26, 2012 Report Share Posted December 26, 2012 Years ago after Eubank did serious damage to Watson a doctor on BBC actually said footballers should wear head guards. True story! I remember this and there was talk for quite some time on Stoping headers in youth football Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craven arms Posted December 26, 2012 Report Share Posted December 26, 2012 My only comment is, a football could cause brain damage if not headed correctly (i.e. by bracing the neck muscles, thus anticipating the impact). Van Persie could not possibly have anticipated the impact of the ball to his head and therefore had not braced himself. Ergo, while death may be a slight exageration, there is a very real possibility of brain damage caused by severe concussion. +1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spike Posted December 26, 2012 Report Share Posted December 26, 2012 Death was a bit over the top until you consider that essentially the speed the ball did ravel could have caused his neck to whip, he could have been paralysed, left with brain damage or maybe had a small concussion. No matter the outcome or the fact that Williams never intended to actually strike the ball into Van Persie it was still extremely dangerous and could have done serious harm. Had Williams lost his temper/ became frustrated and lunged into a tackle with two feet he would have been sent off and yet that could have been less dangerous. People seem to miss the fact what he did was dangerous and could have done serious damage and all he got was a booking, had it been a two footed challenge or had he even just pushed a player over he may have been sent off, very bad consistency in the logic in my opinion, I think he should have been sent off and disciplined. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craven arms Posted December 26, 2012 Report Share Posted December 26, 2012 have you actually watched it? from 3 yards away a ball would not get to 90mph for a start. im not saying it wasn't dangerous but people are really exaggerating. I think you should re-address your facts,the fastest point of a object is just after its been struck,then losese momentum the further travels............if your confused try looking at Newtons three laws of motion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.